Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Contribution of Perceptions in Analysis of Walking Behavior

Abstract

Researchers have recently begun to include psychosocial factors such as mental maps, social supports, and perceptions in analyses of travel behavior. Indeed, these subjective factors are distinct from the environment as measured objectively and might provide more insight regarding travel decisions. This study investigates the relationships between residents’ perceptions of their neighborhood environment and corresponding objective measures of the same attributes and ultimately tests their influence on walking behavior. This cross-sectional, disaggregate research design incorporates three major categories of data: (a) objective measures of the environment, (b) residents’ perceptions and attitudes about the environment, and (c) walking behavior data. Six indices representing major features of the environment are constructed from both the objective and perceptual measures. The analysis, which consists of models of walking behavior, reveals that walking behavior is associated with the environment both when measured through perceptions and objectively but that different aspects of the environment are significant from either perspective. These findings point to the need for more research into the influence that psychosocial factors have on travel behavior.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Axhausen K. Social Networks, Mobility Biographies, and Travel: Survey Challenges. Environment and Planning, Vol. 35B, 2008, pp. 981–996.
2. Saelens B. E., Sallis J. F., Black J. B., and Chen D. Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation. Research and Practice, Vol. 93, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1552–1558.
3. Kitamura R., Mokhtarian P. L., and Laidet L. A Micro-Analysis of Land-Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 125–158.
4. Appleyard D. Livable Streets. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1981.
5. Kaplan S., and Kaplan R., eds. Humanscape: Environments for People. Duxbury Press, N. Scituate, Mass., 1978.
6. Lynch K. The Image of the City. Technology Press and Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
7. Appleyard D., Lynch K., and Myer J. The View from the Road. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
8. Crane R. On Form Versus Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, or Increase It? Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 15, 1996, pp. 117–126.
9. Boarnet M. G., and Sarmiento S. Can Land-Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link Between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1135–1169.
10. Vernez-Moudon A., and Lee C. Walking and Bicycling: An Evaluation of Environmental Audit Instruments. American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2003, pp. 21–37.
11. Cervero R., and Kockelman K. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity and Design. Transportation Research, Vol. 2D, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199–219.
12. Clifton K. J., Livi Smith A. D., and Rodriguez D. A. The Development and Testing of an Audit for the Pedestrian Environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 80, No. 1-2, 2007, pp. 95–110.
13. Handy S. L., Boarnet M. G., Ewing R., and Killingsworth R. E. How the Built Environment Affects Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 23 (2S), 2002, pp. 64–73.
14. Humpel N., Owen N., Iverson D., Leslie E., and Bauman A. Perceived Environment Attributes, Residential Location, and Walking for Particular Purposes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2004, pp. 119–125.
15. Wainer H. Estimating Coefficients in Linear Models: It Don't Make No Nevermind. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 83, 1976, pp. 213–217.
16. Livi Smith A. D., Burnier C. V., and Clifton K. J. Women's Walking Behavior and Health: Exploring the Links. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
17. Lee C., and Vernez Moudon A. Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 2006, pp. S77–S98.
18. Ewing R., Schmid T., Killingsworth R., Zlot A., and Raudenbush S. Relationship Between Urban Sprawl and Physical Activity, Obesity and Morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2003, pp. 47–57.
19. Hoehner C., Brennan Ramirez L., Elliott M., Handy S., and Brownson R. Perceived and Objective Environmental Measures and Physical Activity Among Urban Adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 2, Suppl. 2, 2005, pp. 105–116.
20. Giles-Corti B., and Donovan R. Socioeconomic Status Differences in Recreational Physical Activity Levels and Real and Perceived Access to a Supportive Physical Environment. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 35, 2002, pp. 601–611.
21. Vernez-Moudon A., Lee C., Cheadle A., Garvin C., Johnson D., Schmid T. L., Weathers R. D., and Lin L. Operational Definitions of Walk-able Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 3, No. S1, 2006, pp. S99–S117.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andréa Livi Smith
University of Mary Washington, 1301 College Avenue, Fredericksburg, VA 22401-5300.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 51

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 8

  1. Walkability Analysis of an Urban Area: Gender-Based and Combined Model...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Objective and Subjective Approaches Towards Analysis of Level of Servi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Statistical Analysis for Assessing the Built Environment Walkability o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Improving the Pedestrian’s Perceptions of Safety on Street Crossings. ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Aesthetics and thebuilt environment: no painting or musical piece can ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Influence of built environment on pedestrian's crossing decision
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Perception-Based Walkability Index to Test Impact of Microlevel Walkab...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A Role for GPS Data in Qualitative Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub