Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Pedestrian and Bicyclist Exposure to Risk: Methodology for Estimation in an Urban Environment

Abstract

There is currently no commonly accepted or adopted measure of pedestrian and bicycle exposure to risk. Consequently, a large portion of the field of pedestrian and bicycle safety is lacking an adequate means to evaluate the effectiveness of its efforts. The current study presents a proposed metric for measuring pedestrian and bicycle exposure to risk: hundred million pedestrian or bicycle miles of roadway (or other motor vehicle shared facility) traveled. A method for implementing the proposed exposure metric is described for eight shared-facility types characteristic of the urban environment of Washington, D.C. These facilities include three types of intersections, midblock road segments, driveways, alleys, parking lots, parking garages, school areas, and areas with playing, dashing, and working in the roadway. The methodology is then used to calculate the annual pedestrian and bicycle exposure for the city for the calendar year 2007. The results of these calculations revealed 0.82 hundred million miles for pedestrian exposure and 0.37 hundred million miles for bicyclist exposure. In this way both the feasibility and scalability of the proposed metric were successfully demonstrated for a relatively large urban environment. Thus the proposed metric has the potential to eliminate one of the major obstacles in the pedestrian and bicycle safety field, the lack of adequate exposure data. Although further refinement and validation are still needed, the proposed metric provides a possible initial foundation to develop a national unit of risk exposure for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Raford N., and Ragland D. Space Syntax: Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 66–74.
2. National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Traffic Safety Facts: Pedestrians. Publication DOT HS 810 810. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
3. Fatality Analysis Reporting System. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, undated. www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/fars.html.
4. General Estimates System. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, undated.
5. Highway Statistics. Publication FHWA-PL-08-018. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
6. Hedlund J. Pedestrian and Bicycle Strategic Planning Research Workshops: Draft Final Report. NHTSA–FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2000.
7. Chu X. The Fatality Risk of Walking in America: A Time-Based Comparative Approach. Presented at 4th International Conference on Walking in the 21st Century, Portland, Ore., 2003.
8. Keall M. D. Pedestrian Exposure to Risk of Road Accident in New Zealand. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 27, 1995, pp. 729–740.
9. Cameron M. A Method of Measuring Exposure to Pedestrian Accident Risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1982, pp. 397–405.
10. Qin X., and Ivan J. Estimating Pedestrian Exposure Prediction Model in Rural Areas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1773, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 89–96.
11. National Household Survey. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
12. Kaplan J. Characteristics of the Regular Adult Bicycle User. MS thesis. University of Maryland, 1975. www.bicyclinglife.com/Library. Accessed Nov. 6, 2008.
13. Hauer E. Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety. Pergamon, New York, 2002.
14. Washington, D.C.'s 2006 Visitor Statistics. Destination D.C. www.washington.org/images/marketing/2006_visitorstats.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2008.
15. DC Area: DDOT Traffic Camera Location Map. app.ddot.dc.gov/services_dsf/traffic_cameras/index.asp. Accessed July 15, 2008.
16. Zegeer C., Stewart R., Huang H., Lagerwey P., Feganes J., and Campbell B. Safety Effects of Marked versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-100. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
17. The Old Farmer's Almanac. www.almanac.com/astronomy. Accessed July 15, 20008.

Reference

18. Traffic Engineering Handbook, 6th ed. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., March 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John A. Molino
Science Applications International Corporation, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, F-215, McLean, VA 22101.
Jason F. Kennedy
Science Applications International Corporation, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, F-215, McLean, VA 22101.
Patches L. Johnson
Science Applications International Corporation, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, F-215, McLean, VA 22101.
Pascal A. Beuse
Science Applications International Corporation, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, F-215, McLean, VA 22101.
Amanda K. Emo
Federal Highway Administration, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, T-210, McLean, VA 22101.
Ann Do
Federal Highway Administration, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, T-210, McLean, VA 22101.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 119

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 11

  1. Leveraging the spatial-temporal resolution of crowdsourced cycling dat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Fatality risk and issues of inequity among vulnerable road users in So...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Vulnerable road users’ crash hotspot identification on multi-lane arte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. On cycling risk and discomfort: urban safety mapping and bike route re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Daily and Latent Lagged Effects of Rainfall on Pedestrian–Vehicle Coll...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Identifying High-Risk Intersections for Walking and Bicycling Using Mu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Adding temporal information to direct-demand models: Hourly estimation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Spatial models of active travel in small communities: Merging the goal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Evaluating Crash Risk in Urban Areas Based on Vehicle and Pedestrian M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Computer Vision Techniques for the Automated Collection of Cyclist Dat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub