Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

What Does it Take for Shuttles to Succeed?: Comparison of Stated Preferences and Reality of Shuttle Success in New Jersey

Abstract

In 1998, New Jersey Transit (NJ Transit) conducted an onboard survey of passengers on three of its commuter rail lines on their preferences for new shuttle services. During the first half of the 2000s, community-based shuttle service was introduced in several New Jersey communities—many under the federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. Some of these services continue today, but others were discontinued. This study uses data from the onboard survey to identify the rider characteristics and spatial characteristics of communities that influence stated preferences for shuttle service to rail stations. Correlation analysis, factor analysis, and logistic regression are used to identify these characteristics. With the use of results from the stated preference analysis, the communities where shuttle service has continued were compared with communities where service has been discontinued, to identify the factors that may influence the shuttle's success. The analysis of stated preferences and the comparison of communities suggest that concentration of immigrant populations, non-English speakers, and persons with moderate income may be important for the success of shuttles in the study area. Sporadic evidence was found that parking costs and availability of parking at stations may influence people's decision to use shuttles. Similar evidence is found indicating that people with high incomes, people who live close to stations, and people who already use rail transit regularly may be indifferent to new shuttle service.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program. Washington, D.C. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/cmaqpgs/. Accessed July 28, 2009.
2. Urbitran Associates, Inc., Multisystems, Inc., SG Associates, Inc., and R. Cervero. TCRP Report 55: Guidelines for Enhancing Suburban Mobility Using Public Transportation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
3. Shannon E., and Brower K. You've Got Connections! Increasing Shuttle Bus Services to the MTA Railroads. Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA, Metropolitan Transit Authority, New York, 2002.
4. Anspacher D., Khattak A. J., and Yim Y. Demand-Responsive Transit Shuttles: Who Will Use Them? UCB-ITS-PWP-2004-5. California Path Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2004.
5. Pucher J., and Renne J. Socioeconomics of Urban Travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2003, pp. 49–77.
6. Polzin S. E., and Chu X. Public Transit in America: Results from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2005.
7. Deka D. Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation. In Geography of Urban Transportation (Hanson S., and Giuliano G., eds.), Guildford Press, New York, 2004, pp. 332–355.
8. Liu R., and Schachter H. L. Emergency Response Plans and Needs of Communities with Limited English Proficiency. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2013, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1–7.
9. Blumenberg E. Immigrants and Transport Barriers to Employment: The Case of Southeast Asian Welfare Recipients in California. Transport Policy, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp. 33–42.
10. Cervero R. Profiling Profitable Bus Routes. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 44, 1990, pp. 183–201.
11. Pushkarev B. S., and Zupan J. M. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind., 1977.
12. Cervero R. America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use–Transportation Link. Unwin Hyman, Boston, Mass., 1989.
13. Cervero R., and Gorham R. Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 61, No. 2, 1995, pp. 210–225.
14. Cervero R. Built Environments and Mode Choice: Toward a Normative Framework. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2002, pp. 265–284.
15. Lutin J. M., Krykewycz G. R., Hacker J. F., and Marchwinski T. W. Transit Score: Screening Model for Evaluating Community Suitability for Transit Investments. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 115–124.
16. Urbitran Associates, Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Kittelson & Associates, Pitman & Associates, and Center for Urban Transportation Research. TCRP Report 116: Guidebook for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Devajyoti Deka
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.
Jon Carnegie
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.
Peter Bilton
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 21

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Estimating Demand for a New Travel Mode in Boise, Idaho
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Designing Shuttle Connections to Commuter Rail with Census Origin and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Panel Data Analysis to Identify Covariates of Longevity and Patronage ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub