Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Bicycling and Transit: A Marriage Unrealized

Abstract

When effectively integrated with transit services, bicycling may achieve various environmental, health, and congestion-mitigation benefits for communities. A successful marriage between the two will most likely result in increasing (a) the catchment area and subsequent patronage of transit, (b) the efficiency of transit, and (c) the overall demand for cycling. A core problem, however, exists in that the predominant approach for integrating bicycling and transit vehicles frequently runs against capacity restraints. Effectively integrating bicycling and transit requires analysis of a broad range of alternatives that consider the travel patterns and needs of individuals and accompanying urban form characteristics. To fill a void in the literature concerning integrating bicycling and transit, this paper surveys existing knowledge about the two modes, describes three innovative initiatives that show promise in addressing capacity limitations, and sketches an analysis framework for communities and transit agencies to maximize the integration of bicycling and transit. A preliminary index is developed to predict cycling transit user (CTU) generation at transit stops. Factors identified in the literature as important in determining the share of CTUs (i.e., transit mode, location in the urban fabric, access and egress distance, and trip purpose) are nonuniform among communities, indicating that solutions must be tailored to fit local circumstances. Although the literature has traditionally focused on bicycles aboard transit, real gains will most likely be realized through initiatives such as bicycle stations and bicycles at egress locations for use with egress trips. Analysis relying on robust cost-effectiveness could help transit agencies with increased integration of bicycling and transit.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Transport Statistics Bulletin—Road Statistics 2008: Traffic, Speeds and Congestion. United Kingdom Department for Transport, London, June 2009.
2. 2008 Participation—Ranked by Percent Change. National Sporting Goods Association. http://www.nsga.org/files/public/20082008RankedbyPercentChange22_4Web_080423.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2009.
3. 10.7 Billion Trips Taken on U.S. Public Transportation in 2008—Highest Level in 52 Years; Ridership Increased as Gas Prices Decline and Jobs Were Lost. American Public Transportation Agency. http://www.apta.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2009/Pages/090309_ridership.aspx. Accessed March 15, 2010.
4. Pucher J., and Buehler R. Integrating Bicycles and Public Transport in North America. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 12, 2009.
5. TCRP Synthesis 62: Integration of Bicycles and Transit. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
6. Bicycles and Transit: A Partnership That Works. FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1998.
7. Schneider R. TCRP Synthesis 62: Integration of Bicycles and Transit. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
8. Martens K. The Bicycle as a Feedering Mode: Experiences from Three European Countries. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2004, pp. 281–294.
9. Martens K. Promoting Bicycle-and-Ride: The Dutch Experience. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2007, pp. 326–338.
10. Taylor D., and Mahmassani H. Analysis of Stated Preferences for Intermodal Bicycle–Transit Interfaces. In Transportation Research Record 1556, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 86–95.
11. Rietveld P., Bruinsma F. R., and Van Vuuren D. J. Coping with Unreliability in Public Transport Chains: A Case Study for the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2001, pp. 539–559.
12. Hagelin C. A Return on Investment Analysis of Bicycles-on-Bus Programs. NCTR 576-05. FDOT BD549-04. National Center for Transit Research, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2005.
13. Keijer M., and Rietveld P. How Do People Get to the Railway Station? The Dutch Experience. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 23, 2000, pp. 215–235.
14. Brojns M., Givoni M., and Rietveld P. Access to Railway Stations and Its Potential in Increasing Rail Use. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2009, pp. 136–149.
15. Rietveld P. The Accessibility of Railway Stations: The Role of the Bicycle in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2000, pp. 71–75.
16. Van Goeverden C. D., and Egeter B. Gecombineerd Gebruik van Fiets en Openbaar Vervoer: Verwachte Effecten op de Vervoerwijzekeuze van Optimale Fietsbeschikbaarheid in Voor-en Natransport. TU Delft, Faculteit der Civiele Techniek, Delft, Netherlands, 1993.
17. Givoni M., and Rietveld P. The Access Journey to the Railway Station and Its Role in Passengers’ Satisfaction with Rail Travel. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 357–365.
18. Brunsing J. Public Transport and Cycling: Experience of Modal Integration in Germany. In The Greening of Urban Transport: Planning for Walking and Cycling in Western Cities (Tolley R., ed.), Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1998.
19. Caltrain Bicycle Access and Parking Plan. Prepared by Eisen Letunic in association with Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants. Oct. 2, 2008. http://www.caltrain.com/pdf/Caltrain_bike_plan_DRAFT_09-29-08_BODY.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2010.
20. http://twitter.com/bikecar. Accessed March 15, 2010.
21. Puget Sound Regional Council. Central Puget Sound Regional Bike-stations Project. Seattle, Wash. http://www.psrc.org/assets/1977/_02–30_bikestation.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin J. Krizek
College of Architecture and Planning, University of Colorado, Denver, Campus Box 126 POB. 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364.
Eric W. Stonebraker
College of Architecture and Planning, University of Colorado, Denver, Campus Box 126 POB. 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 380

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 54

  1. Associations between Light Rail Transit and physical activity: a syste...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Integrated Bicycle and Public Transit Routing for InnaMoRuhr
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Investigation of modal integration of bike-sharing and public transit ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Rower w pojeździe publicznego transportu zbiorowego – studium zasad pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The effects of bike-share users’ socio-demographics and trip features ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The Public Bicycle as a Feeder Mode for Metro Commuters in the Megacit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A Data-Driven Optimization Computational Tool Design for Bike-Sharing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Metropolitan bicycle-sharing system in the Polish context of various n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Insights into factors affecting the combined bicycle-transit mode
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Train-feeder modes in Italy. Is there a role for active mobility?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The bicycle-train travellers in the Netherlands: personal profiles and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Bike-Sharing System: Uncovering the “Success Factors”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Predicting Bicycle-on-Board Transit Choice in a University Environment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of k...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Traffic Safety Perception, Attitude, and Feeder Mode Choice of Metro C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Factors underlying the connections between active transportation and p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. The sociotechnical roots of smart mobility: Bike sharing since 1965
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Commuting patterns and bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS): Insights...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Built environment effects on the integration of dockless bike-sharing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Implementing TOD around suburban and rural stations: an exploration of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Bicycle train intermodality: Effects of demography, station characteri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Park ‘n’ Roll: Identifying and Prioritizing Locations for New Bicycle ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Biking to Ride: Investigating the Challenges and Barriers of Integrati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Designing a Transit-Feeder System using Multiple Sustainable Modes: Pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Bikeshare Pool Sizing for Bike-and-Ride Multimodal Transit
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Expanding the effect of metro station service coverage by incorporatin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Effects of perception on public bike-and-ride: A survey under complex,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. If We Build It, Will They Come? Environmental Approaches to Bicycle Pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. The design of a composite folding bike to improve the user experience ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Exploring the synergistic economic benefit of enhancing neighbourhood ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Public bicycle as a feeder mode to rail transit in China: The role of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. A user-centred assessment of a new bicycle sharing system in Medellin
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Long-term impact of network access to bike facilities and public trans...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Bicycling to Rail Stations in New Jersey
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Commuter cycling policy in Singapore: a farecard data analytics based ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. A Multi-modal Transportation Score to Evaluate Infrastructure Supply-d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Bicycle parking demand at railway stations: Capturing price-walking tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Shifts between Automobile, Bus, and Bicycle Commuting in an Urban Sett...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Simultaneous optimization of transit network and public bicycle statio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Assessment of Bicycle Service Areas around Transit Stations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Case Study of Transit–Bicycle Integration...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Changes in access to public transportation for cycle–transit users in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Bicycle Sharing Systems Demand
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Exploring Synergy in Bicycle and Transit Use...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Public Transit Catchment Areas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Multimodal Commuting to Work by Public Transport and Bicycle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Non-motorized Travel as a Sustainable Travel Option
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. 8.4.1 A Systems Perspective to Commuter Cycling in Urban Mobility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Evaluating bicycle-transit users’ perceptions of intermodal inconvenie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Chapter 5 Cycling, Urban Form and Cities: What do We Know and How shou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Causal Exploration of Bike Accidents in the Bay Area
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Assessing Options to Enhance Bicycle and Transit Integration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Much-Anticipated Marriage of Cycling and Transit: How Will It Work?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub