Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Exploratory Study of Mechanisms by Which Exposure Influences Accident Occurrence

Abstract

A study explores mechanisms by which exposure influences accident occurrence. The study is based on a previous one in which exposure was defined as the occurrence of specific events that represent an opportunity for an accident to happen. Four such events were considered: encounters, simultaneous arrivals in intersections or at pedestrian crossing facilities, lane changes, and braking. A review is done of some studies that permit the shape of the relationship between the number of events and the probability of accident occurrence to be determined. It is found that, in general, the rate of accidents per event falls sharply as the number of events increases. This finding can be interpreted as a learning curve: the more often road users encounter a specific event, the more skillful they become in recognizing and controlling the risks involved in that event. A measure of learning efficiency is proposed, and it is shown that learning efficiency varies between different types of events. It is suggested that the complexity, controllability, and predictability of an event influence learning efficiency. More complex, less controllable, and less predictable events reduce learning efficiency because these events are associated with cognitive overload and violation of road user expectations. Examples are given of events of varying degrees of complexity, controllability, and predictability. Another mechanism by which events involving conflict or physical contact between road users become recorded as accidents is incompatibility, which refers to differences in the kinetic energy produced by different types of vehicles and the degree to which they protect road users from impact.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chapman R. The Concept of Exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1973, pp. 95–110.
2. Elvik R., Erke A., and Christensen P. Elementary Units of Exposure. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2103, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 25–31.
3. Sakshaug K., and Johannessen S. Revisjon av håndbok 115 Analyse av ulykkessteder. Verdier for normal ulykkesfrekvens og skadekostnad ved normal og god standard. Notat 2005-05-03. SINTEF Teknologi og samfunn, Transportsikkerhet og–informatikk, Trondheim, Norway, 2005.
4. Elvik R. Laws of Accident Causation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 742–747.
5. Elvik R. The Non-Linearity of Risk and the Promotion of Environmentally Sustainable Transport. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 849–855.
6. Johannessen S., and Heir J. Trafikksikkerhet i vegkryss: En analyse av ulykkesforholdene i 187 vegkryss i perioden 1968–72. Oppdragsrapport nr 4. Forskningsgruppen, Institutt for samferdselsteknikk, Norges Tekniske Høgskole, Trondheim, 1974.
7. Elvik R., and Mysen A. B. Incomplete Accident Reporting: Meta-Analysis of Studies Made in 13 Countries. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 133–140.
8. Hauer E. The Frequency–Severity Indeterminacy. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2006, pp. 78–83.
9. Hagen K-E. Samfunnsøkonomisk regnskapssystem for trafikkulykker og trafikksikkerhetstiltak. Rapport 182. Transportøkonomisk institutt, Oslo, Norway, 1993.
10. Hagen K-E. Rullering av samfunnsøkonomisk regnskapssystem for trafikkulykker og trafikksikkerhetstiltak for 1992. Arbeidsdokument TST/0570/1994. Transportøkonomisk institutt, Oslo, Norway, 1994.
11. Elvik R. Criteria for Causal Inference: Lessons from Epidemiology Applied to Safety Evaluation. Presented at Workshop on Future Directions in Highway Crash Data Modeling, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Nov. 21–22, 2008.
12. Fuller R. Towards a General Theory of Driving Behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2005, pp. 461–472.
13. Wilde G. J. S. The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health. Risk Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1982, pp. 209–225.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rune Elvik
Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Using HLM to investigate the relationship between traffic accident ris...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Comparison Between Young Male Drivers’ Self-assessed and Objectively M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Accuracy of young male drivers’ self-assessments of driving skill
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How indicative is a self-reported driving behaviour profile of police ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Some implications of an event-based definition of exposure to the risk...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The Relative Odds of Involvement in Seven Crash Configurations by Driv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub