Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Air Pollution Impacts of Shifting Freight from Truck to Rail at California's San Pedro Bay Ports

Abstract

Escalating concerns about air quality in southern California have led authorities at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, also known as the San Pedro Bay Ports (SPBP), to adopt a number of measures designed to mitigate emissions. One way to do this is to shift some of the containers currently transported by drayage trucks to trains. This alternative is attractive because it would decrease congestion and air pollution on the area's main freeways (I-710 and I-110) and the arterials that serve the SPBP. In addition, it would increase road safety along the busy Alameda freight corridor between the SPBP and downtown Los Angeles. One drawback would be an increase in pollutant emissions from train operations in the Alameda corridor; however, trains tend to pollute less than trucks per ton-mile, and new federal regulations are tightening the emissions standards for diesel locomotives. The goal of this paper is to quantify the net impact of such a modal shift on the emission of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), the two air pollutants of most concern in the SPBP area. This analysis relies on microscopic simulation to capture emissions resulting from stop-and-go traffic on the freeways serving the SPBP. It was found that emissions of both NOx and particles less than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) can be significantly reduced by switching from drayage trucks to trains. This finding suggests that a modal shift should be encouraged, especially if there is unused train capacity and if the shift does not conflict with the shippers' interests.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Evaluation of Port Trucks and Possible Mitigation Strategies. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento, 2006.
2. Analysis of Goods Movement Emission Reduction Strategies. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, 2008.
3. Regional Transportation Improvement Program. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, 2008.
4. Port of Long Beach Air Emissions Inventory 2005. Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, Calif., 2007.
5. Emission Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement in California. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento, 2006.
6. San Pedro Bay Ports Rail Study Update. Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Calif., 2006.
7. San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action Plan. Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, Calif., 2006.
8. Port of Long Beach Air Emissions Inventory 2007. Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, Calif., 2009.
9. Port of Long Beach Air Emissions Inventory 2007. Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, Calif. http://www.polb.com/news/displaynews.asp?NewsID=497. Accessed July 6, 2009.
10. Fischer M. J., Hicks G., and Cartwright K. Performance Measure Evaluation of Port Truck Trip Reduction Strategies. Presented at National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, Calif., 2006.
11. Park M., Regan A., and Yang C. H. Emissions Impacts of a Modal Shift: A Case Study of the Southern California Ports Region. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2007, pp. 67–81.
12. Nesamani K. S., Chu L., McNally M. G., and Jayakrishnan R. Estimation of Vehicular Emissions by Capturing Traffic Variations. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 41, No. 13, 2007, pp. 2296–3008.
13. TransModeler User's Guide: Traffic Simulation Software. Caliper, Newton, Mass., 2008.
14. Lee G., You S., Ritchie S. G., Saphores J.-D. M., Sangkapichai M., and Jayakrishnan R. Environmental Impacts of a Major Freight Corridor: A Study of the I-710 in California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2123, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 119–128.
15. Sangkapichai M., Saphores J.-D. M., Ritchie S., You S., and Lee G. Analysis of PM and NOx Train Emissions in the Alameda Corridor, Calif. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
16. Lee G., Sangkapichai M., Ritchie S. G., Saphores J.-D. M., Ogunseitan O., Ayala R., Jayakrishnan R., and Torres R. Assessing the Environmental and Health Impacts of Port-Related Freight Movement in a Major Urban Transportation Corridor. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
17. EMFAC 2007 User's Guide. California Air Resource Board, Sacramento, 2008.
18. Boriboonsomsin K., and Barth M. Impacts of Freeway High-Occupancy Vehicle Lane Configuration on Vehicle Emissions. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 13, 2008, pp. 112–125.
19. Passenger Car Equivalents for Heavy Vehicles at Freeways and Multilane Highways: Some Critical Issues. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3734/is_200603/ai_n17184129/?tag=content;col1. Accessed July 20, 2009.
20. CARB's Size Fraction Data. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento. http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/speciate/speciate.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009.
21. Wu J., Houston D., Lurmann F., Ong P., and Winer A. Exposure of PM2.5 and EC from Diesel and Gasoline Vehicles in Communities near the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 12, 2009, pp. 1962–1971.
22. Sangkapichai M., Saphores J. D., Ogunseitan O., and Ritchie S. An Analysis of the Health Impacts from PM and NOx Emissions Resulting from Train Operations in the Alameda Corridor, CA. Presented at 3rd National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, Calif., October 21-23, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Soyoung (Iris) You
Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3600.
Gunwoo Lee
Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3600.
Stephen G. Ritchie
Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3600.
Jean-Daniel Saphores
Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3600.
Mana Sangkapichai
Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3600.
Roberto Ayala
Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3600.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 93

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 16

  1. Modal shift ambitions of large North European ports: A contract-theory...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Air quality improvement via modal shift: Assessment of rail-water-port...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Environmental benefit analysis of “road-to-rail” policy in China based...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A two-stage residential location and transport mode choice model with ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Ports' technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas emi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Air Quality and Health Impacts of Freight Modal Shifts: Review and Ass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Health and climate impacts of future United States land freight modell...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Urban Growth, Transport Planning, Air Quality and Health: A Multi-Obje...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Supporting healthy route choice for commuter cyclists: The trade-off b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Highway Vehicle Emissions Avoided by Diesel Passenger Rail Service Bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Use of Empty Containers to Move Regional Cargo in Port Hinterland...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Developing a Microscopic Transportation Emissions Model to Estimate Ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Assessment of Particulate Matter Levels in Vulnerable Communities in N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  14. Analysis of Cost-Benefit Ratio for Dual-Load Transportation Using Empt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Using a traffic simulation model (VISSIM) with an emissions model (MOV...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Traffic exposure near the Los Angeles–Long Beach port complex: using G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub