Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Transportation Policy, Poverty, and Sustainability: History and Future

Abstract

Mobility and increased access to transportation are two of the most important global forces for the alleviation of poverty. This is especially true in rapidly developing areas of the world, exemplified by China and India. It is also true in the United States, where huge gaps in mobility between rich and poor remain. Growing concern over the need to address global sustainability focuses attention on the rise in greenhouse gas levels, which is increasingly associated with increases in mobility. It is often suggested that improved mobility must be sacrificed to achieve sustainability. This paper examines the trade-offs between the need for mobility to foster economic development and the need to reduce the production of greenhouse gases to achieve global sustainability. The attainment of sustainable mobility requires increased global access to goods, services, education, and economic opportunity, alongside reductions in the production of greenhouse gases. The attainment of one cannot be an excuse for forgoing the other. Transportation technology and policy must address the twin goals of improving mobility while decreasing the levels of production of greenhouse gases.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. United Nations Children's Fund. State of the World's Children, 2009. http://www.unicef.org/search/search.php?q=State+of+the+World%27s+Children&Go.x=338&Go.y=9.
2. World Bank Key Development Data and Statistics. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2010. http://data.worldbank.org/.
3. Chen S., and Ravallion M. The Developing World Is Poorer Than We Thought, but No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty. World Bank, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2008.
4. National Poverty Center, University of Michigan. Poverty in the United States: Frequently Asked Questions, 2009. http://www.npc.umich.edu/poverty/.
5. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1968.
6. A Report to the Delegates from the Conference Sections and Special Concerns Sessions. 1971 White House Conference on Aging. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom?portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&EricExtSearchValue_0=ED058541&ERICExtSearch_SearchType)=no&accno;=ED58541.
7. Garcia R., and Rubin T. A. Crossroads Blues: The MTA Consent Decree and Just Transportation. In Running on Empty: Transport, Social Exclusion and Environmental Justice (Lucas K., ed.), Policy Press, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2004, p. 222.
8. Blumenberg E., and Ong P. Can Welfare Recipients Afford to Work Far from Home? Access, No. 10, 1997, pp. 10–15.
9. Blumenberg E., and Ong P. Cars, Buses, and Jobs: Welfare Participants and Employment Access in Los Angeles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1756, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 22–31.
10. Hanson S. Gender and Mobility: New Approaches for Informing Sustainability. Gender, Place, and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 1 (Feb.), 2010, pp. 5–23.
11. Pisarski A. E. NCHRP Report 550 and TCRP Report 110: Commuting in America, III: The Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, p. 17.
12. A Heavy Load: The Combined Housing and Transportation Burdens of Working Families. Center for Housing Policy, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2006.
13. Wachs M., and Taylor B. Can Transportation Strategies Help Meet the Welfare Challenge? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 64, No. 1 (March) 1998, pp. 15–19.
14. CNN Heroes: Woman Gives Low-Income Workers “Wheels of Success.” http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/09/17/cnnheroes.susan.jacobs/index.html.
15. Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change, 2007: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Valencia, Spain, 2007.
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010 U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2008. Report 430-R-10-006, Apr. 2010. http://epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html.
17. Special Report 290: Potential Impacts of Climate Change on U.S. Transportation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.
18. EPA Sends the White House an Endangerment Finding. AASHTO Journal: Weekly Transportation Report, Nov. 13, 2009. http://www.aashtojournal.org/Pages1113epa.aspx.
19. U.S. Conference of Mayors. U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, 2008. http://www.usmayors.org/climateprotection/agreement.html.
20. Holden E. Achieving Sustainable Mobility: Everyday and Leisure-Time Travel in the EU. Ashgate, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 2007.
21. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., July 2009.
22. Orski C. K. A Tendentious Report Has the Transportation Community up in Arms. Innovation Briefs, Vol. 20, No. 15, Aug. 18, 2009. www.innobriefs.com.
23. Cox W. Taking the Fun out of Global Warming, Aug. 26, 2009. http://www.newgeography.com/content/00984.
24. Special Report 298: Driving and the Built Environment: The Effects of Compact Development on Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and CO2 Emissions. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Martin Wachs
RAND Corporation, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 641

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 19

  1. Exploring Neighborhood Differences in Bicycling Accessibility to Physi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The entrepreneurial mindset and poverty
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A review on the socio-economic impacts of informal transportation and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Advancing energy and well-being research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. How neighborhood conditions and policy incentives affect relocation ou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Our Work Is Never Done: Examining Equity Impacts in Public Transportat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The Liability of Poorness: Why the Playing Field is Not Level for Pove...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Analysis of Spatial Mismatch and Equity using Commuting and Labor Shed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Transportation sustainability in the urban context: a comprehensive re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Sustainability evaluation of rapid routes for buses with a network DEA...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Bus Stops as Interactive Touchpoints
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Inside the sustainable consumption theoretical toolbox: Critical conce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The relationship between public transport and the progressive developm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. The Peñalosa Principle of Transportation Democracy: Lessons from Bogot...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. A Different Trolley Problem: The Limits of Environmental Justice and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Getting Around When You’re Just Getting By: Transportation Survival St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Modeling Transportation Affordability with Cumulative Density Function...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. LandSys: an agent-based Cellular Automata model of land use change dev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub