Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Transfer of Innovative Policies between Cities to Promote Sustainability: Case Study Evidence

Abstract

This paper describes how cities approach the challenging task of identifying, considering, and adopting innovative transport policies. Drawing on political science literature, the paper begins by establishing a framework for analyzing the process of policy transfer and policy learning. Cities were selected on the basis of their reputation for having adopted innovative policies. Data were collected from project reports and in-depth interviews with 40 professionals comprising planners, consultants, and operators in 11 cities across North America and northern Europe. This paper presents the findings from three key innovations: congestion charging, compact growth and transport planning, and carsharing. Each of these innovations was implemented at several sites, and there was evidence of learning across the sites studied. The case studies present a discussion of each policy alongside indications of its positive and negative impacts and then examine how the different cities approached the task of learning about how to introduce it and the issues that they faced. The paper identifies conditions that appear to support effective learning: reliance on strong networks of personal and professional contacts, drawing lessons from multiple sites, and financial and institutional support to facilitate the uptake of risky or technologically immature innovations.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Levi-Faur D., and Vigoda-Gadot E. New Public Policy, New Policy Transfers: Some Characteristics of a New Order in the Making. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 247–262.
2. Berry F. S. Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review, Vol. 54, 1997, p. 322.
3. Kern K., Koll C., and Schophaus M. The Diffusion of Local Agenda 21 in Germany: Comparing the German Federal States. Environmental Politics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007, pp. 604–624.
4. Heichel S., Pape J., and Sommerer T. Is There Convergence in Convergence Research? An Overview of Empirical Studies on Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2005, pp. 817–840.
5. Marsden G., Frick K. T., May A. D., and Deakin E. Good Practice in the Exploitation of Innovative Strategies in Sustainable Urban Transport: City Interview Synthesis. University of Leeds/Volvo Research and Educational Foundation, 2009. www.its.leeds.ac.uk.
6. Marsden G. Good Practice in the Exploitation of Innovative Strategies in Sustainable Urban Transport: A Review of Evidence. University of Leeds/Volvo Research and Educational Foundation, 2008. www.its.leeds.ac.uk.
7. Vickrey W. Pricing in Urban and Suburban Transport. American Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1963, pp. 452–465.
8. May A. D., and Milne D. S. The Impact on Network Performance of Drivers' Response to Alternative Road Pricing Schemes. In Road Pricing: Theory. Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 61–85.
9. Central London Congestion Charging: Impacts Monitoring—6th Annual Report. Transport for London, 2008.
10. Eliasson J., Hultkrantz A., Nerhagen L., and Rosqvist L. S. The Stockholm Congestion-Charging Trial 2006: Overview of Effects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2009, pp. 240–250.
11. Gaunt M., Rye T., and Ison S. Gaining Public Support for Congestion Charging: Lessons from Referendum in Edinburgh, Scotland. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1960, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 87–93.
12. C-Charge: A Resounding NO. Manchester Evening News, Dec. 12, 2008. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1085031_ccharge_a_resounding_no. Accessed July 10, 2009.
13. Sylvan H. Green Urban Mobility: Transport Plans for the Copenhagen Capital Region. City of Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.
14. Cervero R., Murphy S., Ferrell C., Goguts N., Tsai Y.-H., Arrington G. B., Boroski J., Smith-Heimer J., Golem R., Peninger P., Nakajima E., Chui E., Dunphy R., Myers M., and McKay S. TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
15. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. HUD, DOT, and EPA Partnership: Sustainable Communities, June 16, 2009. http://www.hud.gov/content/releases/pr2009-06-16factsheet.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2009.
16. Wolman H., and Page E. Policy Transfer Among Local Governments: An Information-Theory Approach. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2002, pp. 477–501.
17. MacDonald E. Street Facing Dwelling Units and Livability: The Impacts of Emerging Building Types in Vancouver's New High-Density Residential Neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 10, No. 1, Feb. 2005, pp. 13–38.
18. Transportation Plan Update: A Decade of Progress. City of Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Oct. 24, 2007.
19. Bridging the Gap: Annual Report 2008. Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle, Wash.
20. Shaheen S. A., Cohen A. P., and Roberts J. D. Car Sharing in North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, and Future Potential. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
21. Shaheen S. A., and Cohen A. P. Growth in Worldwide Car-Sharing: An International Comparison. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 81–89.
22. Myers D., and Cairns S. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2008-09. TRL Published Project Report 399. U.K. Transport Research Laboratory, 2009. http://www.carplus.org.uk/.
23. Millard-Ball A., Murray G., Ter Schure J., Fox C., and Burkhardt J. TCRP Report 108: Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
24. Albury D. Fostering Innovation in Public Services. Public Money and Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 51–56.
25. Hartley J. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money and Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 27–34.
26. Engeström Y. Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001, pp. 133–156.
27. Sauquet A. Learning in Organisations: Schools of Thought and Current Challenges. In Dynamics of Organizational Change and Learning (Boonstra J. J., ed.), John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom, 2004, pp. 371–388.
28. Salskov-Iverson D. Learning Across Borders: The Case of Danish Local Government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19, No. 7, 2006, pp. 673–686.
29. Rose R. Learning from Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide. Routledge, Oxon, United Kingdom, 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Greg Marsden
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Karen Trapenberg Frick
University of California Transportation Center, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, 2614 Dwight Way, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Anthony D. May
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth Deakin
City and Regional Planning Department, University of California, Berkeley, 228 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 109

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. The policy effects of innovative city pilot on the dual efficiency of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Detecting contagious spreading of urban innovations on the global city...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Joint road toll pricing and capacity development in discrete transport...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Not invented here: Transferability of congestion charges effects
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The importance of feedback: Policy transfer, translation and the role ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Governance and policy challenges of implementing urban low-carbon tran...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Intervention Policies for Private Car Ownership in Megacities of Devel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub