Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Examination of Methods to Estimate Crash Counts by Collision Type

Abstract

Multinomial logit (MNL) models have been applied extensively in transportation engineering, marketing, and recreational demand modeling. Thus far, this type of model has not been used to estimate the proportion of crashes by collision type. This study investigated the applicability of MNL models to predict the proportion of crashes by collision type and to estimate crash counts by collision type. MNL models were compared with two other methods described in recent publications to estimate crash counts by collision type: (a) fixed proportions of crash counts for all collision types and (b) collision type models. This study employed data collected between 2002 and 2006 on crashes that occurred on rural, two-lane, undivided highway segments in Minnesota. The study results showed that the MNL model could be used to predict the proportion of crashes by collision type, at least for the data set used. Furthermore, the method based on the MNL model was found useful to estimate crash counts by collision type, and it performed better than the method based on the use of fixed proportions. The use of collision type models, however, was still found to be the best way to estimate crash counts by specific collision type. In cases where collision type models are affected by the small sample size and a low sample-mean problem, the method based on the MNL model is recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lord D., Geedipally S. R., Persaud B. N., Washington S. P., van Schalkwyk I., Ivan J. N., Lyon C., and Jonsson T. NCHRP Web-Only Document 126: Methodology to Predict the Safety Performance of Rural Multilane Highways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.
2. Ivan J. N., Wang C., and Bernardo N. R. Explaining Two-Lane Highway Crash Rates Using Land Use and Hourly Exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000, pp. 787–795.
3. Lyon C., Oh J., Persaud B., Washington S., and Bared J. Empirical Investigation of Interactive Highway Safety Design Model Accident Prediction Algorithm: Rural Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 78–86.
4. Tarko A. P., Inerowicz M., Ramos J., and Li W. Tool with Road-Level Crash Prediction for Transportation Safety Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 16–25.
5. Hauer E., Ng J. C. N., and Lovell J. Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48–61.
6. Shankar V., Mannering F., and Barfield W. Effect of Roadway Geometric and Environmental Factors on Rural Freeway Accident Frequencies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1995, pp. 371–389.
7. Geedipally S. R., and Lord D. Investigating the Effect of Modeling Single-Vehicle and Multi-Vehicle Crashes Separately on Confidence Intervals of Poisson-Gamma Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 42, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1273–1282.
8. Abdel-Aty M., Keller J., and Brady P. A. Analysis of Types of Crashes at Signalized Intersections by Using Complete Crash Data and Tree-Based Regression. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 37–45.
9. Jonsson T., Lyon C., Ivan J. N., Washington S. P., van Schalkwyk I., and Lord D. Differences in the Performance of Safety Performance Functions Estimated for Total Crash Count and for Crash Count by Crash Type. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2102, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 115–123.
10. Kim D., Oh J., and Washington S. Modeling Crash Outcomes: New Insights into the Effects of Covariates on Crashes at Rural Intersections. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 4, 2006, pp. 282–292.
11. Lord D. Modeling Motor Vehicle Crashes Using Poisson-Gamma Models: Examining the Effects of Low Sample Mean Values and Small Sample Size on the Estimation of the Fixed Dispersion Parameter. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 751–766.
12. Lord D., and Mannering F. The Statistical Analysis of Crash-Frequency Data: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44. No. 5, pp. 291–305.
13. Lord D., Washington S. P., and Ivan J. N. Poisson, Poisson-Gamma and Zero Inflated Regression Models of Motor Vehicle Crashes: Balancing Statistical Fit and Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35–46.
14. Shankar V., and Mannering F. An Exploratory Multinomial Logit Analysis of Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Accident Severity. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1996, pp. 183–194.
15. Carson J., and Mannering F. The Effect of Ice Warning Signs on Accident Frequencies and Severities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2001, pp. 99–109.
16. Abdel-Aty M. Analysis of Driver Injury Severity Levels at Multiple Locations Using Ordered Probit Models. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2003, pp. 597–603.
17. Kockelman K., and Kweon Y. J. Driver Injury Severity: An Application of Ordered Probit Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2002, pp. 313–321.
18. Qin X., Ivan J. N., and Ravishanker N. Selecting Exposure Measures in Crash Rate Prediction for Two-Lane Highway Segments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2004, pp. 183–191.
19. Lord D., Guikema S. D., and Geedipally S. Application of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson Generalized Linear Model for Analyzing Motor Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1123–1134.
20. Jonsson T., Ivan J. N., and Zhang C. Crash Prediction Models for Intersections on Rural Multilane Highways: Differences by Collision Type. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 91–98.
21. McFadden D. Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice. In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (Manski, and McFadden D., eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.
22. Koppelman F. S., and Bhat C. R. A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models. Prepared for the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006, pp. 79–80.
23. Oh J., Lyon C., Washington S., Persaud B., and Bared J. Validation of FHWA Crash Models for Rural Intersections: Lessons Learned. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 41–49.
24. Greene W. H. LIMDEP, Version 9.0: User's Manual. Econometric Software, Plainview, N.Y., 2007.
25. SAS Institute Inc. Administrator Guide for the SAS System Version 9 for 64-bit Microsoft Windows. Cary, N.C., 2002.
26. Highway Safety Information System. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.hsisinfo.org/.
27. Train K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Srinivas Reddy Geedipally
Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843-3136.
Sunil Patil
Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136.
Dominique Lord
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, College Station, TX 77843-3136.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 91

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 32

  1. Predicting Road Traffic Accidents—Artificial Neural Network Approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Crash classification based on manner of collision: a comparative analy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Injury severity analysis of time-of-day fluctuations and temporal vola...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Factors That Influence the Type of Road Traffic Accidents: A Case Stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Extracting Rules from Autonomous-Vehicle-Involved Crashes by Applying ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A New Econometric Approach for Modeling Several Count Variables: A Cas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Estimation of crash type frequencies on individual collector roadway s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Driver injury severity analysis of crashes in a western China's rural ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Mid-term prediction of at-fault crash driver frequency using fusion de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The influence of traffic, geometric and context variables on urban cra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A generalized ordered probit model for analyzing driver injury severit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Traffic volume and crashes and how crash and road characteristics affe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Superior side sound localisation performance in a full-chassis driving...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Do we need multivariate modeling approaches to model crash frequency b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Identification of differential risk hotspots for collision and vehicle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Comparison of univariate and two-stage approaches for estimating crash...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Incorporating behavioral variables into crash count prediction by seve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Modeling head-on crash severity on NCDOT freeways: a mixed logit model...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Functional forms of the negative binomial models in safety performance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Predicting crash frequency for multi-vehicle collision types using mul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. A joint econometric approach for modeling crash counts by collision ty...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Multivariate poisson lognormal modeling of crashes by type and severit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. An insight into the performance of road barriers − redistribution of b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Fast Bayesian inference for modeling multivariate crash counts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Predicting the safety impact of a speed limit increase using condition...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Applying the Generalized Waring model for investigating sources of var...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Exploring the effects of roadway characteristics on the frequency and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and fut...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Risk-type density diagrams by crash type on two-lane rural roads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Developing Truck Corridor Crash Severity Index
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Severity Distribution Functions for Freeway Segments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. The negative binomial-Lindley generalized linear model: Characteristic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub