Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Investigating Regression to the Mean in Before-and-After Speed Data Analysis

Abstract

Regression to the mean (RTM) in before-and-after speed data is a purely statistical phenomenon that makes random variation in repeated speed measurements from multiple time points before and after the introduction of an engineering treatment look like a genuine speed change brought about by the engineering treatment. This study shows that an observational before-and-after speed data analysis cannot collect speed measurements without measurement error and cannot be free from RTM bias. To obtain accurate estimates of the magnitude of the mean speed change brought about by an engineering treatment, RTM bias needs to be reduced. This study first uses a graphical method to illustrate the RTM phenomenon and then uses numerical examples (with aggregated speed data) to show how to reduce RTM bias in before-and-after speed data analysis. The numerical examples show that the estimated magnitude of the mean speed change that results from the introduction of an engineering treatment or the amount of uncertainty (measured by the estimated standard error and confidence interval) associated with the mean speed change can be misleading if RTM is not taken into account. The paper concludes with suggestions for more rigorous statistical methods, preferably suited for use with disaggregate speed data, that may help to reduce RTM bias in future speed data analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Galton F. Regression towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, Vol. 15, 1886, pp. 246–263.
2. Barnett A. G., Van Der Pols J. C., and Dobson A. J. Regression to the Mean: What It Is and How to Deal with IT. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 34, 2005, pp. 215–220.
3. Kenneth E. J. Regression toward the Mean in Uncontrolled Clinical Studies, Biometrics 29, 1973, pp. 121–130.
4. Stigler S. M. Regression towards the Mean, Historically Considered. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 6, 1997, pp. 103–114.
5. Chuang-Stein C., and Tong D. M. The Impact and Implication of Regression to the Mean on the Design and Analysis of Medical Investigations. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 6, 1997, pp. 115–128.
6. Council F. M., Reinfurt D. W., Campbell B. J., Roediger F. L., Carroll C. L., Dutt A. K., and Dunham J. R. Accident Research Manual. Final report FHWA-RD-80-016. Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1980.
7. Hauer E. Bias-by-Selection: Overestimation of the Effectiveness of Safety Countermeasures Caused by the Process of Selection for Treatment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 12, No. 2, 1980, pp. 113–117.
8. Persaud B. N. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 295: Statistical Methods in Highway Safety Analysis. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
9. Pendleton O. J. Application of New Accident Analysis Methodologies Volume I—General Methodology. Final report FHWA-RD-90-091, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.
10. Park Y.-J.P., and Saccomanno F. F. Reducing Treatment Selection Bias for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Propensity Score Method. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 2, 2007, pp. 112–118.
11. Monsere C. M., Nolan C., Bertini R. L., Anderson E. L., and El-Seoud T. A. Measuring the Impacts of Speed Reduction Technologies: Evaluation of Dynamic Advanced Curve Warning System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1918, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 98–107.
12. Martin P. T., Perrin J., and Coleman B. Adverse Visibility Information System Evaluation (Advise), Interstate 215 Fog Warning System. Final report UT-02-12. Utah Department of Transportation, Research Division, Salt Lake City, 2003.
13. Cunningham C. M., Hummer J. E., and Moon J.-P. Analysis of Automated Speed Enforcement Cameras in Charlotte, North Carolina, In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2078, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 127–134.
14. Riffkin M., McMurty T., Heath S., and Saito M. Variable Speed Limit Sign Effects on Speed and Speed Variation in Work Zones. Final report UT-08-01. Utah Department of Transportation, Research Division, Salt Lake City, 2008.
15. Najjar Y. M., Stokes R. W., Russell E. R., Ali H. E., and Zhang X. Impact of New Speed Limits on Kansas Highways. Final report K-TRAN: KSU-98-3. Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, 2000.
16. Porter R. J., Donnell E. T., and Mahoney K. M. Evaluation of Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Lateral Vehicle Placement and Speed. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1862, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 10–16.
17. Campbell D. T., and Kenny D. A. A Primer on Regression Artifacts. Guilford Press, New York, 1999.
18. Cook R. J., and Wei W. Selection Effects in Randomized Trials with Count Data. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 21, 2002, pp. 515–531.
19. Finney J. W. Regression to the Mean in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research. Addiction, Vol. 103, 2007, pp. 42–52.
20. Chuang-Stein C. The Regression Fallacy. Drug Information Journal, Vol. 27, 1993, pp. 1213–1220.
21. Curnow R. N. Correction for Regression in Assessing the Response to Treatment in a Selected Population. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 6, 1987, pp. 113–117.
22. Friedman L. S., Hedeker D., and Richter E. D. Long-Term Effects of Repealing the National Maximum Speed Limit in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 99, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1626–1631.
23. Muchuruza V., and Mussa R. N. Speeds on Rural Interstate Highways Relative to Posting the 40 mph Minimum Speed Limit. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 7, Nos. 2-3, 2004, pp. 71–86.
24. Berry D. A., Eaton M. L., Ekholm B. P., and Fox T. L. Assessing Differential Drug Effect. Biometrics, Vol. 40, 1984, pp. 1109–1115.
25. Kelly C., and Travor D. P. Correcting for Regression to the Mean in Behavior and Ecology. The American Naturalist, Vol. 166, No. 6, 2005, pp. 700–707.
26. Bonate P. L. Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2000.
27. Pitman E. J. G. A Note on Normal Correlation. Biometrika, Vol. 31, 1939, pp. 9–12.
28. Park B.-J., Zhang Y., and Lord D. Bayesian Mixture Modeling Approach to Account for Heterogeneity in Speed Data. Transportation Research Part B. Vol. 44, No. 5, 2010, pp. 662–673.
29. Retting R., and Cheung I. Traffic Speed Associated with Implementation of 80 mph Speed Limits on West Texas Rural Interstates. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 39, 2008, pp. 529–534.
30. Park Y., and Saccomanno F. F. Evaluating Speed Consistency Between Successive Elements of a Two-Lane Rural Highway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2006, pp. 375–385.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Peter Y. Park
Department of Civil and Geological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon S7N 5A9, Canada.
Dominique Lord
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 34

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Determination of Sample Size for Speed Measurement on Urban Arterials
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Hotzone identification with GIS-based post-network screening analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Accounting for site-selection bias in before–after studies for continu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Examining the effects of site selection criteria for evaluating the ef...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Safety impact of Gateway Monuments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub