Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Exclusive Truck Facilities in Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Analysis of Truck and Automobile Demand

Abstract

Segregation of truck traffic from passenger traffic through implementation of exclusive truck facilities in key economic corridors can lead to improvements in traffic flow characteristics, safety, and freight efficiency in congested corridors. A model of the 400 series highways around Toronto, Ontario, Canada, assesses alternative configurations of exclusive truck facilities. The demands are based on passenger travel data from a household travel survey, intercity truck travel information from a roadside survey, and urban truck travel information from a three-stage model based on shipper survey data. Origin–destination (O-D) flows are assigned to a regional road network by using a generalized cost multiclass user equilibrium model, and preliminary ramp-to-ramp matrices are extracted from the results of the traffic assignment model. Ramp-to-ramp matrices are improved by using O-D matrix updating. After the O-D matrix updating, observed freeway volumes by vehicle type are replicated very closely in the base case. Converting a lane of mixed traffic to an exclusive truck lane on Highway 401 results in an increase in truck demand and lower truck travel times. Construction of a new exclusive truck highway in an existing hydro corridor through Toronto improves travel times moderately for passenger cars and significantly for medium and heavy trucks.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Meyer M. D. Feasibility of a Metropolitan Truck-Only Toll Lane Network: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia. Presented at First National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, Calif., 2006.
2. PBQD. Truck Only Toll Facilities: Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region: Final Report. State Road and Tollway Authority, Atlanta, Ga., July 2005.
3. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study: Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, March 2007.
4. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study: Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement. Transportation Technical Report. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, 2007.
5. Fischer M. J., Ahanotu D. N., and Waliszewski J. M. Planning Truck-Only Lanes: Emerging Lessons from the Southern California Experience. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1833, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2003, pp. 73–78.
6. Reich S., Davis J., Catala M., Ferraro A., and Concas S. The Potential for Reserved Truck Lanes and Truckways in Florida. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, May 2002.
7. Trans Texas Corridor 35 Oklahoma to Mexico/Gulf Coast Element: Tier One Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2006.
8. I-69 Trans Texas Corridor (Northeast Texas to Mexico) Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Tier One. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Nov. 2007.
9. Fekpe E. Implementation of Exclusive Truck Facilities. Proc. 42nd Annual Meeting of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Quebec City, Canada, 2007.
10. Poole R., and Samuel P. Corridors for Toll Truckways: Suggested Locations for Pilot Projects. Reason Public Policy Institute, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2004.
11. Cambridge Systematics. An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Oct. 2005.
12. Places to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal, Ontario, Canada, 2006.
13. The Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Metrolinx, Toronto, Canada, Nov. 2008.
14. iTrans Consulting Inc. Goods Movement in Central Ontario: Trends and Issues. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Canada, Dec. 2004.
15. Transportation in Canada, 2006: Annual Report. Transport Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2006.
16. Mannering F. L., Koehne J. L., and Araucto J. Truck Restriction Evaluation: The Puget Sound Experience. Washington State Transportation Commission, Olympia, 1993.
17. Taniguchi E., Thompson R. G., Yamada T., and Van Duin R. City Logistics: Network Modeling and Intelligent Transport Systems. Pergamon Press, London, 2001.
18. Highway Traffic Noise. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 1992. www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/htnoise.htm, Accessed July 26, 2009.
19. Roorda M. J., Abdulhai B., and Woudsma C. Truck-Only Transportation Options for the Central GTA Corridor: Analysis of Exclusive Truck Infrastructure Alternatives. Infrastructure Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, June 2009.
20. Abdelgawad H., Abdulhai B., Amirjamshidi G., Wahba M., Woudsma C., and Roorda M. J. Simulation of Exclusive Truck Facilities on Urban Freeways. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
21. Garber N. J., and Liu Q. Identifying the Impact of Truck-Lane Restriction Strategies on Safety Using Simulation. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
22. El-Tantawy S., Djavadian S., Roorda M. J., and Abdulhai B. Safety Evaluation of Truck Lane Restriction Strategies Using Microsimulation Modeling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2099, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2009, pp. 123–131.
23. Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2001 Version 1.0 Data Guide. Data Management Group, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Jan. 2003.
24. Roorda M., McCabe S., and Kwan H. A Shipper-Based Survey of Goods and Services Movements in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto, Sept. 2007.
25. Metropolitan Toronto Goods Movement Study. Roads and Traffic Department, Metropolitan Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1988.
26. Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary: Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2001. Data Management Group, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Nov. 2002.
27. INRO website. 2009. www.inro.ca.
28. GTA Network Coding Standard: 2001 AM Peak EMME2 Integrated Road and Transit Network. Data Management Group, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Sept. 2004.
29. IBI Group. TPM For Multi-Modal Transportation Forecasting Tools For The Greater Golden Horseshoe: Commercial Vehicle Model Phase I. Draft Interim Report Prepared for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Ontario, Canada, July 2007.
30. Fischer M., and Han M. NCHRP Synthesis 298: Truck Trip Generation Data. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
31. Spiess H. A Gradient Approach for the O-D Matrix Adjustment Problem. EMME/2 Support Centre, Aegerten, Switzerland, 1990.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew J. Roorda
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Michael Hain
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Glareh Amirjamshidi
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Rinaldo Cavalcante
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Baher Abdulhai
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Clarence Woudsma
School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 149

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 15

  1. Characterizing long-term NO2 concentration surfaces across a large met...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Weight-categorized truck flow estimation: A data-fusion approach and a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Multi-objective calibration of traffic microsimulation models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Urban land use regression models: can temporal deconvolution of traffi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Characterizing the spatial variability of local and background concent...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Time-dependent congestion pricing system for large networks: Integrati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Development of a land-use regression model for ultrafine particles in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Development of simulated driving cycles for light, medium, and heavy d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The application of wavelet decomposition to quantify the local and reg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Study of Emissions Benefits of Commercial Vehicle Lane Management Stra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Integrated model for microsimulating vehicle emissions, pollutant disp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Truck driver perceptions and preferences: Congestion and conflict, man...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Simulation of Exclusive Truck Facilities on Urban Freeways
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Data collection strategies for benchmarking urban goods movement acros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Improved Time-to-Collision Definition for Simulating Traffic Conflicts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub