Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Mixed-Priority Pedestrian Delay Models at Single-Lane Roundabouts

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to the development of mixed-priority pedestrian delay models at single-lane roundabouts by using behavioral crossing data. “Mixed priority” refers to crosswalk operations in which drivers at times yield to create crossing opportunities but pedestrians may need to rely on their judgment of gaps in traffic to cross the street. The models use probabilistic behavioral parameters measured in controlled pedestrian crossings by blind pedestrians as part of NCHRP Project 3–78a. Although blind pedestrians clearly represent a special population of pedestrians, the developed delay model is structured to apply to any pedestrian population. Delay is predicted as (a) a function of the probability of encountering a crossing opportunity in the form of a yield or crossable gap and (b) the probability of taking that opportunity, and these factors are combined to produce an overall probability of crossing. The paper presents the theoretical approach to estimating the probability parameters and uses a multilinear, log-transformed regression approach to predict the average pedestrian delay. The final delay model explains 64% of the variability in the observed data and therefore represents a reasonable model for predicting pedestrian delay at single-lane roundabouts. The paper concludes with a discussion of how agencies can estimate the underlying probability parameters for existing or proposed roundabouts by using empirical and theoretical approaches and how pedestrian crossing treatments can be used in the context of the model to reduce average pedestrian delay. The research is important in light of the ongoing debate on the accessibility of modern roundabouts to blind pedestrians.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Kittelson and Associates. Roundabout/Traffic Circle Inventory Database. http://roundabout.kittelson.com/Roundabouts. Accessed July 24, 2009.
2. Rodegerdts L., Blogg M., Wemple E., Myers E., Kyte M., Dixon M. P., List G. F., Flannery A., Troutbeck R., Brilon W., Wu N., Persaud B. W., Lyon C., Harkey D. L., and Carter D. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
3. FHWA. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center. FHWA-RD-00-067. McLean, Va., 2000.
4. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
5. Ashmead D., Guth D., Wall R., Long R., and Ponchillia P. Street crossing by sighted and blind pedestrians at a modern roundabout. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, 2005, pp. 812–821.
6. Geruschat D., and Hassan S. Driver Behavior in Yielding to Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at Roundabouts. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 99, No. 5, May 2005.
7. Guth D., Ashmead D., Long R., Wall R., and Ponchillia P., Blind and Sighted Pedestrians' Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts. Human Factors, Vol. 47, 2005, pp. 314–331.
8. Schroeder B. J., and Rouphail N. M. Framework for Evaluating Pedestrian–Vehicle Interactions at Unsignalized Crossing Facilities in a Microscopic Modeling Environment. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
9. Schroeder B. J., Rouphail N. M., and Hughes R. G. Working Concept of Accessibility: Performance Measures for the Usability of Crosswalks by Pedestrians with Vision Impairments. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 103–110.
10. Fitzpatrick K., Turner S. M., Brewer M., Carlson P. J., Ullman B., Trout N. D., Park E. S., Whitacre J., Lalani N., and Lord D. Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. TCRP Report 112/NCHRP Report 562. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. http://onlinepubs.trb.org. Accessed Feb. 2009.
11. Brilon W., Stuwe B., and Drews O. Sicherheit und Leistungsfähigkeit von Kreisverkehrsplätzen (Safety and Capacity of Roundabouts). Research Report. Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany, 1993.
12. U.S. Access Board. Revised Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. 2006. http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm. Accessed July 8, 2008.
13. Schroeder B. A Behavior-Based Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian-Vehicle Interaction at Crosswalk. PhD dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, May 2008.
14. Robertson D., Hummer J., and Nelson D. Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies. Institute for Transportation Engineers. Washington, D.C., 1994.
15. May D. Traffic Flow Theory Fundamental. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 1990.
16. Connelly M., Isler R., and Parsonson B. Child Pedestrians' Judgments of Safe Crossing Gaps at Three Different Vehicle Approach Speeds: A Preliminary Study. Education and Treatment of Children, Vol. 19, 1996, pp. 19–29.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bastian J. Schroeder
Institute of Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Nagui M. Rouphail
Institute of Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 25

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 10

  1. Improving the Digital Modeling Quality of Unsignalized Intersections E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Investigating pedestrian waiting time at semi-controlled crossing loca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Empirical and simulation study of traffic delay at un-signalized cross...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Optimization of Central Island by SITI Equation Developer Inclusive Pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A model of pedestrian delay at unsignalized intersections in urban net...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Analysis of Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections Based on Ped...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Event-Based Modeling of Driver Yielding Behavior to Pedestrians at Two...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Cellular Automaton Modeling of the Interaction between Vehicles and Pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Effect of Pedestrian Impedance on Vehicular Capacity at Multilane Roun...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Analytical Method for Estimating Delays to Vehicles Traversing Single-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub