Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Markets for Dynamic Ridesharing?: Case of Berkeley, California

Abstract

Ridesharing programs are widespread across the United States. Dynamic ridesharing is a newer way to share rides on the fly or up to several days in advance using cell phone or computer messaging to make arrangements. This paper describes research conducted to assess the potential for dynamic ridesharing for travel to downtown Berkeley, California, and the University of California, Berkeley, campus. The study provides insights about the opportunities and challenges presented by this travel option. Data were collected from statistical and geographic analysis of the downtown and campus travel markets, and surveys and focus groups were administered to employees and graduate students. The study found that about one-fifth of commuters who drive alone to the campus would be interested in using dynamic ridesharing at least occasionally and live in areas where matches could be found. They would prefer to arrange a shared ride at least the night before rather than immediately before the trip is made. Many of these travelers were unaware of current rideshare services, and some would be willing to find a regular carpool partner. Finally, if parking charges are fairly high and parking supply is limited and regulated, financial incentives and carpool parking subsidies greatly increase interest in dynamic ridesharing.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates. Ride Now! Evaluation Draft Final Report. Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, Oakland, Calif., 2006.
2. Guiliano G., Hall R. W., and Golob J. M. Los Angeles Smart Traveler Field Operational Test Evaluation. California PATH Research Report PRR-95–41. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1995.
3. Haselkorn M., Spryidakis J., Blumenthal C., Michalak S., Goble B., and Garner M. Bellevue Smart Traveler: Design, Demonstration, and Assessment. Final technical report. Publication FTA-WA-0039-95-1. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 1995.
4. Dailey D. J., Loseff D., Meyers D., and Haselkorn M. Seattle Smart Traveler. Presented at 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1997.
6. Li J., Embry P. M., Mattingly S. P., Sadabadi K. F., Rasmidatta I., and Burris M. W. Who Chooses to Carpool and Why? Examination of Texas Carpoolers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2021, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 110–117.
7. Office of Student Research. UC Faculty and Staff Housing and Transportation Survey. Department of Physical and Environmental Planning, University of California, Berkeley, 2001.
8. Shirgaokar M., and Deakin E. Study of Park-and-Ride Facilities and Their Use in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 46–54.
9. Deakin E., Frick K. T., and Skabardonis A. Intelligent Transport Systems: Linking Technology and Transport Policy to Help Steer the Future. Access, No. 34, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Elizabeth Deakin
City and Regional Planning Department, University of California, Berkeley, 228 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1782.
Karen Trapenberg Frick
University of California Transportation Center and California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, 2614 Dwight Way, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Kevin M. Shively
Nelson–Nygaard Consulting Associates, 785 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 237

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 42

  1. How Do People Prefer Ridesplitting? A Survey Study Focusing on Passeng...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A cross-cultural study of nonprofit self-organized ridesharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A Traveler Incentive Program for Promoting Community-Based Ridesharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A framework for estimating commute accessibility and adoption of rideh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Day-to-day dynamics in a duopoly ride-sourcing market
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Security and Privacy Issues in Autonomous Vehicles: A Layer-Based Surv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A systematic literature review of ride-sharing platforms, user factors...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Rider Perceptions of an On-Demand Microtransit Service in Salt Lake Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Ridesharing Organization for Transfer...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. From Empirical Data to Operational Models: An Approach for the Develop...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. An Assessment of Public and Private Transport Competitiveness in Jakar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Learning from the real practices of users of a smart carpooling app
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Carporeality/Carhesia: Whereupon the Road to Erewhon
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Pricing and allocation algorithm designs in dynamic ridesharing system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Where did Kutsuplus drive us? Ex post evaluation of on-demand micro-tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. When is it beneficial to provide freelance suppliers with choice? A hi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Toward using social media to support ridesharing services: challenges ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Regulation of taxis and the rise of ridesharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Rider-to-rider discriminatory attitudes and ridesharing behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Who is Interested in Carpooling and Why: The Importance of Individual ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The effects of ride-hailing companies on the taxicab industry in Las V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Driver-Rider Cost-Sharing Strategies and Equilibria in a Ridesharing P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Algorithm Designs for Dynamic Ridesharing System
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. An empirical study on travel patterns of internet based ride-sharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. How much is trust: The cost and benefit of ridesharing with friends
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Optimal Pick up Point Selection for Effective Ride Sharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Building more parking at major employment centers: Can full-cost recov...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Incorporating Ridesharing in the Static Traffic Assignment Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Activity-based ridesharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. The Future of Paratransit and DRT: Introducing Cars on Demand
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Products and services in new economic forms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Modeling the demand for a shared-ride taxi service: An application to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Propensity to participate in a peer-to-peer social-network-based carpo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Potential of Carpooling among Unfamiliar Users: Case of Undergraduate ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. The Economics of Multi-Hop Ride Sharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Testing personalized outreach as an effective TDM measure
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. The impact of targeted outreach for parking mitigation on the UC Berke...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. “Not just a taxi”? For-profit ridesharing, driver strategies, and VMT
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Reducing parking demand and traffic congestion at the American Univers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. THE AVAILABILITY OF RIDE-SHARE AS THE TRAVEL MODE FOR TRANSPORTATION-P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Causal Exploration of Bike Accidents in the Bay Area
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub