Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Operational Evaluation of Wireless Magnetometer Vehicle Detectors at Signalized Intersection

Abstract

Compact wireless magnetometers offer attractive vehicle detection ability at signalized intersections because their installation requires minimal pavement cutting and the detectors are less likely than saw-cut inductive loops to malfunction because of pavement failure. A study was done at an instrumented intersection to evaluate the performance of wireless magnetometers at operating signalized intersections. A test bed was constructed with colocated inductive loop and wireless magnetometer detection zones. A 5-day analysis period was conducted for each of two left-turn pockets at an actuated, coordinated signalized intersection. Discrepancies between the detection and nondetection states were quantified with highresolution log data of traffic events, and 240 h of data collection that was ground-truthed by visual inspection of video recordings of the detection zones. Behavior of detector state changes was also characterized. Wireless magnetometers were found to perform similarly to loops in relation to missed calls and had a slightly higher tendency to generate false detection calls. Detection state changes in the wireless magnetometers had typical (85th percentile) reporting latencies of 0.2 s or less for activation and 0.5 s or less for state termination. The paper concludes by recommending 8-ft spacing of the sensors adjacent to the stop bar to minimize missed calls.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cheung S. Y., Coleri S., Dundar B., Ganesh S., Tan C.-W., and Varaiya P. Traffic Measurement and Vehicle Classification with Single Magnetic Sensor. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1917, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 173–181.
2. Haoui A., Kavaler R., and Varaiya P. Wireless Magnetic Sensors for Traffic Surveillance. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 294–306.
3. Margulici J. D., Yang S., and Tan C.-W. Evaluation of Wireless Traffic Sensors by Sensys Networks, Inc. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2006.
4. Cheung S.-Y., and Varaiya P. Traffic Surveillance by Wireless Sensor Networks: Final Report. UCB-ITS-PRR-2007-4. University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
5. Abbas M., and Bonneson J. Video Detection for Intersection and Interchange Control. FHWA/TX-03/4285-1. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation, College Station, and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
6. MacCarley C. A., and Palen J. Evaluation of Video Traffic Sensors for Intersection Signal Actuation: Methods and Metrics. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
7. Rhodes A., Bullock D. M., Sturdevant J. R., Clark Z., and Candey D. G. Jr., Evaluation of the Accuracy of Stop Bar Video Detection at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1925, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 134–145.
8. Tian Z. Z., and Abbas M. M. Models for Quantitative Assessment of Video Detection System Impacts on Signalized Intersection Operations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2035, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 50–58.
9. Rhodes A., Jennings K., and Bullock D. Consistencies of Video Detection Activation and De-activation Times Between Day and Night Periods. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 9, Sept. 2007, pp. 505–512.
10. Rhodes A., Smaglik E., Bullock D. M., and Sturdevant J. Operational Performance Comparison of Video Detection Systems. Proc. 2007 ITE International Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Pittsburgh, Pa., Aug. 5–8, 2007.
11. Middleton D., Longmire R., Bullock D. M., and Sturdevant J. R. Proposed Concept for Specifying Vehicle Detection Performance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2128, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 161–172.
12. Medina J. C., Chitturi M. V., and Benekohal R. F. Illumination and Wind Effects on Video Detection Performance at Signalized Intersections. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
13. Medina J. C., Chitturi M. V., and Benekohal R. F. Impact of Snow on Video Detection Systems at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Circular E-C126: Surface Transportation Weather and Snow Removal and Ice Control Technology: Fourth National Conference on Surface Transportation Weather and Seventh International Symposium on Snow Removal and Ice Control Technology, June 16–19, 2008, Indianapolis, Indiana. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 469–479, 2008. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/circulars/ec126.pdf.
14. Medina J. C., Benekohal R. F., and Chitturi M. V. Changes in Video Detection Performance at Signalized Intersections Under Different Illumination Conditions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2129, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 111–120.
15. Procedure for Evaluating Vehicle Detection Performance. ITM 934-08P. Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, Jan. 2008. http://www.in.gov/indot/div/M&T/itm/pubs/934_testing.pdf.
16. Ernst J. M., Ault A., Krogmeier J. V., and Bullock D. M. Recommended Tolerances for Magnetometer Orientation and Field Calibration Procedure. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2128, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 66–75.
17. Day C. M., Brennan T. M. Jr., Harding M. L., Premachandra H., Jacobs A., Bullock D. M., Krogmeier J. V., and Sturdevant J. R. Three-Dimensional Mapping of Inductive Loop Detector Sensitivity with Field Measurement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2128, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 35–47.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher M. Day
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
Hiromal Premachandra
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
Thomas M. Brennan, Jr.
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
James R. Sturdevant
Indiana Department of Transportation, 100 North Senate Avenue, Room N925, Indianapolis, IN 46204.
Darcy M. Bullock
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 24

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 17

  1. A magnetometer smart parking sensor: A new model design
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A Coordinated Adaptive Traffic Control Strategy Based on Phase-Time Ne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Actuated Traffic Signal Performance Evaluation along Arterials using W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Performance of Wireless Magnetometers for Stop Bar Detection at Signal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Use of High-Resolution Signal Controller Data to Identify Red Light Ru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A Novel Dual Traffic/Flash Flood Monitoring System Using Passive Infra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Vehicle Detection and Classification Using Passive Infrared Sensing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. WARIM: Wireless Sensor Networks Architecture for a Reliable Intersecti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A Proposal of Risk Indexes at Signalised Intersections for ADAS Aimed ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Estimating Required Probe Vehicle Re-identification Requirements for C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. An Efficient Multiple-Loop Sensor Configuration Applicable for Undisci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Roundabout Critical Headway Measurement Based on High-Resolution Event...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Wireless sensor networks for traffic monitoring in a logistic centre
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Kullback-Leibler comparison framework for the evaluation of travel tim...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Maximum-Likelihood Acceleration Estimation From Existing Roadway Vehic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Acceleration Estimation and Signature Matching Travel Time Estimation ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Detection Performance of Wireless Magnetometers at Signalized Intersec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub