Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Constructing Transit Origin–Destination Tables from Fragmented Data

Abstract

This study proposes an approach that constructs the origin–destination table (O-D table) for urban bus or light rail lines from fragmented data about the number of boarding and alighting passengers at stops (B-A data) and the analyst's spot knowledge about the trip pattern for selected O-D pairs. The B-A data of transit lines in the city center are often incomplete, yet they may be the only data available to characterize the passenger travel pattern. The proposed approach constructs the O-D table by using data that contain different levels of uncertainties and incompleteness. The model is based on two basic principles, maximum uncertainty and minimum uncertainty. The former is implemented by maximizing the entropy of the O-D table to derive the least-biased values. The latter refers to the maximum consistency with the available data including language-based knowledge about some of the O-D table elements. These principles are implemented by the multiobjective optimization structure. The model is found to be robust if it can incorporate various types of available data as well as the analyst's knowledge. It was tested by using O-D data and B-A data from an actual transit operation. The quality of the derived O-D table is clearly related to the availability and the quality of the data; however, it can be improved significantly with the analyst's spot knowledge about the values of selected O-D pairs. This method will open the way for transit planners to quickly develop a reasonable O-D table from the available incomplete data.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Kikuchi S., and Kronprasert N. Constructing a Transit Origin–Destination Table Using the Uncertainty Maximization Concept. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2112, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 43–52.
2. Barry J. J., Newhouser R., Rahbee A., and Sayeda S. Origin and Destination Estimation in New York City with Automated Fare System Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1817, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 183–187.
3. Zhao J., Rahbee A., and Wilson N. H. M. Estimating a Passenger Trip Origin Destination Matrix Using Automatic Data Collection Systems. In Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Mass., 2007, pp. 376–387.
4. Farzin J. M. Constructing an Automated Bus Origin–Destination Matrix Using Farecard and Global Positioning System Data in Sao Paulo, Brazil. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2072, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 30–37.
5. Kikuchi S., Mangalpally S., and Gupta A. Method for Balancing Observed Boarding and Alighting Counts on a Transit Line. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1971, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 43–50.
6. Furth P. G., Strathman J. G., and Hemily B. Making Automatic Passenger Counts Mainstream: Accuracy, Balancing Algorithms, and Data Structures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 207–216.
7. Rainville W. S. Jr., Bus Scheduling Manual: Traffic Checking and Schedule Preparation. U.S. Department of Transportation in cooperation with American Transit Association, original 1947, reprinted 1982.
8. Kittleton Associates, KFH Group, Inc., Parson Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., and Katherine Hunter-Zaworski. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
9. Boyle D. K., Pappas J., Boyle P., Nelson B., Sharfarz D., and Benn H. TCRP Report 135: Controlling System Costs: Basic and Advanced Scheduling Manuals and Contemporary Issues in Transit Scheduling. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
10. Klir G. J., and Wierman M. J. Uncertainty-Based Information: Elements of Generalized Information Theory (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing), 2nd ed. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
11. Klir G. J. Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2006.
12. Optimization Modeling with LINGO, 6th ed. LINDO Systems, Inc., Chicago, Ill., 2006.
13. Kikuchi S., Miljkovic D., and van Zuylen H. J. Examination of Methods That Adjust Observed Traffic Volumes on a Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1717, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 109–119.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shinya Kikuchi
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, National Capital Region, 7054 Haycock Road, Falls Church, VA 22043.
Nopadon Kronprasert
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, National Capital Region, 7054 Haycock Road, Falls Church, VA 22043.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Transit Route Origin–Destination Matrix Estimation using Compressed Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Design of Priority Transportation Corridor Under Uncertainty
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub