Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Calibrated Labeling Method for Generating Bicyclist Route Choice Sets Incorporating Unbiased Attribute Variation

Abstract

Discrete choice model estimation requires specification of the alternatives considered for each observed choice. In route choice problems based on real-world travel observations, generally only the chosen route is observed, and the rest of the choice set remains hidden from the analyst. In dense travel networks, thousands of paths may connect a given origin or destination, necessitating methods for generating a reasonable subset of options. A new method is proposed for generating deterministic route choice sets. The technique modifies the labeled routes method, in which multiple criteria are optimized individually to generate attractive routes. The proposed method offers two potential improvements: (a) multiple routes are generated for each label by allowing a sensitivity parameter to vary and (b) a calibration step fits the alternative shortest path deviation distribution to observed behavior. The resulting process is more flexible than traditional labeled routes, yet it maintains strong links to behavior and reduces potential attribute bias. The proposed calibrated labeling method is applied to bicyclist route choice in a dense urban network. Results suggest that the proposed technique outperforms existing methods on several key criteria. In addition, explicitly linking choice set generation to observed travel patterns creates a more intuitive behavioral link than existing strategies. The proposed method should be immediately useful for route choice modeling in similar contexts. Furthermore, the basic framework could be more broadly applicable for route choice set generation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Prato C. G., and Bekhor S. Applying Branch-and-Bound Technique to Route Choice Set Generation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 19–28.
2. Bovy P. H. L. On Modelling Route Choice Sets in Transportation Networks: A Synthesis. Transport Reviews, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2009, pp. 43–68.
3. Ramming S. Network Knowledge and Route Choice. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
4. Cascetta E., Nuzzolo A., Russo F., and Vitetta A. A Modified Logit Route Choice Model Overcoming Path Overlapping Problems: Specification and Some Calibration Results for Interurban Networks. Proc. 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France, 1996, pp. 697–711.
5. Bekhor S., Ben-Akiva M. E., and Ramming M. S. Evaluation of Choice Set Generation Algorithms for Route Choice Models. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 144, No. 1, 2006, pp. 235–247.
6. Frejinger E., Bierlaire M., and Ben-Akiva M. Sampling of Alternatives for Route Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part B (in press).
7. Ben-Akiva M. E., Bergman M. J., Daly A. J., and Ramaswamy R. Modelling Inter Urban Route Choice Behavior. Proc. Ninth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, VNU Science Press, Delft, Netherlands, 1984, pp. 299–330.
8. Cascetta E., Russo F., Viola F. A., and Vitetta A. Random Utility Models with Implicit Availability/Perception of Choice Alternatives for the Simulation of Travel Demand. Transport Research Part C, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2002, pp. 249–263.
9. Prato C. G., and Bekhor S. Modeling Route Choice Behavior: How Relevant Is the Composition of Choice Set? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 64–73.
10. Bekhor S., and Prato C. G. Methodological Transferability in Route Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 422–437.
11. Chakravarti I. M., Laha R. G., and Roy J. Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics, Vol. 1, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1967, pp. 392–394.
12. Dill J., and Gliebe J. Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: A Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice. Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium, Portland State University. Dec. 2008. http://www.otrec.us/main/document.php?doc_id=966. Accessed July 23.
13. Stinson M. A., and Bhat C. R. Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 107–115.
14. Hunt J. D., and Abraham J. E. Influences on Bicycle Use. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2007, pp. 453–470.
15. Daskin M. S. Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995.
16. Ben-Akiva M. E., and Bierlaire M. Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions. In Handbook of Transportation Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999, pp. 5–33.
17. Bierlaire M. Biogeme: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models. Proc. Third Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2003.
18. Bierlaire M. An Introduction to Biogeme Version 1.7. 2008. http://biogeme.epfl.ch.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Joseph Broach
Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.
John Gliebe
Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.
Jennifer Dill
Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 182

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 21

  1. Improved Random Walk Method Verified in a Large-Scale Urban Network fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. RCMVis: A Visual Analytics System for Route Choice Modeling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Bi-level clustering of vehicle trajectories for path choice set and it...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Refined choice set generation and the investigation of multi-criteria ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or Mor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Estimation of link‐cost function for cyclists based on stochastic opti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Bicycle Ridership Using Crowdsourced Data: Ordered Probit Model Approa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Road environments and bicyclist route choice: The cases of Davis and S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Performance evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for analyzi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Bike network design problem with a path-size logit-based equilibrium c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The relation of the road environment and bicycling attitudes to usual ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Bicycle Level of Service for Route Choice—A GIS Evaluation of Four Exi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Shortest path distance vs. least directional change: Empirical testing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Using CyclePhilly data to assess wrong-way riding of cyclists in Phila...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Bicycle-Route Choice Model Incorporating Distance and Perceived Risk
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. A GPS data-based analysis of built environment influences on bicyclist...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  18. Retail gravitation and economic impact: A market-driven analytical fra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Pedestrian environment and route choice: evidence from New York City a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Causal Exploration of Bike Accidents in the Bay Area
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub