Safety Effectiveness of Leading Pedestrian Intervals Evaluated by a Before–After Study with Comparison Groups
Abstract
Strategies to reduce pedestrian–vehicle crashes at intersections should be investigated. Implementation of the leading pedestrian interval (LPI) has been recommended as a strategy for reducing pedestrian–vehicle crashes at signalized intersections; however, research on quantification of the safety effects of the LPI has been limited. Site characteristics, traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, and crash data were obtained for 10 signalized intersections where the LPI was implemented in State College, Pennsylvania. Similar data were obtained for 14 stop-controlled intersections within the State College area. A before–after with comparison group study design was used to evaluate the safety effectiveness of the LPI implementations. The results suggest a 58.7% reduction in pedestrian–vehicle crashes at treated intersections, which is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. An economic analysis was also conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of the strategy. Given the low cost of this strategy, only a modest reduction in crashes is needed to justify its use economically. On the basis of the estimated safety effectiveness, the necessary crash reduction is easily achievable.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Traffic Safety Facts 2006. NHTSA, Washington, D.C. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/TSF2006FE.PDF. Accessed July 28, 2008.
2. NCHRP Report 500, Vol. 10. A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Pedestrians. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
3. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Frequently Asked Questions. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/knowledge/faqs/faq_part4.htm. Accessed July 24, 2008.
4. Hubbard S. M. L., Awwad R. J., and Bullock D. M. Assessing the Impact of Turning Vehicles on Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalized Intersections: A New Perspective. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2027, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 27–36.
5. Guidelines and Recommendations to Accommodate Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Publication FHWA-RD-01-051. Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2001.
6. Van Houten R., Retting R. A., Farmer C. M., and Van Houten J. Field Evaluation of a Leading Pedestrian Interval Signal Phase at Three Urban Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1734, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 86–92.
7. Pedestrian Safety Countermeasure Deployment Project. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/ped/ped_scdproj/sf_ch1.htm. Accessed July 24, 2008.
8. Making Crosswalks Safer for Pedestrians. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2000.
9. King M. R. Calming New York City Intersections. Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
10. Intersection Safety Issues Brief No. 8: Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer. ITE and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
11. Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness for Pedestrian Crashes. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
12. Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors. Publication FHWA-SA-07-015. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
13. PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. Publication FHWA-SA-04-003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
14. Hauer E. Observational Before–After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
15. Persaud B. N. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 295: Statistical Methods in Highway Safety Analysis. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
16. Council F., Zaloshnja E., Miller T., and Persaud B. Crash Cost Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity Within Selected Crash Geometries. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2005.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 231
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 26
- Do Traffic Countermeasures Improve the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users...
- How transit improvements are perceived by passengers? Results of a bef...
- Leading pedestrian intervals – Yay or Nay? A Before-After evaluation o...
- Assessing the effectiveness of built environment-based safety measures...
- The effectiveness of built environment interventions embedded in road ...
- Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash ris...
- Assessing the Effectiveness of Built Environment-based Safety Measures...
- Evaluation of Protected Left-Turn Phasing and Leading Pedestrian Inter...
- Active Strategy to Improve the Right-Turn Capacity at Signalized Inter...
- The effects of left-turn traffic-calming treatments on conflicts and s...
- A hierarchical bayesian peak over threshold approach for conflict-base...
- Influence of green signal countdown timer on severe crash types at sig...
- Distracted by “distracted pedestrians”?
- Leading Through Intervals versus Leading Pedestrian Intervals: More Pr...
- A justification for pedestrian countdown signals at signalized interse...
- Evaluation of Driver Comprehension and Visual Attention of the Flashin...
- A review on safety failures, security attacks, and available counterme...
- Is the safety-in-numbers effect still observed in areas with low pedes...
- A comparison of safety benefits of pedestrian countdown signals with a...
- Who has more walkable routes to parks? An environmental justice study ...
- Road Users
- Managing User Delay with a Focus on Pedestrian Operations
- Safety impacts of platform tram stops on pedestrians in mixed traffic ...
- Leading Pedestrian Interval: Assessment and Implementation Guidelines
- Inadequate compensation and multiple equilibria
- Pedestrians
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
