Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts: Context for Before-and-After Studies

Abstract

This paper presents a novel application of automated video analysis for a before-and-after (BA) safety evaluation of a scramble phase treatment. Data availability has been a common challenge to pedestrian studies, especially for proactive safety analysis. The traditional reliance on collision data has many shortcomings because of the quality and quantity of collision records. Qualitative and quantitative issues with road collision data are more pronounced in pedestrian safety studies. In addition, little information on the mechanism of action implicated can be drawn from collision reports. Traffic conflict techniques have been advocated as supplements or alternatives to collision-based safety analysis. Automated conflict analysis has been advocated as a new safety analysis paradigm that empowers the drawbacks of survey-based and observer-based traffic conflict analysis. One of the areas of focus of pedestrian safety that could greatly benefit from vision-based road user tracking is BA evaluation of safety treatments. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a BA analysis with video data collected from a commercial-grade camera in Chinatown, Oakland, California. Video sequences for a period of 2 h before and 2 h after scramble were automatically analyzed. The BA results of the automated analysis exhibit a declining pattern of conflict frequency, a reduction in the spatial density of conflicts, and a shift in the spatial distribution of conflicts farther from crosswalks.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Greene-Roesel R., Diogenes M. C., and Ragland D. Estimating Pedestrian Accident Exposure: Protocol Report. Traffic Safety Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
2. Saunier N., and Sayed T. A. Automated Road Safety Analysis with Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 57–64.
3. Lam W. H. K., Morrall J. F., and Ho H. Pedestrian Flow Characteristics in Hong Kong. In Transportation Research Record 1487, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 56–62.
4. AlGhadi S., Mahmassani H. S., and Herman R. A Speed–Concentration Relation for Bi-Directional Crowd Movements with Strong Interaction. Proc. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002, pp. 3–20.
5. Ismail K., Sayed T., Saunier N., and Lim C. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 44–54.
6. Forsyth D. A., Arikan O., Ikemoto L., O'Brien J., and Ramanan D. Computational Studies of Human Motion. Part 1. Tracking and Motion Synthesis. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 77–254.
7. Chae K., and Rouphail N. M. Empirical Study of Pedestrian–Vehicle Interactions in the Vicinity of Single-Lane Roundabouts. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
8. Ismail K., Sayed T., and Saunier N. Automated Collection of Pedestrian Data Using Computer Vision Techniques. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
9. Malinovskiy Y., Zheng J., and Wang Y. Model-Free Video Detection and Tracking of Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2008, pp. 157–168.
10. Midenet L., and Boudet S. Pedestrian Crossing Detection Based on Evidential Fusion of Video-Sensors. Transportation Research, Part C: Emerging Technologies. Vol. 17, No. 5, 2009, pp. 484–497.
11. Chin H. C., and Quek S. T. Measurement of Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 26, 1997, pp. 169–185.
12. Svensson Å., and Hydén C. Estimating the Severity of Safety Related Behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 379–385.
13. Cynecki M. J. Development of Conflicts Analysis Technique for Pedestrian Crossings. In Transportation Research Record 743, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 12–20.
14. Pulugurtha S. S., and Repaka S. R. Assessment of Models to Measure Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 39–48.
15. Hua J., Gutierrez N., Banerjee I., Markowitz F., and Ragland D. R. San Francisco PedSafe II Project Outcomes and Lessons Learned. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
16. Amundsen F., and Hydén C. (eds.). Proc., First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1977.
17. Glauz W. D., Bauer K. M., and Migletz D. J. Expected Traffic Conflict Rates and Their Use in Predicting Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1026, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 1–12.
18. Hayward J. C. Near-Miss Determination Through Use of a Scale of Danger. In Highway Research Record 384, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1972, pp. 24–34.
19. Bechtel A., MacLeod K., and Ragland D. Oakland Chinatown Pedestrian Scramble: An Evaluation. Final report. Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
20. Van Houten R., Malenfant J. E. L., Van Houten J., and Retting R. A. Using Auditory Pedestrian Signals to Reduce Pedestrian and Vehicle Conflicts. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 20–22.
21. Tourinho L. F. B., and Pietrantonio H. Parameters for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety Problems in Signalised Intersections Using the Traffic Conflict Analysis Technique—A Study in Sao Paolo, Brazil. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 29, 2003, pp. 183–216.
22. Huybers S., Van Houten R., and Malenfant J. E. L. Reducing Conflicts Between Motor Vehicles and Pedestrians: The Separate and Combined Effects of Pavement Markings and a Sign Prompt. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 37, 2004, pp. 445–456.
23. Malkhamah S., Miles T., and Montgomery F. The Development of an Automatic Method of Safety Monitoring at Pelican Crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, 2005, pp. 938–946.
24. Medina J. C., Benekohal R. F., and Wang M.-H. In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Signs and Effects on Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts at University Campus Crosswalks. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
25. Gårder P. Pedestrian Safety at Traffic Signals: A Study Carried out with the Help of a Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 21, 1989, pp. 435–444.
26. Kattan L., Acharjee S., and Tay R. Pedestrian Scramble Operations: Pilot Study in Calgary, Alberta. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 79–84.
27. Turner S. M., Fitzpatrick K., Brewer M. A., and Park E. S. Motorist Yielding to Pedestrians at Unsignalized Intersections: Findings from a National Study on Improving Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1982, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 1–12.
28. Vaziri B. Exclusive Pedestrian Phase for the Business District Signals in Beverly Hills: 10 Years Later. ITE, Washington, D.C., 1989.
29. Abrams C. M., and Smith S. A. Selection of Pedestrian Signal Phasing. In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 1–6.
30. Malinovskiy Y., Wu Y.-J., and Wang Y. Video-Based Monitoring of Pedestrian Movements at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 11–17.
31. Saunier N., and Sayed T. A Feature-Based Tracking Algorithm for Vehicles in Intersections. Presented at Third Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, IEEE, Quebec, Quebec, Canada, June 2006.
32. Kilambi P., Ribnick E., Joshi A. J., Masoud O., and Papanikolopoulos N. Estimating Pedestrian Counts in Groups. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 110, 2008, pp. 43–59.
33. Ismail K., Sayed T., and Saunier N. Automated Pedestrian Safety Analysis Using Video Data in the Context of Scramble Phase Intersections. Presented at Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009.
34. Saunier N., Sayed T., and Lim C. Probabilistic Collision Prediction for Vision-Based Automated Road Safety Analysis. Presented at 10th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Seattle, Wash., 2007.
35. Vlachos M., Kollios G., and Gunopulos D. Elastic Translation Invariant Matching of Trajectories. Machine Learning, Vol. 58, 2005, pp. 301–334.
36. Saunier N., Sayed T., and Ismail K. An Object Assignment Algorithm for Tracking Performance Evaluation. Proc. Eleventh IEEE International Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance, 2009, pp. 9–16.
37. Allen B. L., Shin B. T., Cooper P. J., and Parker M. R. Jr. Analysis of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions. In Transportation Research Record 667, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 67–74.
38. Archer J. Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Traffic Safety at Urban Intersections and Their Application in Micro-Simulation Modelling. PhD thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Karim Ismail
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Department of Civil Engineering, Carleton University, 1125-3432 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.
Tarek Sayed
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Nicolas Saunier
Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, C.P. 6079, succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 470

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 117

  1. Transit Safety System Evaluation and Hotspot Identification Empowered ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Leading pedestrian intervals – Yay or Nay? A Before-After evaluation o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Microscopic modeling of cyclists interactions with pedestrians in shar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Modeling lateral interactions between motorized vehicles and non-motor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Do road users play Nash Equilibrium? A comparison between Nash and Log...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Analysis of Path Distribution Characteristics and Safety Impact of Ped...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A critical review on pedestrian crossing behaviour and pedestrian-vehi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Pedestrian safety analysis of urban intersections in Kolkata, India us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Multi-criteria comparative assessment of unconventional roundabout des...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Non-compliance behaviour of pedestrians and the associated conflicts a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Study of automated shuttle interactions in city traffic using surrogat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Real-Time Pedestrian Conflict Prediction Model at the Signal Cycle Lev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Investigating consecutive conflicts of pedestrian crossing at unsignal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Effect of Redesigning Public Shared Space Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Multi-type Bayesian hierarchical modeling of traffic conflict extremes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Investigating the transferability of Bayesian hierarchical extreme val...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Markov-game modeling of cyclist-pedestrian interactions in shared spac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Evaluation of pedestrian critical gap and crossing speed at midblock c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. VIFECO: An Open-Source Software for Counting Features on a Video
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Road Safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Investigating temporal variations in pedestrian crossing behavior at s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Combining Reachability Analysis and Importance Sampling for Accelerate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Modeling pedestrians’ near-accident events at signalized intersections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Proposal of a Smart Pedestrian Monitoring System based on Characterist...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. A hierarchical bayesian peak over threshold approach for conflict-base...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Vision-Based Personal Safety Messages (PSMs) Generation for Connected ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Using PET-Measured Traffic Conflicts to Analyze Safety Performance of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Enhancing unsupervised video-based vehicle tracking and modeling for t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Video Analysis of Pedestrian Movement (VAPM) under Different Lighting ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. How does weather and climate affect pedestrian walking speed during co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Prediction of Pedestrian Crossing Intentions at Intersections Based on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Evaluating pedestrian vehicle interaction dynamics at un-signalized in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluation o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. A Review of Research on Traffic Conflicts Based on Intelligent Vehicle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Microscopic behavioural analysis of cyclist and pedestrian interaction...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Detecting Pedestrian Crossing Events in Large Video Data from Traffic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. A full Bayes approach for traffic conflict-based before–after safety e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Can Automated Vehicles Improve Cyclist Safety in Urban Areas?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Full Bayesian conflict-based models for real time safety evaluation of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Investigating secondary pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. From univariate to bivariate extreme value models: Approaches to integ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Analysis of Pedestrian Conflict with Right-Turning Vehicles at Signali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Application of Extreme Value Theory for Before-After Road Safety Analy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. A comparison between simulated and field-measured conflicts for safety...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Analysis of risk-taking behaviors of electric bicycle riders in respon...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Assessing the Effect of Pedestrians’ Use of Cell Phones on Their Walki...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Before-after safety analysis using extreme value theory: A case of lef...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Automated class identification of modes of travel in shared spaces: a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. An efficient soft computing-based calibration method for microscopic s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Large-Scale Automated Extraction of Built Environment Characteristics ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. How is driving volatility related to intersection safety? A Bayesian h...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. The Safety Impact of Additional Blue Lights of Rescue Vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Analysing cyclist behaviour at cycling facility discontinuities using...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian Group Behavior in Urban Settings
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Traffic conflict models to evaluate the safety of signalized intersect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. A Cost-Effective Framework for Automated Vehicle-Pedestrian Near-Miss ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Investigation of safety analysis methods using computer vision techniq...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Automated analysis of pedestrian walking behaviour at a signalised int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Looking at Intersections: A Survey of Intersection Monitoring, Behavio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. A robust approach for road users classification using the motion cues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framew...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Development of a comprehensive framework for video-based safety assess...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. A comparison between PARAMICS and VISSIM in estimating automated field...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Safety evaluation of unconventional outside left-turn lane using autom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Estimating potential conflicts between right-turn-on-red vehicles and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Computer vision approach for the classification of bike type (motorize...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Exploring walking gait features for the automated recognition of distr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Analysis of Road User Behavior and Safety During New York City’s Summe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Automated Pedestrians Data Collection Using Computer Vision
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for saf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Large-scale automated proactive road safety analysis using video data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Automated classification based on video data at intersections with hea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. The use of gait parameters to evaluate pedestrian behavior at scramble...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Automated Analysis and Validation of Right-Turn Merging Behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Behavioural analysis of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Simulated Traffic Conflicts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Assessing Safety Improvements to Pedestrian Crossings Using Automated ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Automated Pedestrian Safety Analysis at a Signalized Intersection in N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Can Time Proximity Measures be Used as Safety Indicators in All Drivin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Automated Region-Based Vehicle Conflict Detection Using Computer Visio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Safety Quantification of Intersections Using Computer Vision Technique...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Optimization of pedestrian phase patterns at signalized intersections:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian Crossing Speed Behavior at Scramble-p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Scene‐based pedestrian safety performance model in mixed traffic situa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Pedestrian gait analysis using automated computer vision techniques
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Automated Analysis of Pedestrians’ Nonconforming Behavior and Data Col...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Safety Performance Study of Shared Pedestrian and Vehicle Space in New...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Computer Vision Techniques to Collect Helmet-Wearing Data on Cyclists
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. The Microscopic Simulation Based on Conflict of Pedestrian Crossing St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Automated safety diagnosis of vehicle–bicycle interactions using compu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. An automated surrogate safety analysis at protected highway ramps usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. A framework for automated road-users classification using movement tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Classifying Road Users in Urban Scenes Using Movement Patterns
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Analysis on Traffic Conflicts of Two-lane Highway Based on Improved Ce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Flexible, Mobile Video Camera System and Open Source Video Analysis So...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Analysis of Pedestrian Performance in Shared-Space Environments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Traffic Conflicts in Street Designs wit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Application of Computer Vision to Diagnosis of Pedestrian Safety Issue...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. A methodology for precise camera calibration for data collection appli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Pedestrian Safety Analysis in Mixed Traffic Conditions Using Video Dat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Safety evaluation of right-turn smart channels using automated traffic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Use of Computer Vision to Identify Pedestrians' Nonconforming Behavior...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Feasibility of Computer Vision-Based Safety Evaluations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Automated Collection of Pedestrian Data through Computer Vision Techni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Methodologies for Aggregating Indicators of Traffic Conflict
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Mining Microscopic Data of Vehicle Conflicts and Collisions to Investi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. Automated Detection of Spatial Traffic Violations through use of Video...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Estimation of Frequency and Length of Pedestrian Stride in Urban Envir...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub