Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Assessing Use of Pedestrian Crash Data to Identify Unsafe Transit Service Segments for Safety Improvements

Abstract

This paper assesses the use of pedestrian crash data to explain the role of transit service and ridership in pedestrian crashes in urban areas. The values for measures that may be used to identify segments with transit service where it is potentially unsafe for users to walk were computed to identify the need for safety improvements. Descriptive analysis was conducted by comparing measures such as the numbers of pedestrian crashes, pedestrian crashes per mile, pedestrian crashes per mile per 10 transit stops, pedestrian crashes per mile per 1,000 transit riders (boarding and alighting), and pedestrian crashes per million vehicle miles traveled (MVMT), using data for Charlotte, North Carolina. Thirty study segments with transit service and 30 segments without transit service were considered to compare and examine the relationship. These segments were selected such that the land uses and on-network characteristics were similar and comparable. The computed ratios of the mean values of the numbers of pedestrian crashes, pedestrian crashes per mile, and pedestrian crashes per MVMT on segments with and without transit service were 4.82, 4.92, and 2.70, respectively. Statistical analysis was also conducted to test if the values of the selected measures were significantly higher on segments with transit service than on segments without transit service. Results from both descriptive and statistical analyses support the general belief that pedestrian crash rates are high on transit corridors and that a significant number of these pedestrian crashes involve transit system riders. The values for measures based on pedestrian crash data are thus computed, compared, and combined for segments with transit service to identify segments potentially unsafe for transit system users.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Zone Guide for Pedestrian Safety Shows How to Make Systematic Improvements. Report HS-042 731. Traffic Tech, Issue 181, NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
2. Schneider R. J., Khattak A. J., and Zegeer C. V. Method of Improving Pedestrian Safety Proactively with Geographic Information Systems: Example from a College Campus. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1773, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 97–107.
3. Pulugurtha S. S., and Nambisan S. S. Methodology to Identify High Pedestrian Crash Locations: Illustration Using Las Vegas Metro Area. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
4. Pulugurtha S. S., and Nambisan S. S. Pedestrian Safety Engineering and Intelligent Transportation System-Based Countermeasures Program for Reducing Pedestrian Fatalities, Injuries, Conflicts, and Other Surrogate Measures. Phase 1 technical report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Aug. 2002.
5. Ziari H., and Khabiri M. M. Applied GIS Software for Improving Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety. Transport: Journal of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University and Lithuanian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2005, pp. 160–164.
6. Pulugurtha S. S., Krishnakumar V. K., and Nambisan S. S. 2007. New Methods to Identify and Rank High Pedestrian Crash Zones: An Illustration. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 800–811.
7. Moudon A. W., and Hess P. M. Pedestrian Safety and Transit Corridors. Final report. Report WA-RD 556.1. Washington State Transportation Center, Olympia, 2003.
8. Hess P. M., Moudon A. V., and Matlick H. J. M. Pedestrian Safety and Transit Corridors. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2004, pp. 73–92.
9. Moudon A. V., Lin L., Hurvitz P., and Reeves P. Risk of Pedestrian Collision Occurrence: Case Control Study of Collision Locations on State Routes in King County and Seattle, Washington. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 25–38.
10. Pulugurtha S. S., and Vanapalli V. K. Hazardous Bus Stops Identification: An Illustration Using GIS. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2008, pp. 65–83.
11. Nabors D., Schneider R., Leven D., Lieberman K., and Mitchell C. Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies. Final report FHWA-SA-07-017. Office of Safety, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
12. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University. Evaluation of the Iowa DOT's Safety Improvement Candidate List Process. Report CTRE Project 00-74. Iowa State Department of Transportation, Ames, 2002.
13. High Accident Location Report Methodology. Office of Highway Safety, Idaho Transportation Department, Boise, 2002.
14. Pulugurtha S. S., and Repaka S. R. Assessment of Models to Measure Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 39–48.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Srinivas Subrahmanyam Pulugurtha
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001.
Eshwar N. Penkey
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 36

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Toolkit for the Assessment of Safety at Bus Stops
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Exploring road safety of pedestrians in proximity to public transit ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. City-oriented and inclusive bicycle-vehicle crash frequency modeling t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Safety of walking trips accessing to public transportation: A Bayesian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Estimating Pedestrian Crossing Volumes and Crashes at Midblock Locatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Pedestrian accessibility and safety around bus stops in Delhi
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub