Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2010

Evaluation of Wireless Devices for Monitoring Fracture-Critical Steel Bridges

Abstract

Highway bridges are vital links in the U.S. transportation network, providing the public with routes for daily commutes and businesses with the infrastructure needed to supply goods and services. Identifying possible safety problems in the approximately 600,000 bridges across the country generally is accomplished through labor-intensive visual inspections. The National Bridge Inspection Program requires that bridges be inspected at least once every 2 years. Pending legislation spurred by the collapse of the I-35W steel truss bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, would increase the inspections for fracture-critical bridges to once a year and likely strain department of transportation resources that are already stretched to the limit. This paper outlines ongoing research sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology that seeks to improve inspection practices by providing the technology and methodology for real-time monitoring of steel bridges. The first generation of two wireless systems (one based on IEEE 802.11 and another on IEEE 802.15.4) from National Instruments has been evaluated in field conditions. This paper presents results of a study to characterize wireless communication in steel box girders and I-girders. In addition, enhancements to be made in the second generation are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2004 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance. 2006. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2004cpr/.
2. Lynch J., Sundararajan A., Law K., Kiremidjian A., and Carryer E. Embedding Damage Detection Algorithms in a Wireless Sensing Unit for Operation Power Efficiency. Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 13, 2004, pp. 800–810.
3. Robbins W., and Marusic I. Wind-Generated Electricity Using Flexible Piezoelectrics. Feb. 18, 2006. http://www.ece.umn.edu/groups/power/workshop_feb06/Piezo%20Wind%20Gen%20Orlando%20Feb2006.pdf.
4. Sanzonov E. Energy Harvesting as Enabling Factor for Bridge Monitoring. 2008. http://www.intelligent-systems.info/energy_harvesting/bridge_experiments/bridge_energy_harvesting.htm. Accessed Nov. 10, 2009.
5. Beeby S., Torah R. N., Tudor M. J., Glynne-Jones P., O'Donnel T., Saha C. R., and Roy S. A Micro Electromagnetic Generator for Vibration Energy Harvesting. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 17, 2007, pp. 1257–1265.
6. Lynch J., and Loh K. A Summary Review of Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring. The Shock and Vibration Digest, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 91–128.
7. Lynch J., Wang Y., Loh K., Yi J.-H., and Yun C.-B. Performance Monitoring of the Geumdang Bridge Using a Dense Network of High-Resolution Wireless Sensors. Smart Materials and Structures, 2006, pp. 1561–1575.
8. Paek J., Chintalapudi K., Govindan R., Caffrey J., and Masri S. A Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring: Performance and Experience. Second IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, 2005, pp. 1–10.
9. Whelan M., and Janoyan K. Design of a Robust, High-Rate Wireless Sensor Network for Static and Dynamic Structural Monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2009, pp. 849–863.
10. National Instruments. 2009. http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/205694. Accessed Nov. 24, 2009.
11. Fasl J., Helwig T., Wood S., Potter D., Samaras V., and Frank K. Development of Rapid, Reliable, and Economical Methods for Inspection and Monitoring Fracture-Critical Steel Bridges. Presented at World Steel Bridge Symposium, San Antonio, Tex., Nov. 18–20, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2010
Issue published: January 2010

Rights and permissions

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeremiah Fasl
Phil M. Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Building 177, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, TX 78758.
Todd Helwig
C1700, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX 78712.
Sharon L. Wood
C1700, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX 78712.
Vasilis Samaras
Phil M. Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Building 177, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, TX 78758.
David Potter
National Instruments Corporation, 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Building C, Austin, TX 78759-3504.
Richard Lindenberg
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., 330 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062.
Karl Frank
C1748, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX 78712.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Bayesian model updating and prognosis of fatigue crack growth
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub