Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Application of Threshold Concepts to Improve a Design-Focused Course in Transportation Engineering

Abstract

Design is an integral part of engineering courses. To address its associated problems, however, is a challenging task in instruction because of design's open-endedness and complexity. In this study, two theoretical models were implemented in an introductory transportation engineering course to address the challenges associated with design of a highway. First, the theoretical framework proposed by the threshold concepts model was used to identify a candidate concept for the instructional redesign process. Two major characteristics of threshold concepts, integrativity and transformativity, were used to identify horizontal alignment as a candidate concept for the highway design process. Second, concept mapping was done to create operational measures of the integrativity of complex concepts, such as horizontal alignment. These maps and measures led to several changes to the structure of lecture materials and project tasks. Finally, questions for reflective assessment were administered to students after each redesigned instructional task and at the end of the course to find evidence of the potential transformativity of the proposed instructional changes. Implementation of the above-mentioned theoretical framework allowed the instructor who participated in the study to successfully streamline the instructional process and benefitted student perceptions and attitudes about learning highway design.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jonassen D. H. Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, Calif., 2004.
2. Jonassen D. H., Beissner K., and Yacci M. Structural Knowledge: Techniques for Representing, Conveying, and Acquiring Structural Knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1993.
3. Sun C., Recker W., Ritchie S., Gallagher B., Shen E., and Thai J. Oak-Tree: One-of-a-Kind Traffic Research and Education Experiment. In Transportation Research Record 1603, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 106–111.
4. Bham G. H., Cernusca D., Luna R., and Manepalli U. R. R. Longitudinal Evaluation of a GIS Laboratory in a Transportation Engineering Course. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice (forthcoming).
5. Meyer J., and Land R. Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practicing within the Disciplines. Occasional Report 4. University of Edinburgh, Coventry and Durham, United Kingdom, 2003.
6. Garber N. J., and Hoel L. A. Traffic and Highway Engineering, 4th ed. Cengage Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2009.
7. Meyer J., and Land R. Threshold Concept and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning. Higher Education, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2005, pp. 373–388.
8. Preece P. F. Mapping Cognitive Structure: A Comparison of Methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 68, No. 1, 1976, pp. 1–8.
9. Rumelhart D. E., and Ortony A. The Representation of Knowledge in Memory. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge (Anderson R. C., Spiro R. J., and Montague W. E., eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1977, pp. 99–135.
10. Taylor C. Threshold Concepts in Biology. In Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding (Meyer J., and Land R., eds.), Routledge, New York, 2006, pp. 87–99.
11. Khalife J. T. Threshold for the Introduction of Programming: Providing Learners with a Simple Computer Model. Proc. 18th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, University of Sussex, United Kingdom, 2006, pp. 244–254.
12. Bulmer M., O'Brien M., and Price S. Troublesome Concepts in Statistics: A Student Perspective on What They Are and How to Learn Them. Proc. Assessment in Science Teaching and Learning Symposium, University of Sydney, Australia, pp. 9–15. http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2007/2009.pdf. Accessed March 5, 2010.
13. Bernhard J., and Carsternsen A. K. Modeling and Learning a Complex Concept—An Exploration in Light of Some Examples from Electric Circuit Theory. Presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Malmö, Sweden, 2007.
14. Cousin G. An Introduction to Threshold Concepts. Planet, Vol. 17, 2006, pp. 4–5.
15. Rowbottom D. P. Demystifying Threshold Concepts. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2007, pp. 263–270.
16. Reimann N., and Jackson I. Threshold Concepts in Economics. In Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding (Meyer J., and Land R., eds.), Routledge, New York, 2006, pp. 115–133.
17. Bartlett F. C. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology: Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 1932.
18. Grotzer T. A. Expanding Our Vision for Educational Technology: Procedural, Conceptual, and Structural Knowledge. Educational Technology, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2002, pp. 52–59.
19. Gruber T. R. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 43, 1993, pp. 907–928.
20. Chi M. T. H. Conceptual Change Within and Across Ontologies. Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 15, 1992, pp. 129–186.
21. Jacobson M. J., Kapur M., So H.-J., and Lee J. The Ontologies of Complexity and Learning About Complex Systems. Instructional Science, 2010. http://www.springerlink.com/content/d0611685q48n2415/fulltext.html. Accessed April 10, 2010.
22. Bogdan R. C., and Biklen S. K. Qualitative Research for Education, 3rd ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass., 1998.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dan Cernusca
Division of Global Learning, 207 Norwood Hall, 320 West 12th Street, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409.
Ghulam H. Bham
Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, 135 Butler Carlton Hall, 1401 North Pine Street, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 20

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Identifying threshold concepts: case study of an open catchment hydrau...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub