Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Low-Volume Roads and Road Safety Audits: Lessons Learned

Abstract

Low-volume roads, paved and unpaved, pose a safety concern for various road users. Changes in roadway ownership, diverse user groups, traffic patterns, and new developments often create conditions unanticipated in the original roadway design. This problem is particularly true for low-volume roads, many of which were not formally designed. Low-volume roads represent a large portion of the national roadway network and crash problem. It is difficult to quantify the crash problem on low-volume roads, but 40% of fatal crashes in the United States occur on local roads, many of which are rural and low volume. Rural roads also have much higher crash rates than urban roads. Although the magnitude of crashes on this network is relatively large, crashes are fairly disbursed because of the vast mileage. Thus, it is difficult to identify crash clusters and trends with traditional engineering studies. Also, crash data may not be maintained, and allocation may not be referenced for these roadways. Road safety audits (RSAs) are one way to overcome several shortcomings of traditional engineering studies that analyze low-volume roads. RSAs are an effective tool for proactively improving the safety performance of a road. This paper discusses applying RSAs to identify and address safety issues on low-volume paved roads by considering their unique characteristics. In addition, unpaved roads are discussed with respect to the potential for RSAs to address safety concerns at these locations. The paper summarizes common safety issues identified on low-volume roads through 10 years of RSA experience. Potential low-cost safety strategies are also identified.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Contrasting Rural and Urban Fatal Crashes 1994–2003. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2. NHTSA. FARS Query System. http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/. Accessed October 2010.
3. Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT ≤ 400), 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
4. Stephens L. B. Barrier Guide for Low-Volume and Low-Speed Roads. Report FHWA-CFL/TD-05–009. FHWA, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Lakewood, Colo., 2005.
5. Russell E. R., and Smith B. L. Kansas Low-Volume Roads Handbook: Just Another Manual? Presented at Sixth International Conference on Low-Volume Roads, Minneapolis, Minn., June 25–29, 1995.
6. Russell E. R. National Handbook of Traffic Control Practice for Low-Volume Rural Roads and Small Cities: Volume I. Low-Volume Roads. Mark Blackwell Transportation Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, 2003.
7. FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines. Report FHWA-SA-06-06. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
8. Hallmark S. L., Veneziano D., McDonald T., Graham J., Bauer K. M., Patel R., and Council F. M. Safety Impacts of Pavement Edge Drop-Offs. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, D.C., 2006.
9. McGee H. W., and Hanscom F. R. Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety. FHWA-SA-07-002. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
10. Torbic D. J., Harwood D. W., Gilmore D. K., Pfefer R., Neuman T. R., Slack K. L., and Hardy K. K. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan: Volume 7. A Guide for Reducing Collisions at Horizontal Curves. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
11. Roadside Design Guide, 3rd ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2002.
12. Hallmark S., Hawkins N., Smadi O., Kinsenbaw C., Orellana M., Hans Z., and Isebrands H. Strategies to Address Nighttime Crashes at Rural, Unsignalized Intersections. CTRE Project 05–220. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Ames, Iowa, 2008.
13. Neuman T. R., Pfefer R., Slack K. L., Hardy K. K., Harwood D. W., Potts I. B., Torbic D. J., and Kohlman Rabbani E. R. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan: Volume 5. A Guide for Addressing Unsignalized Intersection Collisions. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
14. Campbell B. J., Zegeer C., Huang H., and Cynecki M. A Review of Pedestrian Safety Research in the United States and Abroad. Report FHWA-RD-03–042. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill; FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
15. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe/. Accessed July 2010.
16. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Bicycle Countermeasure Selection System. http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/bikesafe/. Accessed July 2010.
17. Animal Vehicle Crashes. Tech Transfer Newsletter, Winter 2001. http://www.techtransfer.berkeley.edu/newsletter/archive.php. Accessed July 2010.
18. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Critter Crossings, 2000. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/wildlifecrossings. Accessed July 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Frank Gross
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., 333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1450, Raleigh, NC 27601.
Kimberly Eccles
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., 333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1450, Raleigh, NC 27601.
Daniel Nabors
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., 8300 Boone Boulevard, Suite 700, Vienna, VA 22182.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 109

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Evaluating Safety Benefits of Vehicle-to-Everything Sensor Sharing on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Empirical Bayes application on low-volume roads: Oregon case study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Applying a random parameters Negative Binomial Lindley model to examin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Risk Factors Associated with Crash Severity on Low-Volume Rural Roads ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Development of Low-Cost Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Safety Performance Functions for Low-Volume Roads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub