Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Identifying Promising Highway Segments for Safety Improvement through Speed Management

Abstract

Speed variation is closely related to the occurrence of traffic crashes. Thus, speed management strategies that reduce speed variation are expected to reduce crash frequency and not only improve safety but also prevent congestion due to crash occurrence. This study developed a modeling approach to identify promising road segments for safety improvement through speed management strategies and to illustrate how to select segments on the basis of model results. With the application of four statistical techniques (generalized additive model, negative binomial model, linear model, and empirical Bayes method) in three sequential steps to data collected on a 190-km section of expressway in South Korea, the study developed empirical models for selecting promising segments for safety improvement by the speed management strategies. This paper presents the five most-promising segments for implementing such strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Hauer E. Speed and Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2103, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 10–17.
2. Feng C. Synthesis of Studies on Speed and Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1779, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 86–92.
3. Abdel-Aty M., Pande A., Hsia L. Y., and Abdalla F. The Potential for Real-Time Traffic Crash Prediction. ITE Journal on the Web, 2005. www.ite.org/itejournal/webarticles.asp. Accessed July 10, 2010.
4. Kweon Y.-J., and Kockelman K. M. Safety Effects of Speed Limit Changes: Use of Panel Models, Including Speed, Use and Design Variables. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 148–158.
5. Garber N. J., and Ehrhart A. A. The Effect of Speed, Flow, and Geometric Characteristics on Crash Rates for Different Types of Virginia Highways. Publication VTRC 00–R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Virginia Department of Transportation, Charlottesville, 2000.
6. Zlatoper T. J. Determinants of Motor Vehicle Deaths in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 23, 1991, pp. 431–436.
7. Rodriguez R. J. Speed, Speed Dispersion, and the Highway Fatality Rate. Southern Economics Journal, Vol. 57, 1990, pp. 349–356.
8. Lave C. Speeding, Coordination and the 55 mph Limit. American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 5, 1985, pp. 1159–1164.
9. West L. B., and Dunn J. W. Accidents, Speed Deviations, and Speed Limits. Traffic Engineering, Vol. 41, 1971, pp. 52–55.
10. Cerillo J. A. 1968. Interstate System Accident Research Study II, Interim Report II. Public Roads, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1968, pp. 71–75.
11. Solomon D. Accidents on Main Rural Highways Related to Speed, Driver, and Vehicle. Technical Report. Bureau of Public Roads, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1964.
12. Speed Concepts: Informational Guide. FHWA, 2009.
13. Ha T. J., Kang J.-G., and Park J.-J. The Effects of Automated Speed Enforcement Systems on Traffic Flow Characteristics and Accidents in Korea. ITE Journal, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2003, pp. 28–31.
14. McMurtry T. M., Saito M., Riffkin M., and Heath S. Variable Speed Limit Signs: Effects on Speed and Speed Variation in Work Zones. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
15. Hirst W. M., Mountain L. J., and Maher M. J. Are Speed Enforcement Cameras More Effective Than Other Speed Management Measures? An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Speed and Accident Reductions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2005, pp. 731–741.
16. Hastie T. J., and Tibshirani R. J. Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1990.
17. Stone C. J. Additive Regression and Other Nonparametric Models. Annals of Statistics, Vol. 13, 1985, pp. 689–705.
18. Nelder J., and Wedderburn R. Generalized Linear Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 135, No. 3, 1972, pp. 370–384.
19. McCullagh P., and Nelder J. A. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.
20. Wahba G. Spline Models for Observational Data. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa., 1990.
21. Kweon Y.-J., and Lim I.-K. Appropriate Regression Model Types for Intersections in SafetyAnalyst. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
22. Liang K.-Y., and Zeger S. Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models. Biometrika, Vol. 73, 1986, pp. 13–22.
23. Pan W. Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations. Biometrics, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2001, pp. 120–125.
24. ITT Corporation. SafetyAnalyst User's Manual. DTFH61-03-C-00031. FHWA, 2009.
25. Highway Safety Manual, 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Young-Jun Kweon
Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, Virginia Department of Transportation, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903.
Cheol Oh
Department of Transportation Systems Engineering, Hanyang University, 1271 Sa 3-Dong, Sangnok-Gu, Ansan-Si, South Korea.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 20

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Spatial Analysis of the Contribution of Parking Service Facilities to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Characteristics and Potential Impacts of Rest Areas Proximate to Roadw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Estimating an Injury Crash Rate Prediction Model based on severity lev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A method to account for and estimate underreporting in crash frequency...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Do childhood experiences of neglect affect delinquency among child wel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub