Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Panel Data Analysis to Identify Covariates of Longevity and Patronage of Community Shuttles in New Jersey

Abstract

Shuttle services connecting passengers’ origins and destinations to transit stations and terminals can play a crucial role in enhancing system ridership. Partially because of federal funding through the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, such services have become popular in parts of the country. However, studies on the success of community shuttles have been rare. Almost all past studies were stated-preference studies, or case studies without statistical analysis of actual performance of shuttle services. To provide researchers and practitioners with crucial information on the factors potentially influencing the success of shuttle services, this study examined the longevity, level of service, and passenger volumes of the shuttle services introduced in New Jersey between 2002 and 2004. By using panel data analysis, the authors examined how local financial condition, station lot parking, parking cost, bus connections, and socioeconomic and land use characteristics of service areas influence the performance of shuttle services. The study used different types of data, including quarterly panel data on 31 shuttle services for a 7-year period, data from stated-preference surveys of six New Jersey Transit commuter rail lines, and municipal finance data. Results indicated that local financial condition was important for the longevity and level of service of shuttles. Evidence was also found that ease of access to station by alternative modes–whether by walking, local buses, or driving–reduced the attractiveness of shuttle services. Results of the study showed that the success of shuttle services may depend on factors far beyond stated preferences of potential users.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Kain J. F., and Liu Z. Secrets of Success: Assessing the Large Increases in Transit Ridership Achieved by Houston and San Diego Transit Providers. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, No. 7-8, 1999, pp. 601–624.
2. Kuby M., Barranda A., and Upchurch C. Factors Influencing Light-Rail Station Boardings in United States. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 223–247.
3. Lane C., DiCarlantonio M., and Usvyat L. Sketch Models to Forecast Commuter and Light Rail Ridership: Update to TCRP Report 16. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1986, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 198–210.
4. Taylor B. D., Fink C., and Brumbaugh S. Explaining Transit Ridership: What Has the Evidence Shown? Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Arlington, Va., Oct. 2009.
5. Voith R. The Long-Run Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail Transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1991, pp. 360–372.
6. Jia W. Metrorail Trends and Markets: Synopsis of Recent Ridership Growth. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2112, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 34–42.
7. Litman T. Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2004, pp. 37–58.
8. Pushkarev B. S., and Zupan J. M. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1977.
9. Yim Y. B., and Ceder A. Smart Feeder/Shuttle Bus Service: Consumer Research and Design. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2006, pp. 19–43.
10. Anspacher D., Khattak A. J., and Yim Y. The Demand for Rail Feeder Shuttles. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1–20.
11. Special Report 264: The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002.
12. Urbitran Associates, Inc. TCRP Report 116: Guidebook for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
13. Shannon E., and Brower K. You've Got Connections! Increasing Shuttle Bus Services to the MTA Railroads. Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA. Metropolitan Transit Authority, New York, 2002.
14. Hashemian H. Using GIS to Assess Demographic and Land Use Characteristics on Local Transit Services. Proc. 7th TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 236–246.
15. Dill J. Transit Use and Proximity to Rail: Results from Large Employment Sites in the San Francisco, California, Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1835, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 19–24.
16. O'Sullivan S., and Morrall J. Walking Distances to and from Light-Rail Transit Stations. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 19–26.
17. Givoni M., and Rietveld P. The Access Journey to the Railway Station and Its Role in Passengers’ Satisfaction with Rail Travel. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2007, pp. 357–365.
18. Merriman D. How Many Parking Spaces Does It Take to Create One Additional Transit Passenger? Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 28, No. 5, 1998, pp. 565–584.
19. Rodier C. J., Shaheen S. A., and Eaken A. M. Transit-Based Smart Parking in the San Francisco Bay Area, California: Assessment of User Demand and Behavioral Effects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 167–173.
20. Deka D. Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation. In Geography of Urban Transportation (Hanson S., and Giuliano G., eds.), Guildford Press, New York, 2004, pp. 332–355.
21. Division of Local Government Services, New Jersey Department of Community Affairs. 2004 Municipal Government Financial Information Summary, Trenton, New Jersey. http://www.nj.gov/dca/lgs/annual-rpt/04ar/menu_ar_2004.shtml. Accessed July 15, 2010.
22. Cameron A. C., and Trivedi P. K. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2005.
23. Hsiao C. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1986.
24. Deka D., Carnegie J., and Bilton P. What Does It Take For Shuttles To Succeed? Comparison of Stated Preferences and Reality of Shuttle Success in New Jersey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2144, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 102–110.
25. O'Sullivan A. Urban Economics. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass., 2000.
26. Hamilton B. W. The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Theoretical Comment. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, No. 3, 1976, pp. 647–650.
27. Pack J. R. Poverty and Urban Public Expenditures. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 11, 1998, pp. 1995–2019.
28. Studenmund A. H. Using Econometrics. Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, Mass. 2001.
29. Park H. M. Linear Regression Models for Panel Data Using SAS, Stata, LIMDEP, and SPSS. Working Paper. Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing, University Information Technology Services, Indiana University, Bloomingdale, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Devajyoti Deka
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.
Jon Carnegie
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.
Matthew Kabak
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Study design impacts on built environment and transit use research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub