Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Development and Validation of Speed Kidney, a New Traffic-Calming Device

Abstract

Traffic calming has been widely applied to urban areas in recent decades to moderate speed and traffic volume. Because most measures used are physical, a vehicle must modify its path and speed. A benefit of traffic calming is improved safety from speed reduction and traffic volume reduction. However, traffic calming has disadvantages, such as emergency response delays, traffic diversion, noise, vibrations, damage to vehicles, and discomfort. Common traffic-calming devices do not consider discomfort for drivers who achieve an appropriate calmed and safe speed. Consequently, it was necessary to develop a new traffic-calming device to moderate speed and to minimize the disadvantages of the previous devices. The Highway Engineering Research Group of the Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain, has invented, designed, and developed a new traffic-calming device, Speed Kidney. This paper provides the objectives of the Speed Kidney, a description of the new traffic-calming device, and its geometric design. The technological development of the device is described, as are the main results from preliminary tests, implementation on a campus street, and implementation on a controlled test track. Implementation criteria are also given. The Speed Kidney is a functional, feasible, sustainable, and safe solution for traffic calming.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sanz A. Calmar el Tráfico. Ministerio de Interior, Madrid, Spain, 2008.
2. Hallmark S., Knapp K., Thomas G., and Smith D. Temporary Speed Hump Impact Evaluation. Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, 2002.
3. Zech W. C., Walker D., Turochy R. E., Shoemaker A., and Hool J. N. Effectiveness of Speed Tables as a Traffic Calming Measure on a College Campus Street. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
4. Ewing R., and Hodder R. Best Development Practices. National Center for Smart Growth, University of Maryland, College Park, 1996.
5. García A., Torres A. J., Romero M. A., and Moreno A. T. Speed Profiles in Cross-Town Roads with Traffic Calming Measures. Presented at XVI Pan-American Conference of Traffic and Transportation Engineering and Logistics, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
6. Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants. Traffic Calming. http://www.trafficcalming.org/. Accessed July 20, 2010.
7. Barbosa H., Tight M., and May A. A Model of Speed Profiles for Traffic Calmed Roads. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2000, pp. 103–123.
8. Abate D., Dell'Acqua G., Lamberti R., and Coraggio G. Use of Traffic Calming Devices Along Major Roads thru Small Rural Communities in Italy. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
9. Torres A. J., García A., and Romero M. A. Efecto de la Tipología y la Separación de los Elementos Moderadores de la Velocidad sobre la Funcionalidad del Tráfico. Presented at IX Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte CIT 2010, Madrid, Spain, 2010.
10. Litman T. Traffic Calming Costs, Benefits and Equity Impacts. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 1999.
11. Ahn K., and Rakha H. A. Energy and Environmental Effects of Traffic Calming Measures. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
12. Ewing R. Traffic Calming State of Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.; FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Aug. 1999.
13. Knapp K. Traffic Calming Basics. Civil Engineering, Vol. 70, No. 1, Jan. 2000, pp. 46–49.
14. Canadian Guide to Neighborhood Traffic Calming. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Dec. 1998.
15. Traffic Calming Measures for Bus Routes. Technical Advice Note BP2/05. London Bus Priority Team, 2005.
16. Chang K., and Nolan M. An Evaluation of Speed Cushions on Neighborhood Streets: Balancing Emergency Vehicle Mobility with Traffic Calming Needs. 2006 ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit Compendium of Technical Papers, 2006, 8 p.
17. Batson S. Offset Speed Tables for Reduced Emergency Response Delay. Presented at ITE Technical Conference, Irvine, Calif., 2004.
18. Ortega V. J., and García A. Estudio de los factores relacionados con el vehículo que influyen en las visibilidades en redes viarias. Presented at the IV Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte, Valencia, Spain, 2000.
19. Romero M. A., and García A. Deceleration Lane Length Evaluation Based on a New Conflict Indicator. Presented at 4th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Valencia, Spain, 2010.
20. García A., and Romero M. A. Discussion of “Video-Capture-Based Approach to Extract Multiple Vehicular Trajectory Data for Traffic Modeling” by Heng Wei, Chuen Feng, Eric Meyer, and Joe Lee, ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 3, 2009, pp. 149–150.
21. García A., Romero M. A., and Moreno A. T. Desarrollo Tecnológico del Nuevo Moderador de Tráfico Speed Kidney. II Congreso Ibero-Americano de Seguridad Vial, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010.
22. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 4/04: Speed Cushions. Department for Transport, London, 1994.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alfredo García
Department of Transportation, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Ana Tsui Moreno
Department of Transportation, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Mario Alfonso Romero
Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 54

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Effect of Speed Calming Measures on Vehicular Speed for Rural Roads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Critical Analysis of Speed Hump and Speed Bump and Geometric Design of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Ageing Effect of Mechanical Joints on the Tyre/Joint Noises Monito...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub