Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Barriers to Teenage Mobility in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada: Attitudes, Concerns, and Policy Implications

Abstract

Conventional approaches to the management of transportation demand have had limited success in reducing automobile dependency. As a result, it has become increasingly important to understand the decision-making processes involved in determining travel behavior. To develop a more complete picture of travel behavior, research should consider diverse groups of travelers with various mobility abilities and needs. Research on urban form and travel behavior was extended beyond adult travel by examining teen travelers of 13 to 19 years of age in the greater Toronto area, Ontario, Canada. The issue was probed through the collection of quantitative and qualitative travel data from first-year students at the University of Toronto. The survey explored attitudes toward different modes in relation to the locational attributes of the respondent's hometown neighborhood. The narratives of the survey participants illustrate that the final travel choice is determined by the presence of supportive infrastructure that not only facilitates active mode choices but also shapes the perceptions and attitudes that teens form as a result of daily travel experiences. Findings underscore the importance of providing genuine choices that meet the needs of teens and other travelers with limited mobility.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. McDonald N. C. Exploratory Analysis of Children's Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 1–7.
2. Frank L. D., and McKay H. A. Time to Walk the Talk: Embracing the Built Environment to Promote Physical Mobility. British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 9, 2010, p. 615.
3. Panter J. R., and Jones A. P. Associations Between Physical Activity, Perceptions of the Neighbourhood Environment and Access to Facilities in an English City. Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 67, No. 11, 2010, pp. 1917–1923.
4. Anderson W. P., Kanaroglou P. S., and Miller E. J. Urban Form, Energy and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Evidence and Policy. Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1996, pp. 7–35.
5. Bhat C. R. A Model of Post-Home Arrival Activity Participation Behavior. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 32, 1988, pp. 387–400.
6. Damm D., and Lerman S. R. A Theory of Activity Scheduling Behaviour. Transportation and Planning, Vol. 13A, 1981, pp. 703–718.
7. McDonald N. C. Household Interactions and Children's School Travel: The Effect of Parental Work Patterns on Walking and Biking to School. Journal Transport Geography, Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 324–331.
8. Blumenberg E. En-Gendering Effective Planning: Spatial Mismatch, Low-Income Women, and Transportation Policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2004, pp. 269–281.
9. Kwan M. Gender, the Home–Work Link, and Space–Time Patterns of Nonemployment Activities. Economic Geography, Vol. 75, No. 4, 1999, pp. 370–394.
10. Cain A. Teenage Mobility in the United States: Issues and Opportunities for Promoting Public Transit. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1971, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 140–148.
11. Trowbridge M. J., and McDonald N. C. Urban Sprawl and Miles Driven Daily by Teenagers in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2008, pp. 202–206.
12. McDonald N. C. Critical Factors for Active Transportation to School Among Low-Income and Minority Students. Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2008, pp. 341–344.
13. Clifton K. J. Independent Mobility Among Teenagers: Exploration of Travel to After School Activities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 74–80.
14. Pooley C., Whyatt D., Walker M., Davies G., Coulton P., and Bamford W. Understanding the School Journey: Integrating Data on Travel and Environment. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2010, pp. 948–965.
15. McDonald N. C., Deakin E., and Aalborg A. E. Influence of the Social Environment on Children's School Travel. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 50, 2010, pp. S65–S68.
16. Larsen K., Gilliland J., Hess P., Tucker P., Irwin J., and He M. The Influence of the Physical Environment and Sociodemographic Characteristics on Children's Mode of Travel to and from School. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 99, No. 3, 2009, pp. 520–526.
17. Buliung R. N., Mitra R., and Faulkner G. Active School Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: An Exploration of Trends in Space and Time (1985–2006). Preventive Medicine, Vol. 48, 2009, pp. 507–512.
18. Ewing R., Schroeer W., and Greene W. School Location and Student Travel: Analysis of Factors Affecting Mode Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1895, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 55–63.
19. Fulton J. E., Shisler J. L., Yore M. M., and Caspersen C. J. Active Transportation to School: Findings from a National Survey. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, Vol. 76, 2005, pp. 352–357.
20. McMillan T. E. The Relative Influence of Urban Form on a Child's Travel Mode to School. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 44, 2007, pp. 69–79.
21. Tal G., and Handy S. L. Children's Biking for Nonschool Purposes: Getting to Soccer Games in Davis, California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2074, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 40–45.
22. Data Management Group. Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2006 Data Guide. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2008. http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/dataguide2006_v1.pdf. Accessed May 29, 2011.
23. García-España J. F., Ginsburg K. R., Durbin D. R., Elliott M. R., and Winston F. K. Primary Access to Vehicles Increases Risky Teen Driving Behaviors and Crashes: National Perspective. Pediatrics, Vol. 124, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1069–1075.
24. Saneinejad S., Kennedy C., and Roorda M. J. Modeling the Impact of Weather on Active Transportation. Canadian Transportation Research Forum Conference Proceedings, 2010, pp. 43–56.
25. Pucher J., Dill J., and Handy S. Infrastructure, Programs, and Policies to Increase Bicycling: An International Review. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 50, 2010, pp. S106–S125.
26. Akar G., and Clifton K. J. Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 165–172.
27. Chang H.-W., and Chang H.-L. Students' Perceptions of Difficulties in Cycling to School in Urban and Suburban Taiwan. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2060, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 123–130.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Reihane Marzoughi
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 Saint George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 85

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Engaging children in neighborhood planning for active travel infrastru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The Importance of Resident's Attitude Towards Service Quality in Trave...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Independent Mobility and Mode Choice for School Transportation: A Revi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Mobility surveys and sustainable policies in universities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub