Measuring Influence of Accessibility on Accident Severity with Structural Equation Modeling
Abstract
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a confirmatory, multivariate technique used to examine causal relationships between variables. Related to path analysis with a goal of selecting a model that best explains underlying relationships between variables, SEM is a useful tool for traffic safety research. This study examined the severity of crashes in terms of factors commonly attributed to accidents. These factors included human, vehicle, and roadway factors, along with accessibility measures that were considered relevant in previous studies. In this study, SEM was used to test an a priori model of crash severity. The analysis was carried out in a two-step process. The measurement model was first tested with a confirmatory factor analysis. After the validity of the measurement model was established, a four-latent-factor structural model was run. With an acceptable model fit, the magnitude of standardized path coefficients from the exogenous latent variables provided a means to assess the relative importance of the latent factors on crash severity. The results showed that the human latent factor was the most influential. Although a positive statistical relationship existed between roadway factors and crash severity, accessibility factors had the opposite effect on crash severity, that is, increased accessibility was shown to reduce crash severity.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Derrig R. A., Segui-Gomez M., Abtahi A., and Liu L. L. The Effect of Population Safety Belt Usage Rates on Motor Vehicle-Related Fatalities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 101–110.
2. Hijar M., Carrillo C., Flores M., Anaya R., and Lopez V. Risk Factors in Highway Traffic Accidents: A Case Control Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2000, pp. 703–709.
3. Norris F. H., Matthews B. A., and Riad J. K. Characterological, Situational, and Behavioral Risk Factors for Motor Vehicle Accidents: A Prospective Examination. Accident Analysis Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2000, pp. 505–515.
4. Valent F., Schiava F., Savonitto C., Gallo T., Brusaferro S., and Barbone F. Risk Factors for Fatal Road Traffic Accidents in Udine, Italy. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 71–84.
5. Massie D. L., Campbell K. L., and Williams A. F. Traffic Accident Involvement Rates by Driver Age and Gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1995, pp. 73–87.
6. Zhang J., Lindsay J., Clarke K., Robbins G., and Mao Y. Factors Affecting the Severity of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes Involving Elderly Drivers in Ontario. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2000, pp. 117–125.
7. Kim K., and Yamashita E. Motor Vehicle Crashes and Land Use: Empirical Analysis from Hawaii. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 73–79.
8. Levine N., Kim K. E., and Nitz L. H. Spatial Analysis of Honolulu Motor Vehicle Crashes: I. Spatial Patterns. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1995, pp. 663–674.
9. Levine N., Kim K. E., and Nitz L. H. Spatial Analysis of Honolulu Motor Vehicle Crashes: II. Zonal Generators. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1995, pp. 675–685.
10. Sathisan S. K., and Srinivasan N. Evaluation of Accessibility of Urban Transportation Networks. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 78–83.
11. Mondschein A., Brumbaugh S., and Taylor B. D. Congestion and Accessibility: What's the Relationship? Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
12. Pirie G. H. Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1978, pp. 299–312.
13. Kitamura R., Akiymama T., Yamamoto T., and Golob T. F. Accessibility in a Metropolis: Toward a Better Understanding of Land Use and Travel. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 64–75.
14. Levinson D. M. Accessibility and the Journey to Work. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1998, pp. 11–21.
15. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–114.
16. Nowakowska M. Logistic Models in Crash Severity Classification Based on Road Characteristics. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2148, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 16–26.
17. Memon A. Q. Road Accident Prediction Models and Influence of Traffic Flow, Road Length, Road Class, and Vehicle Class on Accidents. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
18. Sathisan S. K., and Srinivasan N. Evaluation of Accessibility of Urban Transportation Networks. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 78–83.
19. Kim K., Pant P., and Yamashita E. Accidents and Accessibility: Measuring the Influences of Demographic and Land Use Variables in Honolulu, Hawaii. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 9–17.
20. Golob T. F. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Choice Dynamics. Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1988.
21. Golob T. F. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine, 2001.
22. Lee J., Chung J., and Son B. Analysis of Traffic Accident Size for Korean Highway Using Structural Equation Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 1955–1963.
23. Foster J., Barkus E., and Yavorsky C. Understanding and Using Advanced Statistics. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2006.
24. Kim K., Pant P. R., and Yamashita E. I. Hit-and-Run Crashes: Using Rough Set Analysis with Logistic Regression to Capture Critical Attributes and Determinants. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 114–121.
25. Levine N., and Kim K. The Location of Motor Vehicle Crashes in Honolulu: A Methodology for Geocoding Intersections. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1998, pp. 557–576.
26. Kline R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. Guilford Press, New York, 2005.
27. Byrne B. M. Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York, 2010.
28. Arbuckle J. L. AMOS 18 User's Guide. Amos Development Corporation, Crawfordville, Fla., 2009.
29. Hatcher L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, 1st ed. SAS Publishing, Cary, N.C., 1994.
30. Anderson J. C., and Gerbing D. W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No. 3, 1988, pp. 411–423.
31. Dion P. A. Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling Results: A Reply to Martin and Cullen. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 83, 2008, pp. 365–368.
32. Mussone L., and Kim K. The Analysis of Motor Vehicle Crash Clusters Using the Vector Quantization Technique. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2010, pp. 162–175.
33. Kim K., Nitz L., Richardson J., and Li L. Personal and Behavioral Predictors of Automobile Crash and Injury Severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 469–481.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 153
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 36
- Analysis Framework to Assess Crash Severity for Large Trucks on Rural ...
- Texting and crossing: An extended theory of planned behaviour to model...
- Risk perception and travel behavior under short-lead evacuation: Post ...
- Stated Preference Analysis With Latent Variables for Higher Speed Rail
- Investigating speed-safety association: Considering the unobserved het...
- Analyzing the Safety Consequences of Pedestrian Spatial Violation at M...
- Structural equation modeling approach for investigating drivers’ risky...
- A comprehensive analysis of the relationships between the built enviro...
- Traffic congestion and its urban scale factors: Empirical evidence fro...
- Exploring the associations between winter maintenance operations, weat...
- Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structur...
- Severity analysis of red-light-running-related crashes using structura...
- Fusing crash data and surrogate safety measures for safety assessment:...
- Severity Analysis of Wildlife–Vehicle Crashes using Generalized Struct...
- Understanding the effects of vehicle platoons on crash type and severi...
- Overall performance impairment and crash risk due to distracted drivin...
- Analyzing Factors that Influence Expressway Traffic Crashes Based on A...
- Investigating in-vehicle distracting activities and crash risks for yo...
- Identifying High Crash Risk Highway Segments Using Jerk-Cluster Analys...
- Analyzing Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crashes at the Corridor Level: Stru...
- Influence of microscale environmental factors on perceived walk access...
- Factors That Influence Older Canadians’ Preferences for using Autonomo...
- Assessing the interrelations of traffic collisions' risk factors
- Are gates at rail grade crossings always safe? Examining motorist gate...
- Characteristics and mitigation strategies for cell phone use while dri...
- Analysis of Drivers’ Travel Behavior under Variable Message Sign Condi...
- The influence of bus service satisfaction on university students' mode...
- Assessment of the taxi service in Doha
- How big data serves for freight safety management at highway-rail grad...
- What are the differences in driver injury outcomes at highway-rail gra...
- Copula-Based Joint Model of Injury Severity and Vehicle Damage in Two-...
- Exploring the Nature and Severity of Heavy Truck Crashes in Abu Dhabi,...
- Modeling significant factors affecting commuters’ perspectives and pro...
- Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Measure Severity of Single-Vehi...
- Entropy and Accidents
- Analysis of drivers’ behavior under reduced visibility conditions usin...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
