Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Estimation of Traffic Conflict Risk for Merging Vehicles on Highway Merge Section

Abstract

This study proposed a methodology for estimating rear-end conflict risk of vehicles on freeway merge sections as a probabilistic measure. The methodology consisted of two major components. The first part estimated the merging probability of a vehicle, given its position on a merge lane. Detailed vehicle trajectory data from the Next Generation Simulation program were used to find the underlying probability density function of the merging decision. The second part derived the probabilistic risk of a merging vehicle conflicting with vehicles around it as a function of a surrogate safety measure, namely, modified time-to-collision. These two parts were combined, and an index was proposed to describe the conflict risk of each merging vehicle at each time step. With aggregation of the conflict risk over time and space, a risk map for describing the level of conflict risk could be created. A case study demonstrated the implementation of the proposed method for traffic conflict analysis in detail. The result of this study can be used to evaluate the safety level of merge sections and develop real-time traffic control strategies to reduce conflicts associated with merging traffic.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wang J. S., and Knipling R. R. Lane Change/Merge Crashes: Problem Size Assessment and Statistical Description. DOT HS 808 075. NHTSA, U.S. Dept. Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994.
2. Sen B., Smith J. D., and Najm W. G. Analysis of Lane Change Crashes. Technical report. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
3. Cirillo J. A. The Relationship of Accidents to Length of Speed-Change Lanes and Weaving Areas on Interstate Highways. In Highway Research Record 312, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1970, pp. 17–32.
4. Piotrowicz G., and Robinson J. Ramp Metering Status in North America: 1995 Update. DOT-T-95–17. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1995.
5. Cleavenger D. K., and Upchurch J. Effect of Freeway Ramp Metering on Accidents: The Arizona Experience. ITE Journal, Vol. 69, No. 8, 1999, p. 12.
6. Chin H. C., and Quek S. T. Measurement of Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1997, pp. 169–185.
7. Ismail K., Sayed T., Saunier N., and Lim C. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 44–54.
8. Antov D. State of the Art of the Use of Traffic Conflict Techniques and Other Pre-Accident Criteria in the Soviet Union, Especially in the Baltic Republics. Proc. 3rd Workshop, International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety, Cracow, Poland, November 1990.
9. Svensson Å., and Hydén C. Estimating the Severity of Safety Related Behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 379–385.
10. Parker M. R., and Zegeer C. V. Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operations-Observers Manual. FHWA-IP-88-027. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1989.
11. Sayed T., and Zein S. Traffic Conflict Standards for Intersections. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 22, 1999, pp. 309–323.
12. Songchitruksa P., and Tarko A. The Extreme Value Theory Approach to Safety Estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 811–822.
13. Oh C., Park S., and Ritchie S. G. A Method for Identifying Rear-End Collision Risks Using Inductive Loop Detectors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 295–301.
14. Saccomanno F. F., Cunto F. J. C., Guido G., and Vitale A. Comparing Safety at Signalized Intersections and Roundabouts Using Simulated Rear-End Conflicts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2078, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 90–95.
15. Songchitruksa P., and Tarko A. P. Practical Method for Estimating Frequency of Right-Angle Collisions at Traffic Signals. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1953, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 89–97.
16. Kita H. Effect of Merging Lane Length on the Merging Behavior at Expressway On-Ramps. In Transportation and Traffic Theory (Daganzo C. F., ed.), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1993, pp. 37–51.
17. Glennon J. C., Glauz W. D., Sharp M. C., and Thorson B. A. Critique of the Traffic-Conflict Technique. In Transportation Research Record 630, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 32–38.
18. Williams M. J. Validity of the Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1981, pp. 133–145.
19. Hayward J. C. Near-Miss Determination Through Use of a Scale of Danger. In Highway Research Record 384, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1972, pp. 24–34.
20. Ozbay K., Yang H., Bartin B., and Mudigonda S. Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 105–113.
21. Van der Horst R. Time-to-Collision As a Cue for Decision Making in Braking. In Vision in Vehicles III (Gale A. G., Brown I. D., Haslegrave C. M., and Taylor S. P., eds.), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1991, pp. 9–26.
22. Farber B. Designing a Distance Warning System from the User Point of View. APSIS Report. Institute für Arbeitspsychologie and Interdisziplinare Systemforchung, Glonn-Haslach, Germany, 1991.
23. Hogema J. H., and Janssen W. H. Effect of Intelligent Cruise Control on Driving Behavior. TM-1996-C-12. TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, Netherlands, 1996.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hong Yang
Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, 623 Bowser Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Kaan Ozbay
Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, 623 Bowser Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 190

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 35

  1. Traffic Performance of Successive Freeway Merge Segments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Countermeasures in Improving the Safet...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Risk-based merging decisions for autonomous vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Safety Analysis of Merging Vehicles Based on the Speed Difference betw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Safety evaluation method based on spatio-temporal proximity index for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Analysis of lane-changing conflict between cars and trucks at freeway ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. In-depth Analysis of Traffic Conflicts at Interchange Merging Areas Ba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. An In-Vehicle Warning Information Provision Strategy for V2V-Based Pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Research on Safety and Traffic Efficiency of Mixed Traffic Flows in th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Modeling conflict risk with real-time traffic data for road safety ass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. How impressions of other drivers affect one’s behavior when merging la...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. MAGIC Dataset: Multiple Conditions Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Group-Based...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Risk Identification and Conflict Prediction from Videos Based on TTC-M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Investigation of Merge Assist Policies to Improve Safety of Drone Traf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Optimal off-ramp terminal locating strategy based on traffic safety an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. A deep learning approach for real-time crash prediction using vehicle-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A review of naturalistic driving study surrogates and surrogate indica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Investigating the impact of a novel active gap metering signalization ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Safety analysis of freeway on-ramp merging with the presence of autono...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. TRAFFIC CONFLICT IDENTIFICATION OF E-BIKES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. A Novel Risk Indicator for Cut-In Situations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Real-time conflict-based Bayesian Tobit models for safety evaluation o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Using PET-Measured Traffic Conflicts to Analyze Safety Performance of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Factor Identification and Prediction for Teen Driver Crash Severity Us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Estimation of traffic conflicts using precise lateral position and wid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Study on Micro Influencing Factors of Traffic Conflicts in Subgrade St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Mining automatically extracted vehicle trajectory data for proactive s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Investigating the impact of dynamic merge control strategies on drivin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers’ crash risk ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Effects of crash warning systems on rear-end crash avoidance behavior ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Exploring the association of rear-end crash propensity and micro-scale...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Proactive vehicle emissions quantification from crash potential under ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Estimating potential conflicts between right-turn-on-red vehicles and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Development and Validation of a Vehicle Dynamics Integrated Traffic Si...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Classification modeling approach for vehicle dynamics model-integrated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub