Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Effects of Individual Differences on Driving Behavior and Traffic Flow Characteristics

Abstract

Studying driving behavior has been considered an important approach to identifying solutions to increase roadway level of service, reduce roadway traffic crashes, improve vehicle designs, and develop in-vehicle safety devices. The purpose of this research was to get insight into the effect of individual differences on driving behavior and traffic flow characteristics. A method of integrating driving simulators and traffic simulation was developed to investigate the effects of driving behavior on traffic flow. First, a cluster analysis was performed to classify drivers into three categories: aggressive, conservative, and moderate. Second, the driving behavior parameters of the three types of drivers were calibrated for traffic simulation models using the experimental data collected in a driving simulator. Then the effects of driving behavior on traffic flow were analyzed by traffic simulation techniques. The results show that the roadways with aggressive drivers have the highest flow rate but least traffic flow stability. Hence, to maintain roadway level of service and improve traffic safety, it is necessary to develop public training and education campaigns to reach out to aggressive drivers.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lownes N. E., and Machemehl R. B. Sensitivity of Simulated Capacity to Modification of VISSIM Driver Behavior Parameters. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1988, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 102–110.
2. Yannes C. D., and Lownes N. E. Identifying Capacity Interactions in Response to Simulated Driver Behavior. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
3. Pueboobpaphan R., and van Arem B. Driver and Vehicle Characteristics and Platoon and Traffic Flow Stability: Understanding the Relationship for Design and Assessment of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2189, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 88–97.
4. Gomes G., May A., and Horowitz R. Congested Freeway Micro-simulation Model Using VISSIM. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1876, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2004, pp. 71–81.
5. Brockfeld E., Kühne R. D., and Wagner P. Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Models of Traffic Flow. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1934, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 179–187.
6. Knipling R. R., Olsen E. C. B., and Prailey T. D. Individual Differences and the “High-Risk” Commercial Driver. Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program, Washington, D.C. www.national-academies.org/trb/bookstore. Accessed June 18, 2010.
7. Vladisavljevic I., Cooper J. M., Martin P. T., and Strayer D. L. Importance of Integrating Driving and Traffic Simulations: Case Study of Impact of Cell Phone Drivers on Traffic Flow. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
8. Greenwood M., and Woods H. M. The Incidence of Industrial Accidents upon Individuals with Special Reference to Multiple Accidents. Report 4. Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1919.
9. Motor Vehicle Driver Physical Condition and Evaluation Requirements. GB 18463-2001. China Standard Press, Beijing, 2001.
10. Liu D. H., and Li N. SPSS 15.0 Statistical Analysis. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2009.
11. Zhang Z., Rong J., and Ren F. Review of Car-Following Model Research. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, Vol. 21, No. 18, 2004, pp. 108–113.
12. Li D. H. Research on Drivers’ Difference and Simulation in Traffic Flow. PhD dissertation. Beijing University of Technology, 2008.
13. Rong J. Capacity of Basic Expressway Sections. PhD dissertation. Beijing University of Technology, 1999.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jian Rong
Key Lab of Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100124, China.
Kejun Mao
Key Lab of Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100124, China.
Jianming Ma
Texas Department of Transportation, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 106

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 21

  1. Freeway capacity modeling and analysis for traffic mixed with human-dr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Development of a Unity–VISSIM Co-Simulation Platform to Study Interact...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The relationship between aggressive driving and driver performance: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Personality and safety behavior: An analysis of worldwide research on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. B-GAP: Behavior-Rich Simulation and Navigation for Autonomous Driving
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. An Exploratory Study of Potential Freeway Level-of-Service Measures by...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The Influence of Individual Differences on Diverging Behavior at the W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. CMetric: A Driving Behavior Measure using Centrality Functions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A temporal analysis of driver-injury severities in crashes involving a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A context identification layer to the reasoning subsystem of context-a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. GraphRQI: Classifying Driver Behaviors Using Graph Spectrums
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Assessment of traffic performance measures and safety based on driver ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. An Improved Single-Lane Cellular Automaton Model considering Driver’s ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Grouped random parameters bivariate probit analysis of perceived and o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Spatial investigation of aging-involved crashes: A GIS-based case stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Study on the Individual Characteristics and Differences of Driving Beh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Crash risk evaluation of aggressive driving on motorways: Microscopic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The impact of high-risk drivers and benefits of limiting their driving...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. CO<inf>2</inf> vehicular emission statistical analysis with instantane...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Analysis of Car-following Behavior on Sag and Curve Sections at Interc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub