Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Evaluation of Lighted Pavement Marker Stop Bars at Intersections with Light Rail Lines

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of the use of lighted pavement markers parallel to an intersection stop bar for three treatment intersections in Houston, Texas. The line of pavement markers was active, with a red light displayed from each marker during the red interval of the traffic signal. Each lighted pavement marker contained multiple LEDs, which operated such that each marker displayed an alternating wigwag pattern. The intended impact of the pavement markers was to reduce red light running violations and crashes on the intersection approach to an arterial that had an at-grade light rail line within its median. A before-and-after study was conducted to determine changes in crashes, red light running violations, and right turn on red violations at the study sites (right turns on red are prohibited at all the study sites). The analysis results showed that the lighted pavement markers reduced red light running violations at all three treatment sites, with two of the three reductions being statistically significant. Right turn on red violations were also reduced, and the reduction was statistically significant at all three treatment sites. A fourth site was chosen as a comparison (nontreatment) site, and the before-and-after study showed no notable change in the number of red light running violations or right turn on red violations at this site.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. National Campaign to Stop Red Light Running. The Red Light Running Problem. http://www.stopredlightrunning.com/problem.htm. Accessed July 30, 2010.
2. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Communities Using Red Light and/or Speed Cameras. tp://www.iihs.org/research/topics/auto_enforce_cities.html. Accessed July 30, 2010.
3. Bonneson J., Zimmerman K., and Brewer M. Engineering Countermeasures to Reduce Red-Light-Running. Report 4027-2. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Aug. 2002.
4. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Dec. 2009. http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2009/pdf_index.htm. Accessed April 16, 2010.
5. Carson J. L., Tydlacka J., Gray L. S., and Voigt A. P. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 380: Applications of Illuminated, Active, In-Pavement Marker Systems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.
6. “Before and After” Data Results—Stop Line LED Lights Experimental Traffic Control Device Application. Summary report. Prepared for the City of Anaheim, Calif., by Kaku Associates, Inc., Santa Monica, Calif., June 2002.
7. Traffic Engineering Study Before and After Mid-Block Pedestrian Crosswalk on West Alabama Part 1. TEDSI Infrastructure Group, Houston, Tex., Jan. 2004.
8. Traffic Engineering Study Before and After Mid-Block Pedestrian Crosswalk on West Alabama Part 2, TEDSI Infrastructure Group, Houston, Tex., Oct. 2004.
9. Tydlacka J., Voigt A., and Langford W. C. III Evaluation of a Lighted Pavement Marker Stop Bar. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jonathan Tydlacka
Houston Office, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 701 North Post Oak Road, Suite 430, Houston, TX 77024.
Anthony P. Voigt
Houston Office, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 701 North Post Oak Road, Suite 430, Houston, TX 77024.
Walter C. Langford, III
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, 1900 Main Street, P.O. Box 61429, Houston, TX 77208-1429.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 27

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Innovative countermeasures for red light running prevention at signali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Light Rail Transit Urban Insertion and Safety: European Experience
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub