Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Investigation of Underlying Distributional Assumption in Nested Logit Model Using Copula-Based Simulation and Numerical Approximation

Abstract

This paper proposes a practical approach for drawing random samples that satisfy the underlying distributional assumptions in the nested logit model. This approach is a combined application of a series of statistical and numerical techniques including copula-based characterization of joint distributions, quasi-Monte Carlo integration, coordinate conversion, dichotomous approximation, and linear interpolation. With this approach, one may efficiently sample from and directly observe the distribution of common random components that result in correlation between random utilities in the nested logit model. Monte Carlo studies are conducted for two- and three-level nested logit models to evaluate the performance of random samples to recover model coefficients in nested logit models. Simulation experiments show that the relative differences are no more than 3% between mean values of estimators and their true values, indicating the proposed approach's high level of accuracy in reproducing random components in nested logit models.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
2. Gangrade S., Pendyala R. M., and McCullough R. G. Nested Logit Model of Commuters’ Activity Schedules. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 5, No. 2/3, 2002, pp. 19–36.
3. Bowman J. L., and Ben-Akiva M. E. Activity-Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1–28.
4. Dissanayake D., and Morikawa T. Household Travel Behavior in Developing Countries: Nested Logit Model of Vehicle Ownership, Mode Choice, and Trip Chaining. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 45–52.
5. Vovsha P., and Bekhor S. Link-Nested Logit Model of Route Choice: Overcoming Route Overlapping Problem. In Transportation Research Record 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 133–142.
6. Shankar V., Mannering F., and Barfield W. Statistical Analysis of Accident Severity on Rural Freeways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1996, pp. 391–401.
7. McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Economics (Zarembka P., ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1974.
8. Klein R. W., and Spady R. H. An Efficient Semiparametric Estimator for Binary Response Models. Econometrica, Vol. 61, No. 2, 1993, pp. 387–421.
9. Walker J. Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
10. Walker J. Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 86–98.
11. Bhat C. R. Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 837–855.
12. Ferdous N., Eluru N., Bhat C. R., and Meloni I. A Multivariate Ordered Response Model System for Adults’ Weekday Activity Episode Generation by Activity Purpose and Social Context. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 44, No. 8/9, 2010, pp. 922–943.
13. Muthen L. K., and Muthen B. How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2002, pp. 599–620.
14. Train K. E., and Wilson W. W. Monte Carlo Analysis of SP-off-RP Data. Journal of Choice Modeling, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2009, pp. 101–117.
15. Garrow L. A., Bodea T. D., and Lee M. Generation of Synthetic Datasets for Discrete Choice Analysis. Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2010, pp. 183–202.
16. Pinjari A. R., and Bhat C. R. A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Nested Extreme Value (MDCNEV) Model: Formulation and Application to Non-Worker Activity Time-Use and Timing Behavior on Weekdays. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2010, pp. 562–583.
17. Hensher D. A., and Greene W. H. The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice. Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2003, pp. 133–176.
18. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
19. Munizaga M. A., and Ortuzar J. de D. Nested Logit Modeling: Some Hard Facts. 27th European Transport Conference, Vol. P324, PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd., London, 1999, pp. 25–36.
20. Munizaga M. A., and Alvarez-Daziano R. Mixed Logit vs. Nested Logit and Probit Models. Presented at 5th Tri-Annual Invitational Choice Symposium Workshop. Pacific Grove, Calif., June 2001.
21. Munizaga M. A., and Alvarez-Daziano R. Evaluation of Mixed Logit as a Practical Modeling Alternative. Proc. European Transport Conference, Cambridge, England, 2002.
22. Waddell P., Bhat C. R., Eluru N., Wang L., and Pendyala R. M. Modeling Interdependence in Household Residence and Workplace Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 84–92.
23. Cardell N. S. Variance Components Structures for the Extreme Value and Logistic Distributions. Econometric Theory, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1997, pp. 185–213.
24. Wu F., Valdez E. A., and Sherris M. Simulating Exchangeable Multivariate Archimedean Copulas and Its Applications. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, Vol. 36. No. 5, 2006, pp. 1019–1034.
25. Bhat C. R., and Eluru N. A Copula-Based Approach to Accommodate Residential Self-Selection Effects in Travel Behavior Modeling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 43, No. 7, 2009, pp. 749–765.
26. Spissu E., Pinjari A., and Bhat C. R. A Copula-Based Joint Multinomial Discrete-Continuous Model of Vehicle Type Choice and Miles of Travel. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2009, pp. 403–422.
27. Trivedi P. K., and Zimmer D. M. Copula Modeling: An Introduction for Practitioners. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2007.
28. GAUSS 9.0. Aptech Systems, Inc., Black Diamond, Wash., 2008.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xin Ye
National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, 1112J Preinkert Field House, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Civil Engineering Department, California State Polytechnic University, 3801 West Temple Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 18

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Estimation of urban route travel time distribution using Markov chains...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Second-order control of complex systems with correlated synthetic data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Practical Method to Simulate Multiple Discrete-Continuous Generalized ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Variance-component-based nested logit specifications: Improved formula...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub