Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Problem of Transshipment in Travel Forecasting: Model of Tour Structures

Abstract

The concept of the transshipment of goods has not been widely incorporated into models for transportation planning. A model with transshipment should recognize that a whole shipment could be transported in two or more stages involving intermediate points (transshipment points) between the origin and the final destination. The database containing data from the Ontario, Canada, Commercial Vehicle Survey is one of the few databases that contains substantial transshipment information. The analysis of the Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey first focused on commodities and their origin–destination facilities and defined terminals and warehouses as possible transshipment locations. Analysis revealed that any commodity was likely to be transshipped through either a truck terminal or a warehouse. Eight tour structures could be ascertained from the database, with each structure differing in the order and number of transshipment points and previous customers. A choice model of those tour structures was built. Factors such as commodity type, origin–destination facility type, truck type, distance, and shipment size were significant, depending on the structure.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Miller E., Roorda M. J., and Carrasco J. A. A Tour-Based Model of Travel Mode Choice. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, 2003.
2. Hunt J. D. Tour-Based Microsimulation of Urban Commercial Vehicle Movements in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Case Example. In Conference Proceedings 40: Freight Demand Modeling: Tools for Public-Sector Decision Making, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 61–71.
3. Donnelly R. A Hybrid Microsimulation Model of Freight Flows. In City Logistics V (Taniguchi E., and Thompson R., eds.), Institute of City Logistics, Kyoto, Japan, 2007, pp. 235–246.
4. Boerkamps J. H. K., and van Binsbergen A. GoodTrip—A New Approach for Modeling and Evaluation of Urban Goods Distribution. Presented at Urban Transport Systems 2nd KFB-Research Conference, Lund, Sweden. 1999. http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ersa03/cdrom/papers/173.pdf.
5. Wisetjindawat W., Sano K., and Matsumoto S. Commodity Distribution Model Incorporating Spatial Interactions for Urban Freight Movement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1966, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 41–50.
6. Ben-Akiva M., de Jong G., and Baak J. Method Report: Logistics Model in the Norwegian Freight Model System. Significance, The Hague, Netherlands, 2008.
7. Horowitz A. Microsimulation of Commodity Flow in the Mississippi Valley Region. Innovations in Freight Demand Modeling and Data. SHRP 2 Symposium. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
8. Melendez W., and Horowitz A. The Transshipment Problem in Travel Forecasting: Preliminary Analysis of the Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey. National Center for Freight and Infrastructure Research and Education, Center for Urban Transportation Studies, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 2009.
9. Melendez W., and Horowitz A. The Transshipment Problem in Travel Forecasting: Tour Structures from the Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey. National Center for Freight and Infrastructure Research and Education, Center for Urban Transportation Studies, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William J. Melendez
Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 2205 Engineering Hall, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706.
Alan J. Horowitz
Center for Urban Transportation Studies, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, P.O. Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Estimation of Warehouse Throughput in Freight Transport Demand Model f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub