Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Bi-Level Optimization Model for Public Transportation Network Redesign Problem: Accounting for Equity Issues

Abstract

Spatial equity is an extremely important issue in both design of a new and redesign of an existing transit (and highway) network because it is concerned with the benefit distribution among transit (and highway) network users. This paper presents a bi-level optimization model—in which the spatial equity issue is explicitly considered for the first time—for solving the public transportation network redesign problem (PTNRP). The goal of the upper-level subprogram is to minimize total cost, including user cost, operator cost, and unsatisfied demand cost, for the studied bus transit network, subject to a variety of resource- and policy-related constraints. The lower-level subprogram is a user self-routing optimization problem in which all transit users try to find the transit route to minimize their own travel cost (or time) and number of transfers in the network. Then, a procedure for a genetic algorithm–based solution is developed to solve this PTNRP bi-level optimization model. Network experiments are conducted, and numerical results are described. Future research directions are also given.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bailey L. Public Transportation and Petroleum Savings in the U.S.: Reducing Dependence on Oil. ICF International, Fairfax, Va., and APTA, Washington, D.C., 2007, 35 pp.
2. Baaj M. H., and Mahmassani H. S. An AI-Based Approach for Transit Route System Planning and Design. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1991, pp. 187–210.
3. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 69: Bus Route and Schedule Planning Guidelines. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980.
4. Newell G. F. Some Issues Relating to the Optimal Design of Bus Routes. Transportation Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1979, pp. 20–35.
5. LeBlanc L. J. Transit System Network Design. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1988, pp. 383–390.
6. Chang S. K., and Schonfeld P. Multiple Period Optimization of Bus Transit Systems. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1991, pp. 453–478.
7. Chien S., and Schonfeld P. Optimization of Grid Transit System in Heterogeneous Urban Environments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1997, pp. 28–35.
8. Spasovic L. N., Boilé M. P., and Bladikas A. K. Bus Transit Service Coverage for Maximum Profit and Social Welfare. In Transportation Research Record 1451, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 12–22.
9. Spasovic L. N., and Schonfeld P. A Method for Optimizing Transit Service Coverage. In Transportation Research Record 1402, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 28–39.
10. Guan J. F., Yang H., and Wirasinghe S. C. Simultaneous Optimization of Transit Line Configuration and Passenger Line Assignment. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2006, pp. 885–902.
11. Lampkin W., and Saalmans P. D. The Design of Routes, Service Frequencies and Schedules for a Municipal Bus Undertaking: A Case Study. Operation Research Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1967, pp. 375–397.
12. Rea J. C. Designing Urban Transit Systems: An Approach to the Route-Technology Selection Problem. University of Washington, Seattle, 1971.
13. Silman L. A., Barzily Z., and Passy U. Planning the Route System for Urban Buses. Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 1, 1974, pp. 201–211.
14. Dubois D., Bell G., and Llibre M. A Set of Methods in Transportation Network Synthesis and Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 30, 1979, pp. 797–808.
15. Ceder A., and Wilson N. H. M. Bus Network Design. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1986, pp. 331–344.
16. Ceder A., and Israeli Y. User and Operator Perspectives in Transit Network Design. In Transportation Research Record 1623, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 3–7.
17. Van Nes R., Hamerslag R., and Immer B. H. The Design of Public Transport Networks. In Transportation Research Record 1202, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 74–83.
18. Shih M.-C., Mahmassani H. S., and Baaj M. H. Planning and Design Model for Transit Route Networks with Coordinated Operations. In Transportation Research Record 1623, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 16–23.
19. Lee Y. J., and Vuchic V. R. Transit Network Design with Variable Demand. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
20. Zhao F., and Zeng X. Optimization of User and Operator Cost for Large Scale Transit Networks. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 4, 2007, pp. 240–251.
21. Pattnaik S. B., Mohan S., and Tom V. M. Urban Bus Transit Network Design Using Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, 1998, pp. 368–375.
22. Chien S., Yang Z., and Hou E. A Genetic Algorithm Approach for Transit Route Planning and Design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 3, 2001, pp. 200–207.
23. Chakroborty P. Genetic Algorithms for Optimal Urban Transit Network Design. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 18, 2003, pp. 184–200.
24. Chakroborty P., and Dwivedi T. Optimal Route Network Design for Transit Systems using Genetic Algorithms. Engineering Optimization, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 83–100.
25. Bielli M., Caramia M., and Carotenuto P. Genetic Algorithms in Bus Network Optimization. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 19–34.
26. Fan W. Optimal Transit Route Network Design Problem: Algorithms, Implementations, and Numerical Results. PhD dissertation. University of Texas at Austin, 2004.
27. Fan W., and Machemehl R. B. Optimal Transit Route Network Design Problem with Variable Transit Demand: A Genetic Algorithm Approach. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 1, 2006, pp. 40–51.
28. Fan W., and Machemehl R. B. Using a Simulated Annealing Algorithm to Solve the Transit Route Network Design Problem. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2006, pp. 122–132.
29. Fan W., and Machemehl R. B. A Tabu Search Based Heuristic Method for the Transit Route Network Design Problem. Proc. 9th International Conference on Computer-Aided Scheduling of Public Transport, San Diego, Calif., Aug. 2004.
30. Fan W., Machemehl R. B., and Lownes N. E. Some Computational Insights on the Optimal Bus Transit Route Network Design Problem. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2008, pp. 61–76.
31. Meng Q., and Yang H. Benefit Distribution and Equity in Road Network Design. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2002, pp. 19–35.
32. Chen A., and Yang C. Stochastic Transportation Network Design Problem with Spatial Equity Constraint. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1882, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 97–104.
33. Fisk C. S. Game Theory and Transportation Systems Modeling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 18, No. 4–5, 1984, pp. 301–313.
34. Ahuja R. K., Magnanti T. L., and Orlin J. B. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993.
35. Yen J. Y. Finding the k-Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network. Management Science, Vol. 17, No. 11, July 1971, pp. 712–716.
36. Yin Y. Genetic-Algorithms-Based Approach for Bilevel Programming Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 2, 2000, pp. 115–120.
37. Goldberg D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1989.
38. Holland J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1975.
39. Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structure = Evolution Programs, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.
40. Lownes N. E., and Machemehl R. B. Commuter Rail Circulator Route Network Design and Its Implications for Transit Accessibility. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2042, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 90–97.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Wei (David) Fan
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Tyler, RBS 1006, 3900 University Boulevard, Tyler, TX 75799.
Randy B. Machemehl
Center for Transportation Research, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, C1761, ECJ 6.908, Austin, TX 78712.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 318

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 35

  1. Linkage Problem in Location Optimization of Dedicated Bus Lanes on a N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Reliability-based equitable transit frequency design
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Sustainability in the evaluation of bus rapid transportation projects ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A Simplified Framework for the Equity-Based Spatial Assessment of Alte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Multiobjective Approach to the Transit Network Design Problem with Var...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Novel bilevel formulations for waste management
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Transit route network redesign under Electrification: Model and applic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Joint optimisation of transfer location and capacity for a capacitated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Bi-level optimization of long-term highway work zone scheduling consid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Zone-based public transport route optimisation in an urban network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A route-planning method for long-distance commuter express bus service...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Determining Optimum Transit Signal Priority Implementation Locations o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Equity measures for the identification of public transport needs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Joint design of multimodal transit networks and shared autonomous mobi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Combining ITS and optimization in public transportation planning: stat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Metaheuristics for the transit route network design problem: a review ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Integrating social equity in highway maintenance and rehabilitation pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Modeling horizontal and vertical equity in the public transport design...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Joint Design of Multimodal Transit Networks and Shared Autonomous Mobi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Uncertainty Handling in Bilevel Optimization for Robust and Reliable S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Optimal Adjustment Schemes on the Long Through-Type Bus Lines consider...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Smart Urban Transit Systems: From Integrated Framework to Interdiscipl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Appro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Combinatorial optimization of bus lane infrastructure layout and bus o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Social welfare maximization by optimal toll design for congestion mana...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Quantifying the impacts of horizontal and vertical equity in transit r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Using GIS to assess the potential for centralised planning of bus netw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Modeling the Impact of Transit Fare Change on Passengers’ Accessibilit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Improving the connectivity of a bus system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Optimal congestion pricing toll design under multiclass transportation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Optimal congestion pricing toll design for revenue maximization: compr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literatur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. An Optimal Allocation Model of Public Transit Mode Proportion for the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Combined Decision Making of Congestion Pricing and Capacity Expansion:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Development of Location Method for Urban Public Transit Networks Based...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub