Development and Implementation of Conflict-Based Assessment of Pedestrian Safety to Evaluate Accessibility of Complex Intersections
Abstract
This paper describes the development and implementation of the conflict-based assessment of pedestrian safety (CAPS) methodology for the evaluation of pedestrian accessibility at complex intersections. Significant research has explored pedestrian access to modern roundabouts and other complex intersections, and a significant focus has been placed on accessibility for pedestrians who were blind. A majority of these studies relied on actual street crossings by study participants under the supervision of a trained orientation and mobility specialist. These crossing studies quantified risk from a measurement of intervention events, in which the orientation and mobility specialist had to physically stop the participant from crossing. Although such studies provide useful data on the crossing risk at a particular intersection, street crossings can be dangerous to the study participants and are time-consuming and expensive to conduct. The CAPS method emphasizes the use of conflict-based safety factors to quantify risk in a framework compatible with indicator studies. This method relates pedestrian crossing decisions to advanced measurements of vehicle dynamics to estimate lane-by-lane conflicts and identifies the grade of conflict on the basis of a five-criterion rating scale. The CAPS framework was applied to a study of crossings by blind pedestrians at a multilane roundabout. The resulting risk scores were calibrated from the actual orientation and mobility interventions observed during the study. The calibrated CAPS framework correctly matched all (high-risk) orientation and mobility intervention events and further identified other (lower-risk) pedestrian–vehicle conflicts. The CAPS framework provides a more efficient, objective, and consistent safety assessment of pedestrian crossings in a research context, without the need for pedestrians to step into the roadway.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. U.S. Department of Justice. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Home Page. United States Access Board, Washington, D.C., 1990. http://www.ada.gov. Accessed May 2010.
2. A Review of Pedestrian Safety Research in the United States and Abroad. Report FHWA-RD-03-042. Office of Safety Research and Development, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2004.
3. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Report FHWA-RD-00-067. Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2000.
4. Schroeder B. J., Rouphail N. M., and Hughes R. G. Working Concept of Accessibility: Performance Measures for the Usability of Crosswalks by Pedestrians with Vision Impairments. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 103–110.
5. Schroeder B. J., Rouphail N. M., and Emerson R. S. W. Exploratory Analysis of Crossing Difficulties for Blind and Sighed Pedestrians at Channelized Turn Lanes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 94–102.
6. U.S. Access Board. Revised Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. Washington, D.C., 2006. http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm. Accessed July 1, 2010.
7. Schroeder B., Hughes R., Rouphail N., Cunningham C., Salamati K., Long R., Guth D., Emerson R. W., Kim D., Barlow J., Bentzen B. L., Rodegerdts L., and Myers E. NCHRP Report 674: Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
8. Kaparias I., Bell M. G. H., Greensted J., Cheng S., Miri A., Taylor C., and Mount B. Development and Implementation of a Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflicts Analysis Method: Adaptation of a Vehicle–Vehicle Technique. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2198, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 75–82.
9. Fatality Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx. Accessed May 12, 2010.
10. Hydén C. The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Department of Technology and Society, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1987.
11. Swain J. Highway Safety: The Traffic Conflict Technique. U.K. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, London, 1987.
12. Parker M. R. Jr., and Zegeer C. V. Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operations—Observers Manual. Report FHMA-IP-88-027. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1989.
13. Guth D., Ashmead D., Long R., Wall R., and Ponchillia P. Blind and Sighted Pedestrians’ Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts. Human Factors, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2005, pp. 314–331.
14. Schroeder B. J. A Behavior-Based Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian–Vehicle Interaction at Crosswalk. PhD dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2008.
15. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
16. Mehmood A., and Easa S. M. Modeling Reaction Time in Car-Following Behaviour Based on Human Factors. International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2009, pp. 93–101.
17. Improved Right-Turn Slip-Lane Design. In Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System (PEDSAFE). Report FHWA-SA-04-003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004. http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe. Accessed Sept. 29, 2011.
18. Ashmead D., Guth D., Wall R., Long R., and Ponchillia P. Street Crossing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern Roundabout. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, 2005, pp. 812–821.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 136
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 27
- Before-after safety analysis of a shared space implementation
- Enhanced Crash Frequency Models Using Surrogate Safety Measures from C...
- Contrasting Perspectives on the Comfort and Safety of Pedestrians Inte...
- Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review o...
- Visually Impaired Pedestrian Safety
- Prediction of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at signalized intersections...
- Deriving Pedestrian Risk Index by Vehicle Type and Road Geometry at Mi...
- A novel skateboarder-related near-crash identification method with roa...
- Evaluating pedestrian vehicle interaction dynamics at un-signalized in...
- From univariate to bivariate extreme value models: Approaches to integ...
- Validating the bivariate extreme value modeling approach for road safe...
- Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A ...
- A model of pedestrian delay at unsignalized intersections in urban net...
- Examining pedestrian evasive actions as a potential indicator for traf...
- The effect of a roundabout corridor's design on selecting the optimal ...
- Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framew...
- Developing evasive action-based indicators for identifying pedestrian ...
- Comprehensive Safety Diagnosis Using Automated Video Analysis: Applica...
- Pedestrian Traffic Operations in Urban Networks
- Behavioural analysis of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles ...
- Assessing Safety Improvements to Pedestrian Crossings Using Automated ...
- Multicriteria Assessment of Crosswalk Location in Urban Roundabout Cor...
- Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions a...
- Blind and Sighted Pedestrians’ Road-Crossing Judgments at a Single-Lan...
- Event-Based Modeling of Driver Yielding Behavior to Pedestrians at Two...
- Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Traffic Conflicts in Street Designs wit...
- Application of Computer Vision to Diagnosis of Pedestrian Safety Issue...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
