Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Do Crashes and near Crashes in Simulator-Based Training Enhance Novice Drivers’ Visual Search for Latent Hazards?

Abstract

Young drivers (younger than 25 years of age) are overrepresented in crashes. Research suggests that a relevant cause is inadequate visual search for possible hazards that are hidden from view. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a low-cost, fixed-base simulator training program that would address this failure. It was hypothesized that elicited crashes in the simulator training would result in better scanning for latent hazards in scenarios that were similar to the training scenarios but situated in a different environment (near transfer), and, to a lesser degree, would result in better scanning in scenarios that had altogether different latent hazards than those contained in the training scenarios (far transfer). To test the hypotheses, 18 trained and 18 untrained young novice drivers were evaluated on an advanced driving simulator (different from the training simulator). The eye movements of both groups were measured. In near transfer scenarios, trained drivers fixated the hazardous region 84% of the time, compared with only 57% of untrained drivers. In far transfer scenarios, trained drivers fixated the hazardous region 71% of the time, compared with only 53% of untrained drivers. The differences between trained and untrained drivers in both the near transfer scenarios and the far transfer scenarios were significant, with a large effect size in the near transfer scenarios and a medium effect size in the far transfer scenarios [respectively: U = 63.00, p(2-tailed) > .01, r = -.53, and U = 88.00, p(2-tailed) > .05, r = -.39].

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Young Drivers: The Road to Safety. ITRD E130375. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, 2006.
2. Maycock G., Lockwood C. R., and Lester J. F. The Accident Liability of Car Drivers. Research Report 315. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1991.
3. McCartt A. T., Mayhew D. R., Braitman K. A., Ferguson S. A., and Simpson H. M. Effects of Age and Experience on Young Driver Crashes: Review of Recent Literature. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2009, pp. 209–219.
4. McCartt A. T., Shabanova V. I., and Leaf W. A. Driving Experience, Crashes and Traffic Citations of Teenage Beginning Drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2003, pp. 311–320.
5. Sagberg F. Month-by-Month Changes in Accident Risk Among Novice Drivers. Proc. 24th International Conference of Applied Psychology, San Francisco, Calif., 1998.
6. Vlakveld W. P. New Policy Proposals for Novice Drivers in the Netherlands. Proc. Behavioural Research in Road Safety: 14th Seminar, 2004, pp. 194–204.
7. McKnight A. J., and McKnight A. S. Young Novice Drivers: Careless or Clueless? Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2003, pp. 921–925.
8. Dingus T. A., Klauer S. G., Neale V. L., Petersen A., Lee S. E., Sudweek J., Perez M. A., Hankey J., Ramsey D., Gupta S., Bucher C., Doerzaph Z. R., Jermeland J., and Knipling R. R. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II—Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. DOT HS 810 593. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
9. Klauer S. G., Dingus T. A., Neale V. L., Sudweeks J. D., and Ramsey D. J. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. DOT HS 810 594. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
10. Crundall G., and Underwood D.E. Effects of Experience and Processing Demands on Visual Information Acquisition in Drivers. Ergonomics, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1998, pp. 448–458.
11. Falkmer T., and Gregersen N.-P. A Comparison of Eye Movement Behavior of Inexperienced and Experienced Drivers in Real Traffic Environments. Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 82, No. 8, 2005, pp. 732–739.
12. Mourant R. R., and Rockwell T. H. Strategies of Visual Search by Novice and Experienced Drivers. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 14, No., 1972, pp. 325–335.
13. Pradhan A. K., Hammel K. R., DeRamus R., Pollatsek A., Noyce D. A., and Fisher D. L. Using Eye Movements to Evaluate Effects of Driver Age on Risk Perception in a Driving Simulator. Human Factors, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2005, pp. 840–852.
14. Borowsky A., Oron-Gilad T., and Parmet Y. Age and Skill Differences in Classifying Hazardous Traffic Scenes. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 12, No., 2009, pp. 277–287.
15. Sagberg F., and Bjørnskau T. Hazard Perception and Driving Experience Among Novice Drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 407–414.
16. Chapman P., Underwood G., and Roberts K. Visual Search Patterns in Trained and Untrained Novice Drivers. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 5, No., 2002, pp. 157–167.
17. Fisher D. L., Laurie N. E., Glaser R., Connerney K., Pollatsek A., and Duffy S. A. Use of a Fixed-Base Driving Simulator to Evaluate the Effects of Experience and PC-Based Risk Awareness Training on Drivers’ Decisions. Human Factors, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2002, pp. 287–302.
18. Isler R. B., Starkey N. J., and Williamson A. R. Video-Based Road Commentary Training Improves Hazard Perception of Young Drivers in a Dual Task. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 445–452.
19. McKenna F., and Crick J. Developments in Hazard Perception: Prepared for Road Safety Division of DETR. TRL Report 297. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1997.
20. McKenna F. P., Horswill M. S., and Alexander J. L. Does Anticipation Training Affect Drivers’ Risk Taking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1–10.
21. Fisher D. L., Pollatsek A. P., and Pradhan A. Can Novice Drivers be Trained to Scan for Information that Will Reduce Their Likelihood of a Crash? Injury Prevention, Vol. 12, Supplement I, 2006, pp. i25–i29.
22. Pollatsek A., Narayanaan V., Pradhan A., and Fisher D. L. Using Eye Movements to Evaluate a PC-Based Risk Awareness and Perception Training Program on a Driving Simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 48, No., 2006, pp. 447–464.
23. Pradhan A. K., Pollatsek A., Knodler M., and Fisher D. L. Can Younger Drivers be Trained to Scan for Information that Will Reduce Their Risk in Roadway Traffic Scenarios that Are Hard to Identity as Hazardous? Ergonomics, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2009, pp. 657–673.
24. Ivancic K., and Hesketh B. Learning from Errors in a Driving Simulation: Effects on Driving Skill and Self-Confidence. Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 12, 2000, pp. 1966–1984.
25. Wang Y., Zhang W., and Salvendy G. Effects of a Simulation-Based Training Intervention on Novice Drivers’ Hazard Handling Performance. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2010, pp. 16–24.
26. Pollatsek A., Narayanaan V., Pradhan A., and Fisher D. L. Using Eye Movements to Evaluate a PC-Based Risk Awareness and Perception Training Program on a Driving Simulator. Human Factors, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2006, pp. 447–464.
27. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, 1988.
28. McGaugh J. L., McIntyre C. K., and Power A. E. Amygdala Modulation of Memory Consolidation: Interaction with Other Brain Systems. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Vol. 78, No. 3, 2002, pp. 539–552.
29. Brown A. L. Domain-Specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children. Cognitive Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1990, pp. 107–133.
30. Elvik R., Høye A., Vaa T., and Sørensen M. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures, 2nd ed. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, United Kingdom, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Willem Vlakveld
SWOV, Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB, Leidschendam, Netherlands.
Matthew R. E. Romoser
Arbella Insurance Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 160 Governors Drive, Amherst, MA 01033.
Hasmik Mehranian
Arbella Insurance Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 160 Governors Drive, Amherst, MA 01033.
Frank Diete
Schoenhauser Allee 52a, 10437 Berlin, Germany.
Alexander Pollatsek
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Tobin Hall, Room 418 Amherst, MA 01003.
Donald L. Fisher
Arbella Insurance Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 160 Governors Drive, Amherst, MA 01033.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 126

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 36

  1. Detection of Driver Cognitive Distraction Using Machine Learning Metho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Hazard Perception in Driving: A Systematic Literature Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Bears in our midst: Familiarity with Level 2 driving automation and at...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Experiences of young drivers and accompanying persons in Denmark: A qu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analysis of hazard perception characteristics based on driving behavio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Introducing accompanied driving in Denmark. Safety-related differences...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. From anticipation to behavioral intention: Insights into human process...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Hazard Warning & Turn Signal Indication Technologies and Acquisition i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Parents’ perceptions of driver education: A theoretically guided quali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Visual attention in realistic driving situations: Attentional capture ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Challenges for automated vehicle driver training: A thematic analysis ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Characteristics of a technology-based intervention for young drivers' ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Can young novice e-bike riders identify hazardous traffic situations? ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers’ Steering Behavior i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  15. A novel skateboarder-related near-crash identification method with roa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. PC-based hazard anticipation training for experienced cyclists: Design...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Young Driver Crashes with Cyclists: Identifying Training Opportunities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Evaluation of a Training Intervention to Improve Novice Drivers’ Hazar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The assessment of hazard awareness skills among light rail drivers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Improving drivers’ hazard perception in pedestrian-related situations ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The effects of repetitive presentation of specific hazards on eye move...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Facilitating hazard awareness skills among drivers regardless of age a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Virtual Reality Headset Training: Can It Be Used to Improve Young Driv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Latent Hazard Anticipation in Young Drivers: Review and Meta-Analysis ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Effect of driving experience and driving inactivity on young driver’s ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Expert drivers are better than non-expert drivers at rejecting unimpor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. An interview study exploring Tesla drivers' behavioural adaptation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Can Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder Use Virtual Reality Driving Si...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Simulation-Based Training for Novice Car Drivers and Motorcycle Riders...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Teen and Novice Drivers: The Road from Research to Practice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. International Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Hazard prediction discriminates between novice and experienced drivers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. A Review of Hazard Anticipation Training Programs for Young Drivers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Evaluation of a Risk Awareness Perception Training Program on Novice T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Multiple-object tracking while driving: the multiple-vehicle tracking ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. A comparative study of two desktop hazard perception tasks suitable fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub