Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Empirical Evaluation of Economic Order Quantity Model for Choice of Shipment Size in Freight Transport

Abstract

The choice of shipment size in freight transport depends on the logistical imperatives of shippers and the technical possibilities of carriers. The choice is closely related to the mode of transportation and therefore important for public policy. The theory of optimal shipment size and mode choice is robust. Numerous inventory-theoretical models of optimal shipment size are applied by shippers in operational contexts. However, none has been validated empirically over a large and heterogeneous population of shipments, and thus none are useful for modeling freight transportation demand, particularly because of the lack of adequate data. The simple economic order quantity (EOQ) model was assessed empirically on a national scale over a heterogeneous population of shipments. The French ECHO database, which observed commodity flow rates between shippers and receivers, was used to estimate the EOQ shipment size specification, and the validity of the EOQ model was confirmed. The study revealed the dominant role of the commodity flow rate between shipper and receiver and of commodity value density. The relationship between mode choice and shipment size is highlighted.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. de Jong G., Gunn H., and Walker W. National and International Freight Transport Models: An Overview and Ideas for Future Development. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2004, pp. 103–124.
2. Ortuzar J., and Willumsen L. G. Modelling Transport, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
3. Quinet E., and Vickerman R. W. Principles of Transport Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 2004.
4. Blauwens G., De Baere P., and Van de Voorde E. Transport Economics, 2nd ed. De Boeck, Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
5. Small K., and Verhoef E. The Economics of Urban Transportation, 2nd ed. Routledge, London, 1992.
6. Meyer J. R., Peck M. J., Stenason J., and Zwick C. The Economics of Competition in Transportation Industries Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1959.
7. Wilson W. W., and Wilson W. W., and Koo W. W. Modal Competition in Grain Transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1988, pp. 319–337.
8. McGinnis M. A., Corsi T. M., and Roberts M. J. A Multiple Criteria Analysis of Modal Choice. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1981, pp. 48–68.
9. Abshire R. D., and Premaux S. R. Motor Carriers and Shippers' Perceptions of the Carrier Choice Decision. Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1991, pp. 351–358.
10. Young W., Richardson A. J., Ogden K. W., and Rattray A. L. Road and Rail Freight Mode Choice: Application of an Elimination-by-Aspect Model. In Transportation Research Record 838, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 38–44.
11. Casavant K. L., Peñaranda W., Newkirk J., and Shanafelt J. Multimodal Transportation and Impacts of Policy: Grain Transportation Model. In Transportation Research Record 1383, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 31–40.
12. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
13. Catalani M. A Model of Shipper Behaviour Choice in a Domestic Freight Transport System. Proc., 9th World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul, South Korea, 2001.
14. Train K. E., and Wilson W. W. Spatial Demand Decisions in Pacific Northwest, Mode Choices and Market Areas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1963, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 9–14.
15. de Jong G., Gunn H., and Walker W. National and International Freight Transport Models: An Overview and Ideas for Future Developments. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2004, pp. 103–124.
16. Arunotayanun K., and Polak J. W. Taste Heterogeneity and Market Segmentation in Freight Shippers' Mode Choice Behaviour. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2011, pp. 138–148.
17. Miklius W. Estimating Freight Traffic of Competing Transportation Modes: An Application of the Linear Discriminant Function. Land Economics, Vol. 45, No. 2, 1969, pp. 267–273.
18. Friedlander A. F., and Spady R. H. A Derived Demand Function for Freight Transportation. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 62, No. 3, 1979, pp. 432–441.
19. Winston C. A Disaggregate Model of the Demand for Intercity Freight Transportation. Econometrica, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1981, pp. 981–1006.
20. Jiang F., Johnson P., and Calzada C. Freight Demand Characteristics and Mode Choice: An Analysis of the Results of Modeling with Disaggregate Revealed Preference Data. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1999, pp. 149–158.
21. Abdelwahab W. M., and Sargious M. A. Modeling the Demand for Freight Transport: New Approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1992, pp. 49–72.
22. Holguin-Veras J. Revealed Preference Analysis of Commercial Vehicle Choice Process. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 4, 2002, pp. 336–346.
23. Windisch E., de Jong G. C., van Nes R., and Hoogendoorn S. P. A Disaggregate Freight Transport Model of Transport Chain and Shipment Size Choice. Proc., European Transport Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 2010.
24. Harris F. W. How Many Parts to Make at Once. Factory, the Magazine of Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1913, pp. 135–152.
25. Wilson R. H. A Scientific Routine for Cost Control. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 13, 1934, pp. 116–128.
26. Baumol W. J., and Vinod H. D. An Inventory Theoretic Model of Freight Transport Demand. Management Science, Vol. 16, No. 7, 1970, pp. 413–421.
27. Langley C. J. The Inclusion of Transportation Costs in Inventory Models: Some Considerations. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1980, pp. 106–125.
28. Hall R. W. Dependence Between Shipment Size and Mode in Freight Transportation. Transportation Science, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1985, pp. 436–444.
29. McFadden D., Winston C., and Boersch-Supan A. Joint Estimation of Freight Transportation Decisions Under Nonrandom Sampling. In Analytical Studies in Transport Economics (Daugherty A. F., ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1985, pp. 138–157.
30. McCann P. A Proof of the Relationship Between Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length and the Structure of Distance-Transport Costs. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 8, 2004, pp. 671–693.
31. de Jong G., and Ben-Akiva M. A Micro-Simulation Model of Shipment Size and Transport Chain Choice. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2007, pp. 950–965.
32. Cunningham W. H. J. Freight Modal Choice and Competition in Transportation: A Critique and Categorisation of Analysis Techniques. Transportation Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1982, pp. 66–75.
33. Tyworth J. E. The Inventory Theoretic Approach in Transportation Selection Models: A Critical Review. Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1991, pp. 299–318.
34. Vernimmen B., and Witlox F. The Inventory-Theoretic Approach to Modal Choice in Freight Transport: Literature Review and Case Study. Brussels Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2003, pp. 5–28.
35. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Commodity Flow Survey. 2007. www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/index.html. Accessed Aug. 1, 2011.
36. Commodity Flow Survey 2001: Method Report. SIKA, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003.
37. Constable G. K., and Whybark C. The Interaction of Transportation and Inventory Decisions. Decision Sciences, Vol. 9, 1978, pp. 688–699.
38. Liedtke G., Friedrich H., Jochem P., Keultjes D., and Schroeder S. Estimation of the Benefits of Shippers from a Multimodal Transport Network. Proc., World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
39. Holguin-Veras J., Xu N., de Jong G., and Maurer H. An Experimental Economics Investigation of Shipper-Carrier Interactions in the Choice of Mode and Shipment Size in Freight Transport. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2009, pp. 1–24.
40. Chow J. Y. J., Yang C. H., and Regan A. C. State-of-the-Art of Freight Forecast Modelling: Lessons Learned and the Road Ahead. Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1011–1030.
41. Guilbault M. Enquête ECHO envoi—chargeurs—opérateurs de transport. Résultats de référence. INRETS, Paris, 2008.
42. Guilbault M., and Gouvernal E. Demand for Transport and Production Systems: Shipper Surveys in France in 1988 and 2004. Presented at European Transport Conference, Leeuwenhorst, Netherlands, 2008.
43. Combes F., and Leurent F. Representation of the Freight Transport System. Proc., European Transport Conference, Leeuwenhorst, Netherlands, 2007.
44. Tavasszy L., Ruijgrok K., and Davydenko I. Incorporating Logistics in Freight Transportation Models: State of the Art and Research Opportunities. Proc., World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
45. Combes F. The Choice of Shipment Size in Freight Transport. PhD thesis. Université Paris-Est, 2009.
46. Combes F., and Leurent F. M. Shipment Size and Freight Tariffs: Technical Constraints and Equilibrium Price Schedules. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

François Combes
Université Paris-Est, LVMT, UMR T9403 IFSTTAR ENPC UMLV, 6–8 av. Blaise Pascal, Cité Descartes, Champs-sur-Marne, F-77455 CEDEX 2, Marne-La-Vallée, France.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 128

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 23

  1. Freight Mode Choice with Public Data from the United States
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Shipment size and vehicle choice modeling for road freight transport: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Introducing CRISTAL: A model of collaborative, informed, strategic tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. EVALUATION OF THE INNOVATIVE VALUE PROPOSITION FOR THE RAIL FREIGHT TR...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The Influence of Logistics Decisions on Transport Decarbonization: Les...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Modeling Mode Choice in Freight Transport
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Exploring the impacts of an emission based truck charge in the Netherl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. SimMobility Freight: An agent-based urban freight simulator for evalua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Inventory Control System Using Distribution Requirement Planning (DRP)...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Empirical Shipment Size Model for Urban Freight and its Implications
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Joint model of freight mode choice and shipment size: A copula-based r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Supply chain elements in freight transport modelling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Investigating the potential for off-hour deliveries in the city of Rom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Copula-Based Joint Discrete–Continuous Model of Road Vehicle Type and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Behaviors of containerized freight shipments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Freight Demand Management and the Potential of Receiver-Led Consolidat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. An inventory-based simulation model for annual-to-daily temporal freig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. The New York City Off-hour Delivery Project: Lessons for City Logistic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Freight Generation and Freight Trip Generation Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Inventory Theory and Freight Transport Modelling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Multilevel modelling of commercial vehicle inter-arrival duration usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Estimation of an Inventory Theoretical Model of Mode Choice in Freight...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Joint Model of Freight Mode and Shipment Size Choice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub