Institutionalizing Sustainability at the Level of State Departments of Transportation: Quantitative assessment of Transportation Sustainability Plan Quality
Abstract
The quality of the sustainability plans of 11 state departments of transportation (DOTs) is systematically assessed with a content analysis methodology. Analysis reveals that state DOTs that have created a sustainability plan are also likely to have developed a policy framework aligned with the principles of sustainable transportation within their plan. The quality of a sustainability plan is driven by the strength of its policy framework, including plan visions, goals, policies, strategies, and performance measures. External drivers of plan quality include the presence of a prescriptive state sustainability mandate, external funding for plan development, and the involvement of a policy entrepreneur in plan development. Prescriptive mandates and external funding bolster the quality of the plan development process and the degree to which the plan is integrated with existing policies and practices of the DOT and other agencies. A policy entrepreneur's involvement in plan development strengthens the policy framework and helps unify plan content toward a consistent vision. In addition to conclusions relating to the development of transportation sustainability plans, this study illustrates the value of systematic and objective content analyses in assessing the quality of transportation planning documents.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1987.
2. Pearce D., Markandya A., and Barbier E. Blueprint for a Green Economy. EarthScan, London, 1989.
3. Litman T. A. Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A Recommended Research Program for Developing Sustainable Transportation Indicators and Data. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
4. Assessment and Decision Making for Sustainable Transport. European Conference of Ministers of Transportation, 2004.
5. Berke P., Godschalk D., and Kaiser E., with Rodriguez D. Urban Land Use Planning, 5th ed. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 2006.
6. Norton R. Using Content Analysis to Evaluate Local Master Plans and Zoning Codes. Land Use Policy, Vol. 25, 2008, pp. 432–454.
7. Singleton R., and Straits B. Approaches to Social Research, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1999.
8. Berke P., and Godschalk D. Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Plan Quality Studies. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2009, pp. 227–240.
9. Baer W. General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 63, No. 3, 1997, pp. 329–344.
10. Burby R., and May P., with Berke P., Dalton L., French S., and Kaiser E. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1997.
11. Berke P., and Manta-Conroy M. Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? An Evaluation of 30 Comprehensive Plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2000, pp. 21–33.
12. Edwards M., and Haines A. Evaluating Smart Growth: Implications for Small Communities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2007, pp. 49–64.
13. Berke P., Smith G., and Lyles W. State Hazard Mitigation Plan Evaluation and Model Practices. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2009.
14. Integration of Context Sensitive Solutions in the Transportation Planning Process. Office of Planning, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
15. Transportation Planning for Sustainability Guidebook. Office of Planning, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
16. Jones D.K., Evenson K., Rodriguez D., and Aytur S. Addressing Pedestrian Safety: A Content Analysis of Pedestrian Master Plans in North Carolina. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2010, pp. 57–65.
17. California Transportation Plan 2025. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2006.
18. Connecting Maine. Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, 2010.
19. Sustainability Plan. District of Columbia Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2010.
20. Sustainability Plan Volume 1. Setting the Context. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2008.
21. Sustainability Plan Volume 2. Sustainability Management Framework for ODOT's Internal Operations. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2010.
22. GreenLITES Project Design Certification Program. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 2008.
23. Draft GreenLITES Operations Certification Program. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 2009.
24. Draft GreenLITES for Sustainable Planning, Version 1.1. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, April 2010.
25. Illinois: Livable and Sustainable Transportation Rating System and Guide. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, 2010.
26. 2008 Sustainability Plan and Progress Report Update. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2008.
27. Sustainability Assessment Report. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 2008.
28. Smart Mobility 2010: A Call to Action for the New Decade. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2010.
29. GreenDOT Policy Directive. Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, 2010.
30. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Keystone Principles for Growth. Pennsylvania Interagency Land Use Team, Harrisburg, 2005.
31. Joumard R., and Gudmundsson H. Indicators of Environmental Sustainability in Transport. Institut national de recherche sur les transports et leur sécurité, Laboratoire Transports et Environnement, Bron cedex, France, 2010.
32. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265–294.
33. Putt A., and Springer F. Policy Research: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989.
34. Crow D. Policy Entrepreneurs, Issue Experts, and Water Rights Policy Change in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2010, pp. 299–315.
35. Baumgartner F., and Jones B. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press, Ill., 1993.
36. Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. Longman, New York, 1995.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 69
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 8
- Evaluating the integration of transportation planning in municipal off...
- Is Performance Measurement Improving Planning Practice? The Case of Lo...
- References
- Promotion of active transportation among state departments of transpor...
- Performance Comparison of Recycled Pavement Foundation Layers
- Building a Metaframework for Sustainable Transport Indicators...
- Methodology for Evaluating Quality of Travel Plans for New Development...
- Blueprint for Sustainability...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
