Sketch-Level Feasibility Analysis of Commuter Rail Service between Kannapolis and Charlotte, North Carolina
Abstract
This paper presents a sketch-level feasibility study for a proposed 28-mi commuter rail line connecting downtown Charlotte, North Carolina, to its fast-growing suburbs. Full-scale feasibility studies can be expensive, especially for cash-strapped local government agencies. A sketch analysis, such as the one presented here, is a low-cost means of determining whether a project merits further study. Ridership for the line is conservatively estimated at 2,010 in 2015 and 2,574 in 2035. Higher-speed service and a greater frequency of midday trains are shown to significantly increase these numbers. Cost-effectiveness depends largely on the actual cost per mile, but conservative estimates place the proposed route in the middle of the pack of new-start commuter rail lines: more cost-effective than the routes of Minneapolis, Minnesota, or Austin, Texas, but slightly less cost-effective than those of Albuquerque, New Mexico, or Nashville, Tennessee. In view of these results, a more comprehensive study appears to be merited.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. TCRP Report 16: Transit and Urban Form, Vols. 1 and 2. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.
2. Lane C., DiCarlantonio M., and Usvyat L. Sketch Models to Forecast Commuter and Light Rail Ridership: Update to TCRP Report 16. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1986, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 198–210.
3. Metrolina Regional Travel Demand Model. Charlotte Department of Transportation, Charlotte, N.C.
4. Harrison S. Charlotte Is Growing, but Not as Quickly. Charlotte Observer, March 19, 2009. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2009/03/19/607121/charlotte-is-growing-but-not-as.html. Accessed April 10, 2011.
5. Pittman K. V. People Still Flocking to Charlotte. Charlotte Observer, March 3, 2011. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/03/03/2106162/people-still-flocking-to-charlotte.html. Accessed April 10, 2011.
6. The Portland Exception: A Comparison of Sprawl, Smart Growth, and Rural Land Loss in 15 U.S. Cities. Northwest Environment Watch, Oct. 25, 2004. http://www.sightline.org/research/sprawl/the-portland-exception/portland04/PDX_sprawl_final.pdf. Accessed April 5, 2011.
7. Nonattainment Status for Each County by Year for North Carolina. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/anay_nc.html. Accessed April 5, 2011.
8. Centers, Corridors and Wedges. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Planning Commission. http://charmeck.org/city/charlotte/planning/AreaPlanning/CentersCorridorsWedges/Pages/Home.aspx. Accessed April 4, 2011.
9. Portillo E. CATS Will Scale Back Plans to Expand Light Rail: Transit System Also Will Look to Enlist Private Partner to Help Build Proposed Lake Norman Red Line. Charlotte Observer, Nov. 18, 2010. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/11/18/1846072/cats-will-scale-back-plans-to.html. Accessed April 4, 2011.
10. CK Rider. http://www.ckrider.com/MapsSchedules/SystemMap.aspx. Accessed April 5, 2011.
11. Cabarrus Economic Development Council. http://www.cabarrusedc.com/index.php?src=gendocs&ref=WORKFORCE&category=about_cc&submenu=about_cc. Accessed April 5, 2011.
12. Smith Pledges $50 Million to Jumpstart Monorail Project. Press release. Charlotte Motor Speedway, May 24, 2005. http://www.charlottemotorspeedway.com/media/news/549990.html. Accessed April 5, 2011.
13. Deines E. C. Concord Officials to Prepare Advocacy Plan for Light Rail. Independent Tribune, Feb. 2, 2008. LexisNexis Academic.
14. Tannenbaum F. Light-Rail Trains in N.C.: Missing LYNX? Mecklenburg Times, Aug. 19, 2008. LexisNexis Academic.
15. Cimino K. Rail Route: UNCC, Yes—Crossing I-485, No. Charlotte Observer, June 29, 2006, p. 1B.
16. LaCour G. Light Rail Tab Unveiled. Charlotte Observer, Oct. 2, 2006, p. 1B.
17. Hiawatha Light-Rail Transit: Facts. Metropolitan Council. http://www.metrocouncil.org/about/facts/HiawathaLRTFacts.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2011.
18. Davis J.S., and Seskin S. Effects of Urban Density on Rail Transit. Land Lines, Vol. 8, No. 3. http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/516_Effects-of-Urban-Density-on-Rail-Transit. Accessed Feb. 24, 2011.
19. Harrison S. UNCC at the End of Lynx Line. Charlotte Observer, Dec. 16, 2010. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2008/10/11/248160/use-transit-travel-smart.html. Accessed Jan. 30, 2011.
20. Levinson H.S., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., and Gast J. Bus Rapid Transit: Synthesis of Case Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1841, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 1–11.
21. Liu R., Yang F., and Chen M. Understanding the Shared Operation of Commuter Rail Transit and Freight Railroads. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2004. http://www.trforum.org/journal/2005spr/article10.php. Accessed July 7, 2010.
22. Black A. Urban Mass Transit. McGraw-Hill, 1995.
23. Marshall N., and Grady B. Sketch Transit Modeling Based on 2000 Census Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1986, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 182–189.
24. Farkas A. An Intelligent GIS-Based Route/Site Selection Plan of a Metro-Rail Network. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 243, 2009, pp. 719–734.
25. Samanta S., and Jha M. K. Identifying Feasible Locations for Rail Transit Stations: Two-Stage Analytical Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 81–88.
26. Horner M.W., and Grubesic T. H. A GIS-Based Planning Approach to Locating Urban Rail Terminals. Transportation, Vol. 28, 2001, pp. 55–77.
27. Farhan B., and Murray A. T. A GIS-Based Approach for Delineating Market Areas for Park and Ride Facilities. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 9, 2005, pp. 91–108.
28. Andersen J.L., and Landex A. GIS-Based Approaches to Catchment Area Analyses of Mass Transit. Proc., Environmental Systems Research Institute User Conference, 2009. http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc09/uc/papers/pap_1072.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2011.
29. Metrolina Regional Travel Demand Model Memorandum of Agreement. Mecklenburg–Union Metropolitan Planning Organization, Feb. 19, 2009. http://www.mumpo.org/PDFs/Resources/MetrolinaRegional-TravelDemandModelMemorandumOfAgreement.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2011.
30. Kittelson and Associates, Inc., KFH Group, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglass, Inc., and K. Hunter-Zaworski. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp100/part%200.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2011.
31. MetroTransit. http://www.metrotransit.org/Schedules/WebSchedules.aspx?route=888. Accessed April 4, 2011.
32. Regional Transportation Authority. http://www.musiccitystar.org/ticketsschedules.html. Accessed April 4, 2011.
33. New Mexico Rail Runner Express. http://nmrailrunner.com/schedule.asp. Accessed April 4, 2011.
34. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. http://www.capmetro.org/MetroRail/schedules.asp. Accessed April 4, 2011.
35. Commuter Rail Overview. Presentation to the Northeast Florida Regional Leadership Academy by Gannett Fleming. http://www.nefrla.com/What_is_Commuter_Rail.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2011.
36. Track Improvements: Greensboro–Charlotte. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Rail Division. http://www.bytrain.org/track/groclt.html. Accessed April 3, 2011.
37. Nashville: Bargain-Priced Regional “Commuter” Rail Starter Line Project Under Way. Light Rail Now, Jan. 2005. http://www.lightrailnow.org/news/n_nsh_2005-01.htm. Accessed April 4, 2011.
38. Commuter Rail on a Budget. Progressive Railroading, Jan. 2007. http://www.progressiverailroading.com/pr/article/Commuter-rail-on-a-budget—13215. Accessed April 4, 2011.
39. Music City Star Ridership Well Below Projections. City Paper, May 2, 2007. http://nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/music-city-star-ridership-well-below-projections. Accessed April 4, 2011.
40. Northstar Commuter Rail Facts. Metropolitan Council. http://www.metrocouncil.org/transportation/NS/NSFacts.htm. Accessed April 3, 2011.
41. Rail Transit Strategic Plan. Indian Nations Council of Governments. http://www.incog.org/transportation/documents/RailTransitStrategicPlanFinal.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2011.
42. Freemark Y. With Modest Expectations, Austin Opens Rail Line After Years of Delays. Transport Politic, March 22, 2010. http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/22/with-modest-expectations-austin-opens-rail-line-after-years-of-delays. Accessed April 3, 2011.
43. CPI Inflation Calculator. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 19
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
