Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Competition from the Curb: Survey of Passengers on Discount Curbside Bus Operators in Eastern and Midwestern U.S. Cities

Abstract

To foster a greater understanding of the composition and preferences of travelers served by discount curbside bus operators, this study summarizes the results of a survey of such passengers. The study compares the characteristics of passengers using the two largest operators, Bolt-Bus and Megabus, with those using conventional bus lines such as Greyhound. Surveys were administered in the three most heavily served curbside bus markets in the East and Midwest of the United States—six cities in total—and the result was a cumulative sample of 1,025 responses. Curbside bus service was shown to have generated much new travel, with newly generated trips accounting for 22.0% of all passengers. In the East, however, curbside bus service is taking many travelers from passenger trains. More than a third of those surveyed (34.0%) report that they would have ridden trains had curbside buses not been available. In all markets surveyed, ridership heavily comprised passengers in the group 18 to 25 years of age and was overwhelmingly made up of passengers traveling for pleasure or personal matters rather than for business. When the findings are interpreted broadly, they support the notion that the curbside bus phenomenon is not primarily the result of a shift in market share from conventional bus lines. The evidence instead suggests that curbside bus service should be regarded as a new mode that attracts most of its passengers from commercial flights, trains, and private automobiles and that it has grown dramatically, despite the relative lack of business travelers.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Austen B. The Megabus Effect. Business Week, April 7, 2011. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_16/b4224062391848.htm.
2. Surface Transportation: The Availability of Intercity Bus Service Continues to Decline. Report GAO/RECD-92-126. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., 1992. http://www.legistorm.com/score_gao/show/id/21922.html. Accessed Sept. 17, 2010.
3. Walsh M. 2000. Making Connections: The Long-Distance Bus Industry in the USA. Ashgate, Aldershot, United Kingdom.
4. Grengs J. Intercity Bus and Passenger Rail Study. University of Michigan Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, 2009.
5. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Intercity Bus Network Study. Final Report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2010.
6. Florida Intercity Bus Service Needs Assessment and Action Plan. Florida Intercity Bus Service Tech Memo One: Baseline Conditions. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2009.
7. Mattson J., Peterson D., Thoms W., Ripplinger D., and Hough J. Assessing Demand for Rural Intercity Transportation in a Changing Environment. Small Urban and Rural Transit Center, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University, Fargo, 2010.
8. Higgins L., Warner J., Morgan C., and Dunham P. Examining Long-Distance Express Buses as an Extension of and Feeder to Passenger Rail Systems. University Transportation Center for Mobility, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2011.
9. Fischer L., and Schwieterman J. The Decline and Recovery of Intercity Bus Service in the United States: A Comeback for an Environmentally Friendly Transportation Mode? Environmental Practice, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2011, pp. 7–15.
10. Klein N. J. Emergent Curbside Intercity Bus Industry: Chinatown and Beyond. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2111, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 83–89.
11. Johnson-Chase, K. All's Fare in Travel by Bus: Cheaper Prices, Free Access to the Internet, Driving Local, US Ridership Higher. Boston Globe, Nov. 17, 2009.
12. Schwieterman J.P., and Fischer L. 2009. Privacy Invades Public Space: The Rising Use of Portable Electronic Technology on Intercity Buses, Trains, and Planes, 2009–2010. Chaddick Institute Policy Study, Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University, Chicago, Ill. las.depaul.edu/Chaddick. Accessed Dec. 22, 2009.
13. Bennett R.D., and Craun J. M. The Airline Deregulation Evolution Continues: The Southwest Effect. Office of Aviation Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993.
14. Ritter J. Southwest Airlines: An In-Depth Review. In The Southwest Effect, Graduate Seminar BA-590, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Fla.
15. Fischer L.A., and Schwieterman J. P. Variations in the Rates of Passenger Usage of Portable Technology on Intercity Buses, Trains, and Planes: Implications for Transportation Planning. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Joseph Schwieterman
Chaddick Institute of Metropolitan Development, School of Public Service, DePaul University, 243 South Wabash Avenue, Chicago, IL 60604
Lauren Ames Fischer
Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, Columbia University, 400 Avery Hall, 1172 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 22

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Direct to your destination: the size, scope and competitive status of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A comparative life-cycle energy and emissions analysis for intercity p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub