Ensemble Tree Approach to Estimating Work Zone Capacity
Abstract
Accurate estimation of work zone capacity is necessary for successful traffic control management at work zones. This study uses an ensemble tree approach to estimate work zone capacity more accurately than would a model that was based on a single decision tree. A bootstrap aggregation method is used to build an ensemble tree comprising a set of individual decision trees. In this method, a set of bootstrap samples is generated by sampling with replacement from a training sample. A set of individual trees is then constructed with a tree learning algorithm and combined through averaging of the output. Data on work zone capacity from 14 states and cities are used in a case study to build and evaluate the ensemble tree. The results of the statistical comparison demonstrate that the ensemble tree outperforms the existing models of work zone capacity in estimation accuracy. The ensemble tree also performs better than any single decision tree for stability. A comparison with the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual indicates that the ensemble tree can provide a more accurate estimate of work zone capacity. Unlike the manual's model, the ensemble tree avoids estimated errors caused by subjective judgments of users because it does not require manual setting of various adjustment factors. Because of its high estimation accuracy and stability, the ensemble tree is a good alternative for estimating work zone capacity, especially for inexperienced users.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Meng Q., and Weng J. A Cellular Automata Model for Work Zone Traffic. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2188, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 131–139.
2. Meng Q., and Weng J. An Improved Cellular Automata Model for Heterogeneous Work Zone Traffic. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 19, 2011, pp. 1263–1275.
3. Meng Q., Weng J., and Qu X. A Probabilistic Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for the Long-Term Work Zone Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, 2010, pp. 1866–1877.
4. Weng J., and Meng Q. Modeling Speed-Flow Relationship and Merging Behavior at Work Zone Merging Areas. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 19, 2011, pp. 985–996.
5. Heaslip K., Kondyli A., Arguea D., Elefteriadou L., and Sullivan F. Estimation of Freeway Work Zone Capacity Through Simulation and Field Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2130, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 16–24.
6. Krammes R.A., and Lopez G. O. Updated Capacity Values for Short-Term Freeway Work Zone Lane Closures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1442, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 49–56.
7. Dixon K.K., Hummer J.E., and Lorscheider A. R. Capacity for North Carolina Freeway Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record, No. 1529, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 27–34.
8. Lovell D.J., Kim T., and Paracha J. New Methodology to Estimate Capacity for Freeway Work Zones. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
9. Benekohal R.F., Kaja-Mohideen A.-Z., and Chitturi M. V. Methodology for Estimating Operating Speed and Capacity in Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1883, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 103–111.
10. Ping W.V., and Zhu K. Evaluation of Work Zone Capacity Estimation Models: A Computer Simulation Study. Presented at Sixth Asia-Pacific Transportation Development Conference, Hong Kong, 2006.
11. Sarasua W.A., Davis W.J., Chowdhury M.A., and Ogle J. H. Estimating Interstate Highway Capacity for Short-Term Work Zone Lane Closures: Development of Methodology. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1948, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 45–57.
12. Al-Kaisy A., and Hall F. Guidelines for Estimating Capacity at Freeway Reconstruction Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 5, 2003, pp. 572–577.
13. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
14. Weng J., and Meng Q. Decision Tree-Based Model for Estimation of Work Zone Capacity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2257, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 40–50.
15. Breiman L. Stacked Regressions. Machine Learning, Vol. 24, 1996, pp. 49–64.
16. Freund Y., and Schapire R. Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. In Proc., 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1996, pp. 148–156.
17. Bauer E., and Kohavi R. An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting and Variants. Machine Learning, Vol. 36, 1999, pp. 105–139.
18. Huang C., and Chen J. H. A Selective Ensemble Based on Expected Probabilities for Bankruptcy Prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2009, pp. 5297–5303.
19. Adeli H., and Jiang X. Neuro-Fuzzy Logic Model for Freeway Work Zone Capacity Estimation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 5, 2003, pp. 484–493.
20. Al-Kaisy A., and Hall F. Examination of Effect of Driver Population at Freeway Reconstruction Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1776, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 35–42.
21. Dietterich T. G. Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning. Multiple Classifier Systems, Vol. 1857, 2001, pp. 1–15.
22. Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., and Stone C. J. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole Advanced Books and Software, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1984.
23. Quinlan J. R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, Calif., 1993.
24. Dudek C.L., and Richards S. H. Traffic Capacity Through Work Zones on Urban Freeways. FHWA/TX-81/28+228-6. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 1981.
25. Jiang Y. Traffic Capacity, Speed, and Queue-Discharge Rate of Indiana's Four-lane Freeway Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1657, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 10–17.
26. Al-Kaisy A., Zhou M., and Hall F. New Insights into Freeway Capacity at Work Zones: Empirical Case Study. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
27. Heaslip K., Louisell C., and Collura J. Driver Population Adjustment Factors for Highway Capacity Manual Work Zone Capacity Equation. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
28. Borchard D.W., Pesti G., Sun D., and Ding L. Capacity and Road User Cost Analysis of Selected Freeway Work Zones in Texas. FHWA/ TX-09/0-5619-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2009.
29. Karim A., and Adeli H. Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Work Zone Capacity and Queue Estimation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 5, 2003, pp. 494–503.
30. Abellan J., and Moral S. Upper Entropy of Credal Sets: Applications to Credal Classification. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 235–255.
31. Opitz D., and Maclin R. Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Vol. 11, 1999, pp. 169–198.
32. Fayyad U.M., and Irani K. B. Multi-interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning. Proc., 13th Inter national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993, pp. 1022–1027.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 50
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 14
- Saturation Flow Rate at the Work Zone–Straddled Intersections with Int...
- Driving Safety Assurance Method in Work Zone Crossovers of Highway Rec...
- Analysis of Headway and Speed Based on Driver Characteristics and Work...
- Review of Methods for Estimating Construction Work Zone Capacity
- Nonrecurrent Congestion
- Driver Behavior Models for Heavy Vehicles and Passenger Cars at a Work...
- A hierarchical machine learning classification approach for secondary ...
- Uncertainty-based prediction of work zone capacity using a Bayesian ap...
- Development of a Pavement Marking Life Cycle Cost Tool
- Probability distribution-based model for work zone capacity prediction
- Modeling traffic crash rates of road segments through a lognormal hurd...
- New Methodology to Determine Work Zone Capacity Distribution
- Estimating capacity and traffic delay in work zones: An overview
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
