	New content
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Restricted access

Research article

First published online January 1, 2012

Consumer Perceptions and Use of Driving Distance of Electric Vehicles: Changes Over Time Through Lifestyle Learning Process

Justin Woodjack [email protected], Dahlia Garas, Andy Lentz, Thomas Turrentine, Gil Tal, and Michael NicholasView all authors and affiliations

Volume 2287, Issue 1

https://doi.org/10.3141/2287-01

Abstract

Popular media and even researchers commonly assume that ownership of a battery electric vehicle (BEV) provides consumers less performance and mobility than consumers expect. A common claim is that consumers have constant worry about the range of their BEVs, often termed “range anxiety.” BMW converted 450 Mini Coopers to all-electric drive (named the Mini E) and leased them to fleets and 235 private households in the Los Angeles, California, and New York–New Jersey regions from spring 2009 to spring 2010. Through the course of the 1-year lease, University of California, Davis (UCD), researchers conducted multiple online surveys and in-person interviews and administered weeklong driving diaries. This paper explores the reactions of Mini E drivers to the driving distance of the Mini E through the framework of a lifestyle learning process. Over time, Mini E drivers learned how the 104-mi range of the Mini E fit into their lifestyles. Drivers adapted and explored with their Mini E through activities such as altering driving behavior (such as speed and trip routes), optimizing charging opportunities, planning trips, and educating themselves on distances to destinations with the help of online and mobile mapping tools. In the course of the UCD Mini E consumer study, researchers found evidence suggesting that the driving range was not a major concern for these early adopters. Even with no public charging available to their vehicle, 100% of survey respondents stated that BEVs were suitable for daily use. The results of this study will be of interest to policy makers and practitioners interested in expanding the BEV market.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Axsen J., and Kurani K. S. The Early U.S. Market for PHEVs: Anticipating Consumer Awareness, Recharge Potential, Design Priorities, and Energy Impacts. UCD-ITS-RR-08-22. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis, 2008.

Google Scholar

2. Axsen J., Mountain D.C., and Jaccard M. Combining Stated and Revealed Choice Research to Simulate the Neighbor Effect: The Case of Hybrid-Electric Vehicles. Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2009, pp. 221–238.

Crossref

Google Scholar

3. Christensen C.M., Talukdar S., Alton R., and Horn M. B. Picking Green Tech's Winners and Losers. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2011.

Google Scholar

4. Hickman L. Will Electric Cars Ever Take Over Our Roads? Guardian, July 10, 2011.

Google Scholar

5. Turrentine T.S., Garas D., Lentz A., and Woodjack J. The UC Davis Mini E Consumer Study. UCD-ITS-RR-11-05. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis, 2011.

Google Scholar

6. Lee-Gosselin M. E. H. Scope and Potential of Interactive Stated Response Data Collection Methods. In Conference Proceedings 10: Household Travel Surveys: New Concepts and Research Needs, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 115–133.

Google Scholar

7. Turrentine T., Lee-Gosselin M., Kurani K., and Sperling D. A Study of Adaptive and Optimizing Behavior for Electric Vehicles Based on Interactive Simulation Games and Revealed Behavior of Electric Vehicle Owners. Proc., World Conference on Transport Research, Lyon, France, World Conference on Transport Research Society, Lyon, France, 1992.

Google Scholar

8. Kurani K.S., Turrentine T., and Sperling D. Demand for Electric Vehicles in Hybrid Households: An Exploratory Analysis. Transport Policy, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1994, pp. 244–256.

Crossref

Google Scholar

9. Pentland B.T., and Feldman M. S. Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization. Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2007, pp. 781–795.

Crossref

Google Scholar

10. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1991.

Google Scholar

11. Kurani K.S., and Turrentine T.S. Household Adaptations to New Personal Transport Options: Constraints and Opportunities in Household Activity Space. In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges (Mahmassani H.S., ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2002, pp. 43–69.

Google Scholar

12. Center for Transportation Analysis, U.S. Department of Energy. Table 8.9. In Transportation Energy Databook, 29th ed. 2010. http://cta.ornl.gov/data/index.shtml.

Google Scholar

13. Santos A., McGuckin N., Nakamoto H.Y., Gray D., and Liss S. Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.

Google Scholar

14. Turrentine T.S., Kurani K.S., and Sperling T. The Household Market for Electric Vehicles: Testing the Hybrid Household Hypothesis—A Reflexively Designed Survey of New-Car-Buying, Multi-Vehicle California Households. UCD-ITS-RR-95-5. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis, 1995.

Google Scholar

Cite article

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Transportation Research Record

Volume 2287, Issue 1

Pages: 1 - 8

Article first published online: January 1, 2012

Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions