Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Optimal Deployment of Emission Reduction Technologies for Large Fleets

Abstract

In states that have serious air quality problems, such as Texas and California, public fleet managers are under pressure to reduce emissions of their fleets. This paper presents an improved optimization framework for determining the most cost-effective assignment of emission reduction technologies to the vehicles in a large fleet and applies it in a much larger setting than previously done in the literature (in relation to fleet size, geographical area, and numbers of pollutants and technologies). Although the improved framework is applicable to any large setting, this study uses the fleet of the Texas Department of Transportation (DOT) as one example. An explanation of the three components of the framework (i.e., fleet data preprocessing, emissions rate estimation, and the binary integer programming optimization model) is followed by the presentation of two scenarios in which the framework is applied to the whole Texas DOT fleet. The resulting optimal deployment of nine technologies and five pollutants is reported. The improved framework uses weighting schemes for counties and pollutants that allow the optimization model itself to choose the best budget distribution strategy from an arbitrary number of possibilities acceptable to the decision maker. In contrast, previous frameworks could consider only an extremely small number of budget distribution strategies for counties.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Air Resources Board, California Environmental Protection Agency. ARB Fact Sheet: Air Pollution and Health. 2009. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/health/fs/fs1/fs1.htm. Accessed May 5, 2011.
2. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Environmental Effects of Air Pollution. http://www.mass.gov/dep/air/aq/env_effects.htm. Accessed May 7, 2011.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act: Why Should You Be Concerned About Air Pollution? 2008. http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/peg/concern.html. Accessed May 1, 2011.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mobile Source Emissions: Past, Present, and Future. 2007. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/invntory/overview/pollutants/index.htm. Accessed May 1, 2011.
5. Bari M.E., Zietsman J., Quadrifoglio L., and Farzaneh M. Optimal Deployment of Emissions Reduction Technologies for Construction Equipment. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 61, No. 6, 2011, pp. 611–630.
6. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. About Air Pollution in Texas. http://www.tceq.texas.gov/p2/P2Recycle/P2Week/airpollution.html. Accessed June 10, 2011.
7. Wolsey L.A., and Nemhauser G. L. Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1988.
8. Eshwar K., and Kumar V. S. S. Optimal Deployment of Construction Equipment Using Linear Programming with Fuzzy Coefficients. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2004, pp. 27–33.
9. Swersey A.J., and Thakur L. S. An Integer Programming Model for Locating Vehicle Emissions Testing Stations. Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1995, pp. 496–512.
10. Matsukura H., Udommahuntisuk M., Yamato H., and Dinariyana A. A. B. Estimation of CO2 Reduction for Japanese Domestic Container Transportation Based on Mathematical Models. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2010, pp. 34–43.
11. Golias M., Boile M., Theofanis S., and Efstathiou C. The Berth-Scheduling Problem. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2166, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 20–27.
12. What is Retrofit? Diesel Technology Forum, 2006. http://www.dieselforum.org/index.cfm?objectid=D6AFC0F0-8164-11E0-89D2000C296BA163 Accessed June 27, 2011.
13. Exhaust and Crankcase Emission Factors for Non-Road Engine Modeling—Compression–Ignition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.
14. Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator Highway Vehicle Implementation (MOVES-HVI) Demonstration Version Software Design and Reference Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.
16. Retrofitting Emission Controls for Diesel-Powered Vehicles. Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association, Arlington, Va. 2009.
17. Aftermarket Converter Technology for Gasoline Light-Duty Vehicles. Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association, Arlington, Va. 2009.
18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Diesel Retrofit Technology Verification. 2011. http://epa.gov/cleandiesel/verification/verif-list.htm. Accessed May 19, 2011.
19. Lee D.W., Zietsman J., Farazaneh M., Protopapas A., and Overman J. Characterization of In-Use Emissions from TxDOT's Nonroad Equipment Fleet-Phase 1. 0-5955-1. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2008.
20. Air Resources Board, California Environmental Protection Agency. Verification Procedure—Currently Verified. http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm. Accessed March 15, 2011.
21. Nonroad Diesel Emissions Reduction Study. Genesis Engineering, Inc., North Vancouver, and Levelton Engineering, Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, 2003, pp. 78–93.
22. Highway Economic Requirements System, State Version (HERS-ST, ver. 2.0). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002, pp. E9–E10.
23. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis—Air Pollution Costs. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2006.
24. Damages Per Tonne Emission of PM2.5, NH3, SO2, NOx and VOCs From Each EU25 Member State, Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Programme. AEA Technology Environment, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, 2005.
25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Emission Facts: Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel. 2005. http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05001.htm. Accessed May 7, 2011.
26. U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update. http://www.eia.gov/oog/info/gdu/gasdiesel.asp. Accessed June 10, 2011.
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Currently Designated Nonattainment Areas for All Criteria Pollutants. 2011. http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/ancl.html. Accessed June 5, 2011.
28. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Texas State Implementation Plan. http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/sip/texas-sip. Accessed March 12, 2011.
29. Window on State Government. Texas in Focus: A Statewide View of Opportunities. http://www.window.state.tx.us/specialrpt/tif/energy.html#exhibit18. Accessed May 7, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamadreza Farzaneh
Texas A&M Transportation Institute Air Quality Studies, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX 77843-3135.
Gokhan Memisoglu
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3131.
Kiavash Kianfar
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3131.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. High-Fidelity Modeling of Light-Duty Vehicle Emission and Fuel Economy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Optimizing the Use of Electric Vehicles in a Regional Car Rental Fleet
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub