Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Estimation of Energy Use by Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Validating Gamma Distribution for Representing Random Daily Driving Distance

Abstract

The fuel and electricity consumptions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) are sensitive to the variation of daily vehicle miles traveled (DVMT). Although some researchers have assumed that DVMT follows a gamma distribution, such an assumption has yet to be validated. On the basis of continuous travel data from the Global Positioning System for 382 vehicles, each tracked for at least 183 days, the authors of this study validated the gamma assumption in the context of PHEV energy analysis. Small prediction errors caused by the gamma assumption were found in PHEV fuel use, electricity use, and energy cost. Validating the reliability of the gamma distribution paves the way for its application in energy use analysis of PHEVs in the real world. The gamma distribution can be easily specified with few pieces of driver information and is relatively easy for mathematical manipulation. Validation with real world travel data enables confident use of the gamma distribution in a variety of applications, such as the development of vehicle consumer choice models, the quantification of range anxiety for battery electric vehicles, the investigation of the role of charging infrastructure, and the construction of online calculators that provide personal estimates of PHEV energy use.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Committee on Assessment of Resource Needs for Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Technologies. Transition to Alternative Transportation Technologies—A Focus on Hydrogen. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008.
2. Committee on Assessment of Resource Needs for Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Technologies. Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies—Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2009.
3. Axsen J., and Kurani K. S. Anticipating Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle Energy Impacts in California: Constructing Consumer-Informed Recharge Profiles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009, pp. 212–219.
4. Vyas A., Santini D., and Johnson L. Potential of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles to Reduce Petroleum Use: Issues Involved in Developing Reliable Estimates. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2139, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 55–63.
5. Lin Z., and Greene D. L. Assessing Energy Impact of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Significance of Daily Distance Variation over Time and Among Drivers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2252, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 99–106.
6. Pas E.I., and Sundar S. Intrapersonal Variability in Daily Urban Travel Behavior: Some Additional Evidence. Transportation, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1995, pp. 135–150.
7. Pendyala R.M., and Pas E. I. Multi-Day and Multi-Period Data for Travel Demand Analysis and Modeling. In Transportation Research Circular E-C008: Transportation Surveys: Raising the Standard, TRB, National Research Council, 2000.
8. Elango V.V., Guensler R.L., and Ogle J. H. Day-to-Day Travel Variability in the Commute Atlanta, Georgia, Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2014, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 39–49.
9. Hamilton W. Prospects for Electric Cars: Electric Vehicle Impact Assessment Study. Final report. Division of Transportation Energy Conservation, U.S. Department of Energy, 1978.
10. Kiselewich S.J., and Hamilton W. F. Electrification of Household Travel by Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. SAE technical paper series No. 820452, SAE International, Warrendale, Pa., 1982.
11. Gonder J., Markel T., Simpson A., and Thornton M. Using GPS Travel Data to Assess the Real World Driving Energy Use of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs). NREL/CP 540-40858. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Department of Energy, Golden, Colo., 2007.
12. Utility Factor Definitions for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Travel Survey Data. Standard J2841. Hybrid Committee, SAE International, Warrendale, Pa. 2010.
13. Pearre N.S., Kempton W., Guensler R.L., and Elango V. V. Electric Vehicles: How Much Range Is Required for a Day's Driving? Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1171–1184.
14. Traut E., Hendrickson C.T., Klampfl E., Liu Y., and Michalek J. J. Optimal Design and Allocation of Electrified Vehicles and Dedicated Charging Infrastructure for Minimum Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
15. Greene D. L. Estimating Daily Vehicle Usage Distributions and the Implications for Limited-Range Vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1985, pp. 347–358.
16. Lin Z., and Greene D. Promoting the Market for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles: Role of Recharge Availability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2252, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 49–56.
17. 2001 National Household Travel Survey. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
18. Traffic Choices Study: Summary Report. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, Wash. 2008.
19. Fan Y., and Nie Y. Optimal Routing for Maximizing the Travel Time Reliability. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2006, pp. 333–344.
20. Davis S.C., Diegel S.W., and Boundy R. G. Transportation Energy Databook, 29th ed. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2011.
21. Annual Energy Outlook 2011: With Projections to 2035. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, 2011.
22. Plotkin S., Singh M., Patterson P., Ward J., Wood F., Kydes N., Holte J., Moore J., Miller G., Das S., Rousseau A., Sharer P., and Pagerit S. Multi-Path Study, Phase 2: Vehicle Characterization and Key Results of Scenario Analysis. Argonne National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne, Ill., 2009.
23. Byrd R.H., Lu P., Nocedal J., and Zhu C. A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1995, pp. 1190–1208.
24. Lin Z., and Greene D. The MA3T Model: Projecting Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle Demand and Impact with Detailed Market Segmentation. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
25. Lin Z., Greene D., and Leiby P. N. Range Optimization for Fuel Cell Vehicles. 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Hydrogen Fuels Cells Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. June 7–11, 2010.
26. Lin Z., and Greene D. Predicting Individual Fuel Economy. International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2011, pp. 84–95.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhenhong Lin
National Transportation Research Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2360 Cherahala Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932.
Jing Dong
National Transportation Research Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2360 Cherahala Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932.
Changzheng Liu
National Transportation Research Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2360 Cherahala Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932.
David Greene
National Transportation Research Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2360 Cherahala Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 123

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 51

  1. An empirical analysis of electric vehicles ’ charging patterns
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Carbon Emission Variations for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles after ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Uncertainty-aware energy management strategies for PV-assisted refuell...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Interaction of Consumer Heterogeneity and Technological Progress in th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A Data-Driven Management Strategy of Electric Vehicles and Thermostati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Empirical Analysis of Electric Vehicles’ Charging Patterns: Case Study...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Empirical Analysis of Electric Vehicles’ Charging Patterns: Case Study...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Actual Electricity Utility Factor of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle utility factor in China cities: Influe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Factors affecting adoption of electric vehicles in India: An explorato...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Travel pattern variation effects on utility factor after COVID-19: an ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The expected-based value-at-risk and expected shortfall using quantile...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Utilization of battery-electric vehicles in two-car households: Empiri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Range cost-effectiveness of plug-in electric vehicle for heterogeneous...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. The impact of reliable range estimation on battery electric vehicle fe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Hazard Duration Model with Panel Data for Daily Car Travel Distance: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Optimal Driving Range for Battery Electric Vehicles Based on Modeling ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Modeling charging infrastructure impact on the electric vehicle market...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Intensity and daily pattern of passenger vehicle use by region and cla...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Seasonal effects on electric vehicle energy consumption and driving ra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Heterogeneity in Economic and Carbon Benefits of Electric Technology V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Characterization of Daily Travel Distance of a University Car Fleet fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Examining the case for long-range battery electric vehicles with a gen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Free Charging: Exploratory Study of Its Impact on Electric Vehicle Sal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Two methods of estimating long-distance driving to understand range re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Mesoscopic Approach to Modeling Electric Vehicle Fleets based upon Dri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Could a bioenergy program stimulate electric vehicle market penetratio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Ownership and Usage Analysis of Alternative Fuel Vehicles in the Unite...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. An Investigation of Battery Electric Vehicle Driving and Charging Beha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Will Advanced Public Charging Infrastructure Speed Up Electrification ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Factors Influencing Energy Consumption and Cost-Competiveness of Plug-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Role of workplace charging opportunities on adoption of plug-in electr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Relative economic competitiveness of light-duty battery electric and f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. The use of electric vehicles: A case study on adding an electric car t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Socially optimal replacement of conventional with electric vehicles fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Multiple battery capacity design for EVs considering heterogeneous DVM...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Range and Battery Depletion Concerns with Electric Vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Battery capacity design for electric vehicles considering the diversit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Effect of Electric Vehicle's Driving Range on Purchasing Intention
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Modeling Charging Choices of Small-Battery Plug-In Hybrid Electric Veh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles’ utility factors using GP...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. A trip-purpose based model of Plug-in Electric Vehicle charging demand
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: How individual movement patterns aff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Rapid estimation of electric vehicle acceptance using a general descri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Network Route Choice Model for Battery Electric Vehicle Drivers with D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Optimizing and Diversifying Electric Vehicle Driving Range for U.S. Dr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Battery Sizing for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Beijing: A TCO...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Cost analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using GPS-based long...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Stochastic Modeling of Battery Electric Vehicle Driver Behavior...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Hydrogen vehicles: Impacts of DOE technical targets on market acceptan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Plug-In Electric Cars for Work Travel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub