Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Shear- and Tension-Type Tests to Evaluate Bonding of Hot-Mix Asphalt Layers with Different Tack Coat Application Rates

Abstract

Bonding between adjacent pavement layers is an important factor affecting overlay service life. Poor bonding between adjacent layers of hot-mix asphalt can lead to distresses in the pavement system, such as slippage cracking, top-down cracking, premature fatigue, and, in some cases, complete delamination. Although interface behavior between different pavement layers is important, there is no consensus about the best testing technique for bonding. Interface bonding is usually assessed for shear strength. Considering that interface debonding can be caused by both shear and tension loading and that the optimum tack coats obtained from shear-type and tension-type interface tests may differ, a study to compare shear and tension testing results was conceived and carried out. When optimum tack coat rates as obtained from shear-type and tension-type interface tests were obtained and compared, a significantly higher tack coat rate was needed to create a strong adhesive bond between layers than the optimum rate suggested by shear type tests. In addition, shear- and tension-type tests produced difference rankings in tack coat types in their expected performance under shearing and tensile forces, respectively. It is recommended that tension-type tests, such as the interface bond test, be used along with shear-type tests in the design and control of tack coats and thin-bonded overlay systems and that additional studies be performed to develop a system that allows the holistic optimization of pavement bond on the basis of meeting functional requirements in both shear and tension for a given pavement system, traffic level, and environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Shahin M., Van Dam T., Kirchner K., and Blackmon E. W. Consequence of Layer Separation on Pavement Performance. Report DOT/FAA/ PM-86/48. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 1987.
2. Romanoschi S. A. Characterization of Pavement Layer Interfaces. PhD dissertation. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 1999.
3. West R., Zhang J., and Moore J. Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Pavement Layers. Report 05–08. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, Ala., 2005.
4. Khweir K., and Fordyce D. Influence of Layer Bonding on the Prediction of Pavement Life. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering–Transport, Vol. 156, 2003, pp. 73–83.
5. Leng Z., Ozer H., Al-Qadi I. L., and Carpenter S. H. Interface Bonding Between Hot-Mix Asphalt and Various Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces: Laboratory Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2057, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 46–53.
6. Mohammad L.N., Bae A., Elseifi M.A., Button J.W., and Scherocman J. A. Evaluation of Bond Strength of Tack Coat Materials in Field: Development of Pull-Off Test Device and Methodology. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2126, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 1–11.
7. Tashman L., Nam K., and Papagiannakis T. Evaluation of the Influence of Tack Coat Construction Factors on the Bond Strength Between Pavement Layers. Washington Center for Asphalt Technology, Pullman, 2006.
8. ATacker, A Tack Coat Testing Device, Operator's Guide. InstroTek, Inc., Raleigh, N.C., 2005.
9. Eedula S.R., and Tandon V. Tack Coat Field Acceptance Criterion. Report FHWA/TX-06/0-5216-1. Center for Transportation Infrastructure Systems, University of Texas at El Paso, 2006.
10. Mohammad L., Raqib M.A., and Huang N. B. Influence of Asphalt Tack Coat Materials on Interface Shear Strength. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 56–65.
11. Donovan E.P., Al-Qadi I. L., and Loulizi A. Optimization of Tack Coat Application Rate for Geocomposite Membrane on Bridge Decks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1740, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 143–150.
12. Raab C., and Partl M. Interlayer Shear Performance: Experience with Different Pavement Structures. Proc., 4th Eurasphalt and Eurobitumen Congress, Vienna, Austria, 2004.
13. Woods M. E. Laboratory Evaluation of Tensile and Shear Strengths of Asphalt Tack Coats. MS thesis. Mississippi State University, Starkville, 2004.
14. Dave E.V., Ahmed A., Buttlar W.G., Bausano J., and Lynn T. Investigation of Strain Tolerant Mixture Reflective Crack Relief Systems: An Integrated Approach. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 79, 2010, pp. 119–154.
15. Patel N. B. Factors Affecting the Interface Shear Strength of Pavement Layers. Master's dissertation. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2010.
16. Hakimzadeh S., Kebede N.A., Buttlar W.G., Ahmed S., and Exline M. Development of Fracture Energy Based Interface Bond Test for Asphalt Concrete. Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design (RMPD), Vol. 13, No. 51, 2012, pp. 76–87.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Salman Hakimzadeh
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
William G. Buttlar
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Rudolph Santarromana
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 53

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 17

  1. Interface Bonding Strength between Asphalt Pavement Layers under Mixed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Effects of interlayer surface characteristics on the interface bonding...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Evaluation of the Polymer Modified Tack Coat on Aged Concrete Pavement...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Review: Shear Properties and Various Mechanical Tests in the Interface...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Comparison of Bond Strength Evaluation Methods Between Pavement Layers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Finite element analysis of thermal-induced reflective cracking in comp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Investigation of premature failure mechanism in pavement overlay of na...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Synthesis and Performance Evaluation of Modified Asphalt–Based Trackle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Long-term performance of fiber-grid-reinforced asphalt overlay pavemen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. In situ measurements of emulsion application rates
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Effect of Emulsion Type on Bond Behavior of Asphalt Concrete Layers in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Application of tack coat in pavement engineering
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Effect of tack coat application on interlayer shear strength of asphal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. State-of-the-art review of interface bond testing devices for pavement...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Asphalt Overlays
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Advanced shear tester for evaluation of asphalt concrete under constan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub