Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Effect of Train Arrival Time on Crash Frequency at Highway–Railroad Grade Crossings: General Classification Regression Model

Abstract

With the use of a general classification regression model, this study investigated the causal relationship between time to train arrival (TTA) and crash frequency at highway–railroad grade crossings. In particular, a stratified structure in the explanatory variables was used to avoid the collinearity problem generally confronted in linear regression models. TTA is a good estimate of rail sight distance and time to collision, and it could be used to predict crash frequency at a grade crossing. A 14-year crash data set accompanied by crossing inventory data including TTAs was collected for the empirical study. Study results indicated that a negative relationship between TTAs and crash frequencies was generally found for all types of trains. Similar causal relationships were also found in various combinations of both crossing attributes and crash characteristics. Sensitivity analysis on the variable combinations was also conducted to investigate the key risk factors that might result in traffic collisions at grade crossings. Policy implications based on the empirical study are discussed, and future research directions are recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Mineta N. Secretary's Action Plan on Highway–Rail Crossing Safety and Trespass Prevention. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2004.
2. Davies L. Annual Safety Performance Report 2006. Rail Safety and Standards Board, London, 2007.
3. Department of Statistics. Analysis of Traffic Accidents for the Taiwan Railway System. Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan, 2007.
4. Taiwan Railways Administration. Annual Railroad Safety Report in Taiwan. Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan, 2011.
5. Berg W.D., Knoblauch K., and Hucke W. Causal Factors in Railroad–Highway Grade Crossing Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 847, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 47–54.
6. Gou M., and Bellavigna-Ladoux O. Impact of Heavy Vehicles on Crossing Safety—Development of an Adapted Design Tool. Publication TP 14172E. Transport Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2003.
7. Ogden B. D. Railroad–Highway Grade Crossing Handbook, rev. 2nd ed. DTFH61-00-C-0003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
8. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, millennium ed. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
9. Jensen S. U. Passive Railroad–Highway Grade Crossings: Relevant Factors and Effects of Safety Measures. Technical Report, Trafitec, Denmark, 2007.
10. Gitelman V., and Hakkert A. S. The Evaluation of Road-Rail Crossing Safety with Limited Accident Statistics. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1997, pp. 171–179.
11. Austin R.D., and Carson J. L. An Alternative Accident Prediction Model for Highway–Rail Interfaces. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 31–42.
12. Saccomanno F.F., Fu L., and Miranda-Moreno L.F. Risk-Based Model for Identifying Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Blackspots. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1862, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 127–135.
13. Saccomanno F.F., Grossi R., Greco D., and Mehmood A. Identifying Black Spots Along Highway SS107 in Southern Italy Using Two Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 6, 2001, pp. 515–522.
14. Miranda-Moreno L.F., Fu L., Saccomanno F.F., and Labbe A. Alternative Risk Models for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–8.
15. Nam D., and Lee J. Accident Frequency Model Using Zero Probability Process. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1973, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 142–148.
16. Lord D., Washington S.P., and Ivan J. N. Poisson, Poisson-Gamma and Zero-Inflated Regression Models of Motor Vehicle Crashes: Balancing Statistical Fit and Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35–46.
17. Lord D., Washington S.P., and Ivan J. N. Further Notes on the Application of Zero-Inflated Models in Highway Safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2007, pp. 53–57.
18. Lord D., and Mannering F. The Statistical Analysis of Crash-Frequency Data: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2010, pp. 291–305.
19. Smith A. Level Crossing Safety Performance Report, June 2006. Rail Safety and Standards Board, London, 2006.
20. Cho H., and Rilett L. R. Improved Transition Preemption Strategy for Signalized Intersections Near At-Grade Railway Grade Crossing. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 8, 2007, pp. 443–454.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shou-Ren Hu
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan.
Jhy-Pyng Lin
Department of Project Construction, Taiwan Railways Administration, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan, 4F, No. 3 Beiping West Road, Taipei City 10041, Taiwan
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan City 70101 Taiwan.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 17

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Development of geopolymer using industrial waste materials
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Railway line capacity methods analysis and their application in “Lithu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Comparison Models Evaluating Countermeasures at Highway-Railway Grade ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Effects of Three Advanced Devices on Preventing Crashes and Gate-Break...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub