Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Simple, Inexpensive Approach to Sampling for Pedestrian and Bicycle Surveys: Approach Developed in Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey

Abstract

Many transportation planners undertake local surveys for a better understanding of the levels of walking and cycling of residents in their city or town. This paper explores the challenges of designing a robust sampling strategy for such surveys. A review of existing surveys on nonmotorized transportation demonstrated that many existing surveys used less than ideal sampling approaches for communities that were aiming to collect populationwide data on cycling and walking and thereby jeopardized the strength of their conclusions. Either surveys used approaches that were too expensive and complex for most communities to implement or surveys generated data that were not applicable to all residents in a community (i.e., data that were not generalizable to the full population). In response to that sampling problem, this paper presents a new method for collecting generalizable data: the sampling method developed in the Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey (PABS) project. PABS offers a rigorous, yet inexpensive, simple, and well-documented method to conduct surveys. The PABS mail-out–mail-back survey and probabilistic (generalizable) sampling approach can be performed in-house within municipal agencies. With the use of PABS, transportation professionals can obtain higher-quality data about their community as a whole than they would obtain with many of the other existing approaches. PABS is thus a useful complement to other sampling approaches such as intercept surveys (an important way to collect data on the use of specific facilities) or surveys distributed to e-mail lists (a cheap and useful way to collect qualitative data).

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Forsyth A., Krizek K.J., Agrawal A.W., and Stonebraker E. Reliability Testing of the PABS (Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey) Method. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2012 (forthcoming).
2. Forsyth A., Krizek K.J., and Agrawal A. W. Measuring Walking and Cycling Using the PABS (Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey) Approach: A Low-Cost Survey Method for Local Communities. Final report. Mineta Transportation Institute, San José State University, San Jose, Calif., 2010.
3. Krizek K.J., Forsyth A., and Agrawal A. W. Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey (PABS): User's Manual. http//www.designforhealth.net/resources/PABS.html. Accessed Dec. 30, 2010.
4. National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project. Alta Planning and Design, Portland, Ore., and ITE, Washington, D.C. http://bikepeddocumentation.org/. Accessed Feb. 29, 2011.
5. Hartgen D.T., and San Jose E. Costs and Trip Rates of Recent Household Travel Surveys. Hartgen Group, Charlotte, N.C., 2009. http://www.hartgengroup.net/Projects/National/USA/household_travel_summary/2009-11-11_Final_Report_Revised.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2010.
6. Dillman D. A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2007.
7. Fowler F. Survey Research Methods, 2nd ed. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., 1993.
8. Kish L. Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965.
9. Lohr S. L. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1999.
10. Mangione T. W. Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1995.
11. Vogt W. P. Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., 1993.
12. Forsyth A., Oakes J.M., and Schmitz K. H. Test–Retest Reliability of the Twin Cities Walking Survey. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2009, pp. 119–131.
13. Hansen K. M. The Effects of Incentives, Interview Length, and Interviewer Characteristics on Response Rates in a CATI Study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2006, pp. 112–121.
14. Oakes J.M., Forsyth A., Hearst M., and Schmitz K. H. Recruiting a Representative Sample for Neighborhood Effects Research: Strategies and Outcomes of the Twin Cities Walking Study. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2009, pp. 787–805.
15. Rogers A., Murtaugh M.A., Edwards S., and Slattery M. L. Contacting Controls: Are We Working Harder for Similar Response Rates, and Does It Make a Difference? American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 160, No. 1, 2004, pp. 85–90.
16. Rizzo L., Brick J.M., and Park I. A Minimally Intrusive Method for Sampling Persons in Random Digit Dial Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 2, 2004, pp. 267–274.
17. Singer E. Confidentiality, Risk Perception, and Survey Participation. Chance, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2004, pp. 31–35.
18. Teitler J.O., Reichman N.E., and Sprachman S. Costs and Benefits of Improving Response Rates for a Hard-to-Reach Population. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2003, pp. 126–138.
19. Ziegenfuss J., Beebe T.J., Rey E., Schleck C., Locke G. R. III, and Talley N. J. Internet Option in a Mail Survey: More Harm than Good? Epidemiology, Vol. 4, No. 21, 2010, pp. 485–586.
20. Leiman J.M., Bengelsdorf T., and Faussett K. Household Travel Surveys: Using Design Effects to Compare Alternative Sample Designs. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
21. Dijst M., Farag S., and de Blaeij A. Effects of Data Collection Methods in Travel Behavior Surveys: Comparing Internet and Mail Samples. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
22. Stinson M.A., and Bhat C. R. Frequency of Bicycle Commuting: Internet-Based Survey Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 122–130.
23. Edwards P., Roberts I., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Wentz R., and Kwan I. Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: A Systematic Review. British Medical Journal, Vol. 324, No. 7347, 2002, pp. 1183–1185.
24. Porter S.R., Whitcombe M.S., and Weitzer W. H. Multiple Surveys of Students and Survey Fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, Vol. 121, Spring, 2004, pp. 63–73.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ann Forsyth
Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, 106 West Sibley Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Asha Weinstein Agrawal
Mineta Transportation Institute, San José State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0185.
Kevin J. Krizek
Department of Planning and Design, University of Colorado, Campus Box 314, Boulder, CO 80309-0314.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 75

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Walking and Walkability in Delhi: Dissonance between Environmental Per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A database to analyze cycling routes in Medellin, Colombia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Analysis of walking patterns in a pedestrian environment using cellula...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Measuring Bicycling Within the Community
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Using the built environment to oversample walk, transit, and bicycle t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Reliability and Validity of the Transport and Physical Activity Questi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub