Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Measuring Nonmotorized Accessibility and Connectivity in a Robust Pedestrian Network

Abstract

This paper explores measures of pedestrian accessibility and network connectivity with a network that includes pedestrian facilities in addition to the street network. Studies that focus on walkability usually use available street networks that do not include pedestrian-only facilities. The effect of missing pedestrian connections where the street network is richer than the pedestrian network has been examined in some studies, but the case of suburban environments with robust pedestrian networks has mostly been ignored. In the current study, various measures of connectivity and accessibility were compared between the pedestrian network and the street network in different suburban settings and for accessibility to different land use activities, such as schools and retail centers. Documenting the degree to which the pedestrian network enhanced pedestrian accessibility over the street network alone was motivated by the desire to inform research and to inform policy. Nine neighborhoods in the city of Davis, California, with typical suburban densities, a variety of street network types, and an extensive system of off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities were used in the study. A network that included all minor and primary roads in the city plus pedestrian ways was also used. This network included 60 mi of off-street facilities and excluded freeways not open to pedestrians. Households were used as origins and schools and retail centers as destinations to demonstrate the effect of the pedestrian network on connectivity and accessibility in different parts of the city. The results of this study can be used to improve the measurement of built environment in studies of active travel and to increase understanding of the effect of the pedestrian network in the suburban environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Boer R., Zheng Y., Overton A., Ridgeway G.K., and Cohen D. A. Neighborhood Design and Walking Trips in Ten U.S. Metropolitan Areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2007, pp. 298–304.
2. Ewing R. Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Design: A Primer for Smart Growth. Smart Growth Network, Washington, D.C., 1996.
3. Fan Y., and Khattak A. J. Does Urban Form Matter in Solo and Joint Activity Engagement? Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 92, No. 3–4, 2009, pp. 199–209.
4. Frank L., and Kavage S. A National Plan for Physical Activity: The Enabling Role of the Built Environment. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, Vol. 6 (Supp. 2), 2009, pp. S186–S195.
5. Frank L., Sallis J., Conway T., Chapman J., Saelens B., and Bachman W. Multiple Pathways from Land Use to Health: Walkability Associations with Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2006, pp. 75–87.
6. Greenwald M.J., and Boarnet M. G. Built Environment as Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Nonwork Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 33–42.
7. McCormack G., Shiell A., Doyle-Baker P., Friedenreich C., Sandalack B., and Giles-Corti B. Testing the Reliability of Neighborhood-Specific Measures of Physical Activity Among Canadian Adults. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2009, pp. 367–373.
8. Messenger T., and Ewing R. Transit-Oriented Development in the SunBelt. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 145–153.
9. Canepa B. Bursting the Bubble: Determining the Transit-Oriented Development's Walkable Limits. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 28–34.
10. Cerin E., Saelens B.E., Sallis J.F., and Frank L. D. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and Development of a Short Form. Medicine & Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1682–1691.
11. Cervero R., and Radisch C. Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods. UCTC 281. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, 1995.
12. Al-Hagla K.S. Evaluating New Urbanisms Walkability Performance: A Comprehensive Approach to Assessment in Saifi Village, Beirut, Lebanon. Urban Design International, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2009, pp. 139–151.
13. Carnoske C., Hoehner C., Ruthmann N., Frank L., Handy S., Hill J., Ryan S., Sallis J., Glanz K., and Brownson R. Developer and Realtor Perspectives on Factors That Influence Development, Sale, and Perceived Demand for Activity-Friendly Communities. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 7 (Supp. 1), 2010, pp. S48–S59.
14. Hess P., Moudon A., Snyder M., and Stanilov K. Site Design and Pedestrian Travel. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 9–19.
15. Handy S. Accessibility- Vs. Mobility-Enhancing Strategies for Addressing Automobile Dependence in the U.S. eScholarship, University of California, 2002. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5kn4s4pb.
16. Hansen W. G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1959, pp. 73–76.
17. Handy S., Paterson R., and Butler K. Planning for Street Connectivity: Getting from Here to There. American Planning Association, Chicago, Ill., 2003.
18. Dill J. Travel Behavior and Attitudes: New Urbanist Versus Traditional Suburban Neighborhoods. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
19. Cervero R., and Kockelman R. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199–219.
20. Reilly M. K. Influence of Urban Form and Land Use on Mode Choice—Evidence from the 1996 Bay Area Travel Survey. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
21. Song Y. Impacts of Urban Growth Management on Urban Form: A Comparative Study of Portland, Oregon; Orange County, Florida; and Montgomery County, Maryland. National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland, College Park, 2003.
22. Boarnet M., and Sarmiento S. Can Land-Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link Between Non-Work Travel and Land-Use Characteristics. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1155–1169.
23. Handy S. L. Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 135–144.
24. Mately T.M., Goldman L.M., and Fineman B. J. Pedestrian Travel Potential in Northern New Jersey: A Metropolitan Planning Organization's Approach to Identifying Investment Priorities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 1–8.
25. Allen E. Measuring the New Urbanism with Community Indicators. Presented at Contrasts and Transitions, National Conference, American Planning Association, San Diego, Calif., 1997.
26. Crane R., and Crepeau R. Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Center for Activity Systems Analysis, University of California, Irvine, 1998. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5qq985sv. Accessed Feb. 15, 2007.
27. Aultman-Hall L., Roorda M., and Baetz B. Using GIS for Evaluation of Neighborhood Pedestrian Accessibility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1997, pp. 10–17.
28. Chin G.K., Van Niel W. K. P., Giles-Corti B., and Knuiman M. Accessibility and Connectivity in Physical Activity Studies: The Impact of Missing Pedestrian Data, Preventive Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2008, pp. 41–45.
29. Bejleri I., Steiner R.L., Provost R.E., Fischman A., and Arafat A. A. Understanding and Mapping Elements of Urban Form That Affect Children's Ability to Walk and Bicycle to School: Case Study of Two Tampa Bay, Florida Counties. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2137, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 148–158.
30. Porta S., and Renne J. L. Linking Urban Design to Sustainability: Formal Indicators of Social Urban Sustainability Field Research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2005, pp. 51–64.
31. Buehler T.J., and Handy S. L. Fifty Years of Bicycle Policy in Davis, California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2074, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 52–57.
32. Tal G., and Handy S. L. Children's Biking for Nonschool Purposes: Getting to Soccer Games in Davis, California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2074, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 40–45.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gil Tal
Institute of Transportation Studies, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616-8762.
Susan Handy
Institute of Transportation Studies, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616-8762.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 567

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 68

  1. Quantifying the pedestrian access potential of suburban street network...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Reflections on the Role of Researchers in Shaping the Ideas that Shape...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Pedestrian Network Concept: A Systematic Literature Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Access to Parks and Green Spaces in Quebec City, Canada: Developing Ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. How do crosswalk delays affect pedestrian access in zoning areas? Walk...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Do footbridge and underpass improve pedestrian safety? A Hong Kong cas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Yaya Yolu Ana Akslarının Belirlenmesinde Ulaşım Talebi Odaklı Çevresel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Global interest in walking accessibility: a scoping review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Post-pandemic planning: Do we have enough and efficient access to park...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Typological index of alleyways: mapping the pattern of a forgotten urb...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The inclusive 15-minute city: Walkability analysis with sidewalk netwo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Connectivity analysis in pedestrian networks: A case study in Wuhan, C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Planning in the age of pandemics: Renewing suburban design
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Measuring the Built Walking Environment through Image Calibration Usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Measuring Connectivity of Pedestrian Street Networks in the Built Envi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Accessibility as a factor for a livable cities: The case of Salt City ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Investigating pedestrian connectivity within apartment complexes: a ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Towards Attaining Sustainable Retail Property Locations: The Relations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. A persistent homology model of street network connectivity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Walking Environment and Obesity: A Gender-Specific Association Study i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Attributing pedestrian networks with semantic information based on mul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Comprehensive Pedestrian Level of Service Measure For Urban Footways U...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Analysing the Impact of Pedestrian Network Centrality on Segment-Level...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Walkability scoring: Why and how does a three-dimensional pedestrian n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Effect of street network design on traffic congestion and traffic safe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Measuring Geometric Properties of Urban Blocks in Baghdad: A Comparati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Walking accessibility to neighbourhood open space in a multi-level urb...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Towards sustainable pedestrian mobility in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Analysis of the Pedestrian System Indicators of City Blocks Based on t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Incorporating Low-Stress Bicycling Connectivity into Expanded Transit ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Connecting the city: A three-dimensional pedestrian network of Hong Ko...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Comparing accessibility and connectivity metrics derived from dedicate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Revisiting transit-oriented development: Alleys as critical walking in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Promote transit via hardening first-and-last-mile accessibility: Learn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process in Metropolitan Transport Means...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: A Guide for Urban A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. First-and-last mile solution via bicycling to improving transit access...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Assessing urban sidewalk networks based on three constructs: a synthes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Making US cities pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Local walkability index: assessing built environment influence on walk...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Using best–worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: a study ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Modelling the impact of fused grid network design on mode choice behav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Beyond the bus stop: Where transit users walk
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. The Importance of Pedestrian Network Connectivity for Adolescent Healt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Pedestrian Network Analysis using a Network Consisting of Formal Pedes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Low-stress bicycling connectivity: Assessment of the network build-out...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Bu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Assessment of effects of street connectivity on traffic performance an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Transportation sustainability in the urban context: a comprehensive re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Unpacking walkability indices and their inherent assumptions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for pla...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Ungating the city: A permeability perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Differences in child-drawn and GIS-modelled routes to school: Impact o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Living in school catchment neighborhoods: Perceived built environments...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Determining transit service coverage by non-motorized accessibility to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Evaluating the impact of connectivity, continuity, and topography of s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. A comparison of road- and footpath-based walkability indices and their...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Community Severance: Where Is It Found and at What Cost?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Connectivity and physical activity: using footpath networks to measure...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Effectiveness of Changes in Street Layout and Design for Reducing Barr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Assessing Benefits of Neighborhood Walkability to Single-Family Proper...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Effects of changes in road network characteristics on road casualties:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Street Connectivity versus Street Widening...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Non-motorized transport and university populations: an analysis of con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Development of Low-Cost Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub