Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Accounting for Systematic Influences on Preference Heterogeneity in Air Travel: Application to a Low-Travel-Propensity Market

Abstract

Modeling passengers' itinerary choice behavior helps in understanding the increasingly competitive airline market and in predicting air travel demand. Recently, investigation of the variation in passengers' preferences with regard to factors influencing their choice through estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model has received attention. An extended form of the model identifies sources of heterogeneity and consequently makes the choice models less restrictive in considering both systematic and random preference variation across individuals. This research investigates the existence of significant interactions between passengers' preference heterogeneity around the mean of random parameters in estimated utility functions and observed sociodemographic or trip-related attributes in the case of air travel. Unlike previous research in the literature that has focused on choice behavior modeling in mature markets with relatively high per capita rates of air travel activity, this study centers on a survey of travelers in Tehran, Iran, a low-propensity air travel market. Several distributions for random parameters are considered to test the impacts of restricting distributions to allow only normality. The potential to improve model fit with alternative distributions was confirmed. The findings suggest that differences in the marginal utilities can be explained mostly by differences in travel experience. More experienced passengers are less sensitive to fare and more sensitive to flight level-of-service attributes. Furthermore, the estimated distributions of willingness-to-pay (WTP) measures confirm the value of accounting for interactions between preference heterogeneity and observed variables and in this case yield higher mean WTP values than does analysis that omits these interaction effects.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wen C.H., and Lai S. C. Latent Class Models of International Air Carrier Choice. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 46, 2010, pp. 211–221.
2. Alamdari F., and Mason K. The Future of Airline Distribution. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 12, 2006, pp. 122–134.
3. Teichert T., Shehu E., and Wartburg I. W. Customer Segmentation Revisited: The Case of the Airline Industry. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 42, 2008, pp. 227–242.
4. Airports Council International. Year to Date International Passenger Traffic June 2010. http://www.aci.aero/cda/aci_common/display/main/aci_content07_c.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-212-1376-1379_666_2. Accessed Oct. 15, 2010.
5. Rezaei A., Puckett S.M., and Nassiri H. Heterogeneity in Preferences of Air Travel Itinerary in a Low-Frequency Market. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2214, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 10–19.
6. Hensher D.A., and Greene W. H. The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice. Transportation, Vol. 30, 2003, pp. 133–176.
7. Warburg V., Bhat C.R., and Adler T. J. Modeling Demographic and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Air Passengers' Sensitivity to Service Attributes in Itinerary Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1951, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 7–16.
8. Skinner R.E. Jr. Airport Choice: An Empirical Study. Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 102, 1976, pp. 871–883.
9. Yoo K.E., and Ashford N. Carrier Choices of Air Passengers in Pacific Rim: Using Comparative Analysis and Complementary Interpretation of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Data. In Transportation Research Record 1562, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 1–7.
10. Pathomsiri S., and Haghani A. Taste Variations in Airport Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1915, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 27–35.
11. Suzuki Y. Modeling and Testing the “Two-Step” Decision Process of Travelers in Airport and Airline Choices. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 43, 2007, pp. 1–20.
12. Espino R., Martin J.C., and Roman C. Analyzing the Effect of Preference Heterogeneity on Willingness to Pay for Improving Service Quality in an Airline Choice Context. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 44, 2008, pp. 593–606.
13. Wei W., and Hansen M. Impact of Aircraft Size and Seat Availability on Airlines' Demand and Market Share in Duopoly Markets. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 41, 2005, pp. 315–327.
14. Coldren G.M., and Koppelman F. S. Modeling the Competition Among Air-Travel Itinerary Share: GEV Model Development. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 345–365.
15. Train K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2002.
16. Rose J.M., Hensher D.A., and Greene W. H. Recovering Costs Through Price and Service Differentiation: Accounting for Exogenous Information on Attribute Processing Strategies in Airline Choice. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 11, 2005, pp. 400–407.
17. Hensher D.A., and Rose J. M. Respondent Behavior in Discrete Choice Modeling with a Focus on the Valuation of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2005, pp. 17–30.
18. Hensher D. A. Reducing Sign Violation for VTTS Distributions Through Endogenous Recognition of an Individual's Attribute Processing Strategy. International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2007, pp. 333–349.
19. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., and Greene W. H. Applied Choice Analysis. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2005.
20. Hensher D. A. The Signs of the Times: Imposing a Globally Signed Condition on Willingness to Pay Distributions. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 205–222.
21. Adler T., Falzarano C.S., and Spitz G. Modeling Service Trade-Offs in Air Itinerary Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1915, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 20–26.
22. Hess H., Bierlaire M., and Polak J. W. Estimation of Value of Travel-Time Saving Using Mixed Logit Models. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 221–236.
23. Official Airline Guide. OAG Worldwide Limited, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom, 2008.
24. Mason K. The Value and Usage of Ticket Flexibility for Short Haul Business Travellers. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 12, 2006, pp. 92–97.
25. Civil Aviation Authority. Recent Trends in Growth of UK Air Passenger Demand. 2008. http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/589/erg_recent_trends_final_v2.pdf. Accessed Nov. 13, 2011.
26. Atanassov E.I., and Mariya K. D. Numerical Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Rezaei
Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Avenue, Tehran, Iran.
Sean M. Puckett
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney, 144 Burren Street, New South Wales 2006, Australia
John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, 55 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Accounting for systematic heterogeneity across car commuters in respon...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub