Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Discrete Choice Estimator Properties for Finite Population and Simulation Sample Sizes

Abstract

Econometric models based on simulations are used extensively in transportation. Simulation methods provide only an approximation of the objective function and produce estimators that suffer from bias and loss in efficiency. Two types of bias are known to exist in simulation-based estimators: simulation bias, as a result of the nonlinear transformation in the log likelihood (LL) function, and optimization bias, caused by the maximization operator, which depends on the variance of the simulated LL with respect to the random draws and the population sample. In this paper, the properties of the estimators are studied with resampling techniques in various simulation configurations. In the experiments, optimization bias dominates simulation bias, and in the presence of panel data the use of some randomized quasi–Monte Carlo techniques aiming at reducing simulation variance only marginally affects the estimated parameters for a given sample size. Results also confirm that the population resampling, though numerically costly, is a simple and effective procedure to deliver a better understanding of parameter properties.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
2. Bastin F., Cirillo C., and Toint Ph. L. Application of an Adaptive Monte Carlo Algorithm to Mixed Logit Estimation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, No. 7, 2006, pp. 577–593.
3. Bhat C. R. Quasi-Random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2001, pp. 677–693.
4. Munger D., L'Ecuyer P., Bastin F., Cirillo C., and Tuffin B. Estimation of the Mixed Logit Likelihood Function by Randomized Quasi–Monte Carlo. Transportation Research Part B (forthcoming).
5. Kristensen D., and Salanie B. High Order Improvements for Approximate Estimators. Discussion Paper No. 0910-15. Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, May 2010, pp. 1–62.
6. Gouriéroux C., and Monfort A. Simulation-Based Inference: A Survey with Special Reference to Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 59, No. 1/2, 1993, pp. 5–33.
7. Newey W.K., and McFadden D. Large Sample Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. IV (Engle R. and McFadden D., eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1994, pp. 2111–2245.
8. Bastin F., and Cirillo C. Reducing Simulation Bias in Mixed Logit Model Estimation. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, pp. 71–88.
9. Fox J. Multiple and Generalised Non-Parametric Regression. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 2000.
10. Efron B., and Tibshirani R. J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. No. 57 in Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 1993.
11. Cirillo C., and Xu R. Forecasting Cybercar Use for Airport Ground Access: A Case Study at BWI (Baltimore Washington International Airport). Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 136, No. 3, 2010, pp. 186–194.
12. Bastin F., Cirillo C., and Toint Ph. L. Convergence Theory for Nonconvex Stochastic Programming with an Application to Mixed Logit. Mathematical Programming, Series B, Vol. 108, No. 2/3, 2006, pp. 207–234.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fabian Bastin
Department of Computing Science and Operational Research, University of Montreal, CIRRELT, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada.
Cinzia Cirillo
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, Building No. 088, College Park, MD 20742.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub