Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Analyzing Probit Bayes Estimator for Flexible Covariance Structures in Discrete Choice Modeling

Abstract

Research in discrete choice modeling in recent decades has devoted an enormous effort to generalizing the distribution of the error term and to developing estimation methods that account for more flexible structures of error heterogeneity. Whereas the multinomial probit model offers a fully flexible covariance matrix, the maximum simulated likelihood estimator is extremely involved. However, Bayesian techniques have the potential to break down the complexity of the estimator. By using a Monte Carlo study, this paper tests the ability of a probit Bayes estimator based on Gibbs sampling to recover different substitution patterns. The results show that it is possible to use the Bayes estimator of a full covariance matrix to recover different covariance structures, even when small samples are used. Thus, the model can identify the true substitution patterns, by avoiding misspecification, even if these patterns are the result of multiple restrictions over the covariance matrix. In fact, the recovery of simpler covariance structures, such as that of the independent and identically distributed and heteroskedastic covariance without correlation, is more accurate than the recovery of more complicated structures, including fully unrestricted substitution patterns.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics (Zarembka P., ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1974, pp. 105–142.
2. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
3. Manski C. The Structure of Random Utility Models. Theory and Decision, Vol. 8, 1977, pp. 229–254.
4. Bolduc D., and Ben-Akiva M. A Multinomial Probit Formulation for Large Choice Sets. Proc., 6th International Conference on Travel Behaviour, Vol. 2, 1991, pp. 243–258.
5. Brownstone D., and Train K. Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, 1999, pp. 109–129.
6. Walker J. L. Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
7. McFadden D., and Train K. E. Mixed MNL Models of Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15, 2000, pp. 447–470.
8. McFadden D. Econometric Analysis of Qualitative Response Models. In Handbook of Econometrics II (Friliches Z.G. and Intriligator M. D., eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1984.
9. Ben-Akiva M., and Bolduc D. Multinomial Probit with a Logit Kernel and a General Parametric Specification of the Covariance Structure. Working paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
10. Thurstone L. A Law of Comparative Judgement. Psychological Review, Vol. 34, 1927, pp. 273–286.
11. Daganzo C. Multinomial Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting. Academic Press, New York, 1979.
12. Bolduc D. A Practical Technique to Estimate Multinomial Probit Models in Transportation: Computational Details and an Application to a Disaggregate Mode Choice Problem. Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique, Document de Travail du CREST, Paris, 1994.
13. Hajivassiliou V., and Ruud P. Classical Estimation Methods for LDV Models Using Simulation. In Handbook of Econometrics (Engle R. and McFadden D., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1994, pp. 2383–2441.
14. Hajivassiliou V., McFadden D., and Ruud P. Simulation of Multivariate Normal Rectangle Probabilities and Their Derivatives: Theoretical and Computational Results. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 72, 1996, pp. 85–134.
15. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009.
16. Munizaga M.A., and Álvarez-Daziano R. Testing Mixed Logit and Probit by Simulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 53–62.
17. Horowitz J. L. Reconsidering the Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1991, pp. 433–438.
18. Bolduc D. A Practical Technique to Estimate Multinomial Probit Models in Transportation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 63–79.
19. Daganzo C., and Sheffi Y. On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment. Transportation Science, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 253–274.
20. Yai T., Iwakura S., and Morichi S. Multinomial Probit with Structured Covariance for Route Choice Behavior. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 195–207.
21. Bhat C. R. The Maximum Approximated Composite Marginal Likelihood (MACML) Estimation of Mixed Unordered Response Choice Models. Technical paper. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2010.
22. Connors R.D., Hess S., and Daly A. Analytic Approximations for Computing Probit Choice Probabilities. Presented at 2nd International Choice Modelling Conference, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2011.
23. Albert J., and Chib S. Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 88, 1993, pp. 669–679.
24. McCulloch R.R., Polson N.G., and Rossi P. E. Bayesian Analysis of the Multinomial Probit Model with Fully Identified Parameters. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 99, 2000, pp. 173–193.
25. Geweke J. Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to the Calculation of Posterior Moments. In Bayesian Statistics (Bernardo J., Berger A., Dawid A., and Smith F., eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1992, pp. 169–193.
26. Hajivassiliou V., and McFadden D. The Method of Simulated Scores for the Estimation of LDV Models. Econometrica, Vol. 66, 1998, pp. 863–896.
27. Keane M. A Computationally Practical Simulation Estimator for Panel Data. Econometrica, Vol. 62, 1994, pp. 95–116.
28. Bolduc D. Generalized Autoregressive Errors in the Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1992, pp. 155–170.
29. Bunch D. A. Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 25, 1991, pp. 1–12.
30. Dansie B. R. Parameter Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1985, pp. 526–528.
31. McCulloch R., and Rossi P. Bayesian Analysis of the Multinomial Probit Model. In Simulation-Based Inference in Econometrics (Mariano R., Schuermann T., and Weeks M., eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
32. Rossi P., McCulloch R., and Allenby G. Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2006.
33. Nobile A. Bayesian Multinomial Probit Models with a Normalization Constraint. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 99, 2000, pp. 335–345.
34. Gelfand A., and Smith A. F. M. Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 85, 1990, pp. 398–409.
35. Elrod T., and Keane M. P. A Factor-Analytic Probit Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1–16.
36. Bolduc D., Fortin B., and Fournier M. A. The Impact of Incentive Policies to Influence Practice Location of General Practitioners: A Multinomial Probit Analysis. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 14, 1996, pp. 703–732.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ricardo A. Daziano
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, 220 Hollister Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Esther Chiew
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, 220 Hollister Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Inference on mode preferences, vehicle purchases, and the energy parad...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub